Use of Autologous Platelet-Rich Plasma to Treat Hypertrophic Burn Scars

NCT ID: NCT03935594

Last Updated: 2023-01-09

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

3 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-09-18

Study Completion Date

2022-10-19

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Hypertrophic burn scars are experienced by more than 70% of burn victims. They are a major source of decreased quality of life in burn patients due to pain, decreased range of motion, and poor cosmetic appearance. Current treatment strategies (including fat grafting and laser resurfacing) are either highly invasive, prohibitively costly, or painful. Autologous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) does not require anesthesia, and is an inexpensive, safe, fast, and less painful alternative that has been recognized for its role in reducing scars associated with acne, among other things. While PRP has not been studied specifically in burn scars, there is sufficient theoretical and practical evidence that it will improve the appearance and feel of these debilitating scars, representing a large potential benefit for these patients with minimal associated risk.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Severe burn injury is associated with hypertrophic scarring, which occurs in up to 70% of burn patients (Finnerty et al., 2016). Burn scars are particularly troublesome because they cause debilitating neuropathic pain and itch, joint contractures and stiffness that limit range of motion, inability to sweat, and physical disfigurement of cosmetically sensitive areas such as the hands and face.

Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is plasma with a higher concentration of platelets, and is prepared by drawing up a small amount of a patient's blood, centrifuging it, and collecting the platelet-rich layer. Many automated machines exist for doing this process. Platelets contain a multitude of growth factors and other small molecules that have been shown to promote wound healing and tissue regeneration in a variety of contexts. PRP, which is rich in these healing growth factors, has been studied extensively and has proved to be both a safe and effective treatment modality for a wide range of applications, including acne scars and hair loss (Elghblawi et al., 2018). It has been shown to be a safe and effective treatment for some types of surgical and traumatic scars, and has been safely applied to acute burn wounds where it has been shown to improve healing and subsequent scarring (Venter et al., 2016). Despite these known uses of PRP, its role in reducing the extent and severity of mature hypertrophic burn scars after they have already healed is notably lacking in the literature.

The purpose of this study is to assess whether intradermally-injected autologous platelet-rich plasma improves the size, texture, color, elasticity, contour, and neuropathic pain associated with mature burn scars.

Specific Aims:

1. Compare the effectiveness of intradermally-injected autologous platelet-rich plasma versus normal saline (NS) to improve burn scars, as measured by both clinician-reported (Vancouver scar scale; VSS) and patient-reported measures (Patient and Observer Scar Assessment Scale; POSAS).
2. Compare the effectiveness of intradermally-injected autologous platelet-rich plasma versus normal saline as a control to improve neuropathic pain associated with burn scars.
3. Understand the mechanism of action of PRP in improving burn scars via histological analysis of collagen content in the burn scar tissue biopsy specimens.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hypertrophic Scar

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

All patients meeting inclusion/exclusion criteria will be offered enrollment. Using a coin flip, patients will have a 50% chance of receiving PRP injection on the right half of the scar (as opposed to the left half). Multiple scar sites may be enrolled per patient, without limit.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants
Patients will be blinded to which halves of their scar are in either arm of the study. On each visit, before the patient is able to see the contents of syringes used for injection of either normal saline or platelet rich plasma, the syringes will be covered with a white sticker and labeled such that the provider knows which syringe has PRP vs normal saline but the patient does not (PRP is yellow and normal saline is clear). Depending on which side (left vs right) was assigned PRP vs normal saline, the appropriate area will be injected with 1mL/1sq-cm of PRP or normal saline.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PRP injection right half

The scar to be treated will first be wiped with an alcohol swab, then measured and marked out with a marking pen such that the entirety of the scar will fit into a symmetric ellipse that is drawn, and the ellipse is filled entirely with the scar tissue. A ruler will be used to measure the scar in its greatest horizontal span, and the midway point will be marked with a vertical line. A coin flip will determine if the PRP injection (the experimental half) will be on the right half of the scar (as opposed to the left half). The half of the scar that will not receive PRP will be the control half.

After finishing the VSS and POSAS, the area inside the control half of the ellipse will then be subdivided with a marking pen into 1cm x 1cm square boxes, with the plan of injecting 1mL normal saline into each 1 square cm box at 0 months, 1 month, 4 months, and 6 months.

