Sit Less or Exercise More: Impact on Cardiometabolic Health in MS

NCT ID: NCT03919058

Last Updated: 2021-08-31

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

28 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-13

Study Completion Date

2021-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study evaluates the impact of reducing sitting time and increasing exercise time on cardiometabolic health in persons with Multiple Sclerosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To date, it is clear that sedentary behaviour is strongly related to an increased risk of type II diabetes, cardiovascular disease and premature mortality. People suffering from chronic disabilities appear to be particularly susceptible to a sedentary lifestyle and inactivity due to primary disease symptoms. To date, this is an important new research topic in Multiple Sclerosis (MS, \~2.3 million people worldwide, \~10-12.000 diagnosed in Belgium) treatment, since previous research reported a significantly higher prevalence of sedentary behaviour in persons with MS (PwMS) compared to healthy controls (HC). PwMS are reported to have a 40% lower daily step count compared to healthy inactive persons and tend to accumulate their sedentary time in longer bouts. As described above and similar to other chronic conditions, a sedentary lifestyle also makes PwMS more vulnerable to the accumulation of important cardiometabolic comorbidities that seem inactivity-related rather than a direct result of non-reversible tissue injury. Such comorbidities include impaired whole body glycaemic control, an abnormal blood lipid profile, an unhealthy body composition and hypertension. In this respect, it is important to note that corticosteroids, which are often used to treat MS patients pharmacologically, elevate fasting glucose and insulin concentrations and induce insulin resistance in HC therefore probably also increase several cardiometabolic risk factors in MS.

Up to now, research in MS has been focused on structured exercise and its positive effects on functional parameters are well-known (e.g. improvements in cardiorespiratory fitness, muscle strength, balance, fatigue, cognition, quality of life and respiratory function). However, evidence is growing that sedentary time, independent of the (dis)practice of structured exercise, is an important independent health risk factor. Consequently, any strategy that also improves cardiometabolic health may help to further optimize rehabilitation in MS. Breaking up and reducing sedentary time with easy, daily activities such as household activities and other activities which increase light-intensity walking and standing, known as non-exercise physical activity (NEPA) may be such a strategy.

NEPA has already been shown to significantly improve cardiometabolic risk markers in healthy, sedentary subjects, type II diabetes patients and obese adults and it involves lower intensity physical activities that are probably more feasible for PwMS. Moreover, with comparable activity workloads, reducing sitting time by NEPA of longer duration decreases insulin levels and fasting lipid levels more than performing one structured exercise bout of moderate intensity that is usually described in current activity guidelines. So far however, acute exercise bouts and NEPA effects on cardiometabolic health in this population have never been described. Therefore, the aim of this study is to investigate whether (1) cardiometabolic health (glycaemic control, blood lipids, inflammation markers and blood pressure) of persons with MS improves when sedentary time is reduced and (2) NEPA results in better cardiometabolic health parameters than (a shorter daily bout of) moderate-intensity exercise when workload of both activities is identical in this population.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Multiple Sclerosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Participants will follow four regimes of 4 days each including a control, a sit less, a sit and an exercise regime. The order of the sit and sit less regimes will be randomized. Each activity regime will be followed by a wash-out period of 10 days during which subjects will continue their normal lifestyle.
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
The outcome assessor will not know the code of the different regimes.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Regime 1: control regime

All participants start with the control regime, where baseline activity will be measured.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Baseline activity (control regime)

Intervention Type OTHER

This is a baseline measurement of physical activity during which subjects will be instructed not to change activity patterns during four days and to note all activities they perform.

Regime 2: Sit regime/sit less regime

The order of the regimes will be randomized, half of the participants will execute the sit regime as second regime, the other half will execute the sit less regime as second regime. Subjects have to follow a pre-defined activity protocol and receive an activity tracker (Polar M200) in order to self-monitor their activity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Increased sitting time (sit regime)

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants have to spend 14h of their day sitting, 1h walking and 1h standing, for four consecutive days. According to the compendium of Ainsworth et al. (2011), this corresponds with a daily workload of activities (DWA) of 27 metabolic equivalents (MET's) per day.

Non-exercise physical activity (sit less regime)

Intervention Type OTHER

Each day (4 days in total) will consist of 3h walking, 4h standing and 9h sitting. These time frames are chosen to result in a comparable DWA increase as the exercise regime compared to the sit regime (+7 MET's)27. The additional 2h of walking and 3h of standing, compared to the sitting regime, will be done in a minimum of four bouts with a time interval of \> 1h. The subjects will be instructed to walk on a slow pace. i.e. 2-3 km/h (e.g. walking during shopping and work related walking in an office).

