Optimizing Psychotherapy for Older Veterans With Chronic Pain

NCT ID: NCT03918642

Last Updated: 2024-11-04

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

126 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-05-16

Study Completion Date

2023-09-14

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being performed to compare the effects of two alternate types of psychotherapy, Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT) and Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET), for chronic musculoskeletal pain in older adults. In addition, the investigators will evaluate which patients respond better to each treatment and further investigate how each treatment works. CBT, which focuses on improving coping skills for pain, is the standard form of psychotherapy offered at VA. EAET instead focuses on understanding how life stress, relationships, and emotions may cause and perpetuate pain.

The investigators are performing the study because pain is a large problem among Veterans. Studies show that chronic pain affects as many as 50% of male Veterans and 75% of female Veterans. The investigators are focusing on older adult Veterans because they have the highest rates of chronic pain at VA, perhaps as high as 80%. The investigators are looking at psychotherapy in this study because VA, the Department of Defense, and the CDC recently recommended psychosocial treatments, such as psychotherapy, as first treatments for chronic pain, along with medications other than opioids (e.g., oxycodone). However, only one form of psychotherapy, CBT, is currently available in clinical practice at VA, and this study may provide evidence for making EAET available to Veterans as well.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The overarching goal of the proposed research is to learn how to optimize psychotherapy for those Veterans most in need and most likely to benefit from psychotherapy, older Veterans with chronic musculoskeletal pain. Chronic pain is a critical healthcare challenge, as the condition affects 50% of all Veterans and affects older Veterans most commonly, severely, and persistently. For years, chronic pain treatment has been notoriously difficult at VA and elsewhere, especially in light of the recent "opioid crisis," in which opioid analgesics, previously a mainstay of chronic pain treatment, have come under increased scrutiny. In response, CDC, VA/DoD, and some experts have called for enhancing and expanding psychosocial treatment options for chronic pain, such as psychotherapy, which are low risk for older Veterans who frequently have multiple medical comorbidities and are taking multiple medications.

Yet standard VA psychotherapy approaches, such as Cognitive Behavior Therapy (CBT), have shown modest benefits for Veterans on pain and other related outcomes, such as mood, anxiety, and sleep. In contrast, a novel psychotherapy approach, Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy (EAET), has shown medium to large benefits for some chronic pain patients. Whereas CBT improves pain and negative emotion by teaching patients cognitive and behavioral coping skills, affecting brain regions that enhance "cognitive control" of pain, EAET operates primarily through emotion regulation, which is thought to influence brain regions and circuits that modulate both physical pain and emotion--a mechanism absent from existing approaches. The literature and the investigators' pilot data indicate that patients who express emotional distress at baseline, such as high anxiety and depressive symptoms, may be particularly likely to benefit from EAET's emotion regulation approach, whereas patients who express less emotional distress may derive more benefit from an approach like CBT, which does not require ready access to emotions.

The proposed randomized clinical trial tests the hypothesis that EAET is superior to CBT on reduction in mean pain severity and other outcomes derived from IMMPACT. To examine which patients are most likely to benefit, this research also tests whether greater baseline emotional distress (using measures of anxiety and depression) predicts stronger benefits from EAET and whether lower baseline emotional distress predicts stronger benefits from CBT. Finally, this research explores whether the benefits of EAET are mediated by improved emotion regulation, whether the benefits of CBT are mediated by improved cognitive and behavioral coping, and whether the benefits of both are mediated by a stronger working alliance. These mediators (e.g., Survey of Pain Attitudes, Working Alliance Inventory) were originally listed as outcomes in the trial registration, but they have been removed. The investigators plan to enroll 160 multi-ethnic/multi-racial older Veterans (age 60-95 years) with chronic musculoskeletal pain at the West Los Angeles VA Medical Center.

This research can introduce an additional, potentially more effective format of psychotherapy at VA so that more Veterans with chronic pain can respond. In addition, this research can lead to better treatment targeting and enhance the understanding of how psychotherapy treatments work. Finally, this research can facilitate the development of critical skills for the PI in psychotherapy research and pain management and enhance his ability to effect positive change for older Veterans.