Punch biopsies from each scar will be will be obtained at both six months and one year from enrollment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PRP Injection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

1mL platelet rich plasma will be injected into each 1cm x 1cm area of scar tissue of the experimental half of the scar.

Saline Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

1mL NS will be injected into each 1cm x 1cm area of scar tissue of the control half of the scar.

PRP injection left half

The scar to be treated will first be wiped with an alcohol swab, then measured and marked out with a marking pen such that the entirety of the scar will fit into a symmetric ellipse that is drawn, and the ellipse is filled entirely with the scar tissue. A ruler will be used to measure the scar in its greatest horizontal span, and the midway point will be marked with a vertical line. A coin flip will determine if the PRP injection (the experimental half) will be on the right half of the scar (as opposed to the left half). The half of the scar that will not receive PRP will be the control half.

After finishing the VSS and POSAS, the area inside the experimental half of the ellipse will then be subdivided with a marking pen into 1cm x 1cm square boxes, with the plan of injecting 1mL PRP into each 1 square cm box at 0 months, 1 month, 4 months, and 6 months.

Punch biopsies from each scar will be will be obtained at both six months and one year from enrollment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

PRP Injection

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

1mL platelet rich plasma will be injected into each 1cm x 1cm area of scar tissue of the experimental half of the scar.

Saline Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

1mL NS will be injected into each 1cm x 1cm area of scar tissue of the control half of the scar.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

PRP Injection

1mL platelet rich plasma will be injected into each 1cm x 1cm area of scar tissue of the experimental half of the scar.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Saline Injection

1mL NS will be injected into each 1cm x 1cm area of scar tissue of the control half of the scar.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Hypertrophic burn scar present on trunk or abdomen

Exclusion Criteria

* Initial burn injury less than 1 year old
* History of chemical or electrical burn
* Genetic or acquired conditions that severely affect systemic wound healing or collagen formation (vasculitis, diabetes, Ehlers-Danlos syndrome, radiation therapy to the scar site or use of immunosuppressive medications within the last year, active cancer)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salam Al Kassis

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Galen Perdikis, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Vanderbilt University School of Medicine

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Cervelli V, Nicoli F, Spallone D, Verardi S, Sorge R, Nicoli M, Balzani A. Treatment of traumatic scars using fat grafts mixed with platelet-rich plasma, and resurfacing of skin with the 1540 nm nonablative laser. Clin Exp Dermatol. 2012 Jan;37(1):55-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2230.2011.04199.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22182435 (View on PubMed)

Prochazka V, Klosova H, Stetinsky J, Gumulec J, Vitkova K, Salounova D, Dvorackova J, Bielnikova H, Klement P, Levakova V, Ocelka T, Pavliska L, Kovanic P, Klement GL. Addition of platelet concentrate to dermo-epidermal skin graft in deep burn trauma reduces scarring and need for revision surgeries. Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2014 Jun;158(2):242-58. doi: 10.5507/bp.2013.070. Epub 2013 Sep 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24108222 (View on PubMed)

Ruiz A, Cuestas D, Garcia P, Quintero J, Forero Y, Galvis I, Velasquez O. Early intervention in scar management and cutaneous burns with autologous platelet-rich plasma. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Dec;17(6):1194-1199. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12554. Epub 2018 Apr 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29682893 (View on PubMed)

Asif M, Kanodia S, Singh K. Combined autologous platelet-rich plasma with microneedling verses microneedling with distilled water in the treatment of atrophic acne scars: a concurrent split-face study. J Cosmet Dermatol. 2016 Dec;15(4):434-443. doi: 10.1111/jocd.12207. Epub 2016 Jan 8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26748836 (View on PubMed)

Klosova H, Stetinsky J, Bryjova I, Hledik S, Klein L. Objective evaluation of the effect of autologous platelet concentrate on post-operative scarring in deep burns. Burns. 2013 Sep;39(6):1263-76. doi: 10.1016/j.burns.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Mar 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23481151 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IRB #190170

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Microsurfaced Grafts in Deep Burn Wounds
NCT04589442 RECRUITING PHASE4