Regime 3: Sit less regime/sit regime

The order of the regimes will be randomized, half of the participants will execute the sit regime as second regime, the other half will execute the sit less regime as second regime. Subjects have to follow a pre-defined activity protocol and receive an activity tracker (Polar M200) in order to self-monitor their activity.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Increased sitting time (sit regime)

Intervention Type OTHER

Participants have to spend 14h of their day sitting, 1h walking and 1h standing, for four consecutive days. According to the compendium of Ainsworth et al. (2011), this corresponds with a daily workload of activities (DWA) of 27 metabolic equivalents (MET's) per day.

Non-exercise physical activity (sit less regime)

Intervention Type OTHER

Each day (4 days in total) will consist of 3h walking, 4h standing and 9h sitting. These time frames are chosen to result in a comparable DWA increase as the exercise regime compared to the sit regime (+7 MET's)27. The additional 2h of walking and 3h of standing, compared to the sitting regime, will be done in a minimum of four bouts with a time interval of \> 1h. The subjects will be instructed to walk on a slow pace. i.e. 2-3 km/h (e.g. walking during shopping and work related walking in an office).

Regime 4: Exercise regime

The exercise regime is the final regime for all participants. This is comparable with the sit regime, but 1h of sitting is replaced with 1 exercise bout.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Structured exercise (exercise regime)

Intervention Type OTHER

One hour of sitting in the sit regime will be replaced with 1 training session (1h) on a cycle ergometer in the research center. The remaining hours of each day (4 days in total) have to be spent as follows: 13h sitting, 1h walking and 1h standing for daily care. The intensity of the training session (50-60% of Wmax) results in a DWA of 34.5 MET's according to the compendium of physical activities. Duration of training sessions will be adapted individually with ActivPAL data of the sit less and sit regime to identically match DWA increase between the sit less and exercise regime, compared to the sitting regime.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Baseline activity (control regime)

This is a baseline measurement of physical activity during which subjects will be instructed not to change activity patterns during four days and to note all activities they perform.

Intervention Type OTHER

Increased sitting time (sit regime)

Participants have to spend 14h of their day sitting, 1h walking and 1h standing, for four consecutive days. According to the compendium of Ainsworth et al. (2011), this corresponds with a daily workload of activities (DWA) of 27 metabolic equivalents (MET's) per day.

Intervention Type OTHER

Non-exercise physical activity (sit less regime)

Each day (4 days in total) will consist of 3h walking, 4h standing and 9h sitting. These time frames are chosen to result in a comparable DWA increase as the exercise regime compared to the sit regime (+7 MET's)27. The additional 2h of walking and 3h of standing, compared to the sitting regime, will be done in a minimum of four bouts with a time interval of \> 1h. The subjects will be instructed to walk on a slow pace. i.e. 2-3 km/h (e.g. walking during shopping and work related walking in an office).

Intervention Type OTHER

Structured exercise (exercise regime)

One hour of sitting in the sit regime will be replaced with 1 training session (1h) on a cycle ergometer in the research center. The remaining hours of each day (4 days in total) have to be spent as follows: 13h sitting, 1h walking and 1h standing for daily care. The intensity of the training session (50-60% of Wmax) results in a DWA of 34.5 MET's according to the compendium of physical activities. Duration of training sessions will be adapted individually with ActivPAL data of the sit less and sit regime to identically match DWA increase between the sit less and exercise regime, compared to the sitting regime.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent
* Men and women ≥18 years old
* Clinical diagnosis of MS (McDonald criteria)
* Expanded Disability Status Score ≤ 5
* Daily internet access

Exclusion Criteria

* Reported participation in another biomedical trial which may have an effect on blood parameters one month before the pre-study examination or during the study
* Blood donation in the past three months
* Pregnancy or intention of becoming pregnant
* Reported dietary habits: medically prescribed diet, slimming diet
* Reported weight loss (\>2kg) in the last three months prior to the screening
* Alcohol use \> 20 units per week (during the last 3 months)
* Experimental drug use (during the last 3 months)
* Medication changes (during the last month)
* Medical conditions which make participation in the study not responsible:
* Heart failure: New York Heart Association (NYHA) 3 or higher
* Angina pectoris or signs of cardiac ischemia during exercise testing
* Mental or physical disability
* Based on historical information not able to walk for 3h per day and stand for 4h per day (e.g. intermittent claudication)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Hasselt University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bert Op't Eijnde

Prof. dr. Bert Op't Eijnde

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bert Op 't Eijnde, Prof. dr.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Hasselt University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hasselt University

Diepenbeek, Limburg, Belgium

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nieste I, Franssen WMA, Duvivier BMFM, Spaas J, Savelberg HHCM, Eijnde BO. Replacing sitting with light-intensity physical activity throughout the day versus 1 bout of vigorous-intensity exercise: similar cardiometabolic health effects in multiple sclerosis. A randomised cross-over study. Disabil Rehabil. 2023 Oct;45(20):3293-3302. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2022.2122601. Epub 2022 Oct 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36190113 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RST-MS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.