Recruitment was resumed after the COVID-19 Administrative Hold was lifted in October 2020.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Musculoskeletal Pain

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Two-Group Parallel Comparison Trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy

Seeks to reduce physical (e.g., pain) and emotional (e.g., depression, anxiety) symptoms by helping individuals become aware of their emotions, express them, and resolve emotional conflicts. It will use techniques such as writing about stress, role playing how to handle difficult relationships, recognizing and expressing anger and other feelings, and being more open with others.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Focus on emotions, writing about stress, assertiveness training, role playing new ways to handle relationships, and sharing feelings and experiences with others.

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Seeks to help individuals function better and improve symptoms by teaching various cognitive and behavioral skills to manage symptoms. It will use techniques such as relaxation training, engaging in pleasant activities, pacing yourself, and changing unhelpful ways of thinking.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Focus on cognitive and behavioral skills, such as relaxation, increasing pleasant activities, pacing, and changing ways of thinking.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy

Focus on emotions, writing about stress, assertiveness training, role playing new ways to handle relationships, and sharing feelings and experiences with others.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Cognitive Behavior Therapy

Focus on cognitive and behavioral skills, such as relaxation, increasing pleasant activities, pacing, and changing ways of thinking.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

EAET CBT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Eligible Veterans are age 60 to 95 years old and have had at least 3 months of musculoskeletal pain, including the following conditions most likely to benefit from psychosocial intervention based on previous research:

* regional pain syndromes (e.g., low back, neck, leg, or pelvic pain, or temporomandibular joint disorders);
* widespread pain syndromes (e.g., fibromyalgia);
* whiplash;
* tension headaches; or
* any combination of these disorders.

Exclusion Criteria

* Confirmed hip or knee osteoarthritis without other musculoskeletal pain complaints;
* Leg pain greater than back pain only without other musculoskeletal pain complaints (to exclude radiculopathy in isolation);
* EMG-confirmed "tunnel" syndromes (e.g., carpal or tarsal tunnel syndrome) only without other musculoskeletal pain complaints;
* Autoimmune disease that typically generates pain (e.g., systemic lupus erythematosus, rheumatoid arthritis, inflammatory bowel disease, ankylosing spondylitis);
* Cancer pain, sickle cell disease, neuralgias (e.g., trigeminal neuralgia), burn pain, infection associated with pain (e.g., vertebral infection), cauda equina syndrome, gout, migraine or cluster headaches without additional musculoskeletal pain complaints;
* Uncontrolled severe psychiatric disorder including current psychotic disorder or severe mood disorder not controlled with medications (e.g., schizophrenia or bipolar I disorder), dissociative identity disorder, or active suicide/violence risk in the past 6 months;
* Substantial cognitive impairment or dementia (Mini-Mental State Exam (78) score 24);
* Active severe alcohol or substance use disorder that inhibits the participant's ability to attend session or participate in homework;
* Currently with pain-related litigation or applying for pain-related compensation or compensation increase, or undergoing compensation re-evaluation (e.g., applying for VA service connection or service connection increase for pain);
* Patients who have undergone CBT for pain within the last 3 months of enrollment or who are currently receiving CBT or EAET psychotherapy treatment for pain;
* Unable to fluently read/converse in English;
* Planning to move from the area in the next 6 months.
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

95 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

VA Office of Research and Development

FED

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Brandon C Yarns, MD MS BME

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

VA Greater Los Angeles Healthcare System, West Los Angeles, CA

West Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Yarns BC, Jackson NJ, Alas A, Melrose RJ, Lumley MA, Sultzer DL. Emotional Awareness and Expression Therapy vs Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain in Older Veterans: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Netw Open. 2024 Jun 3;7(6):e2415842. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.15842.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 38869899 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1K2CX001884-01A1

Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT

Identifier Source: secondary_id

NURA-013-18F

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Treatment, Pain, and Opioids
NCT05363176 COMPLETED NA
Chronic Pain Skills Study
NCT02653664 COMPLETED NA
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy (CBT) for Tinnitus
NCT00724152 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2