THREE-row Circular STAPLER in Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer
NCT ID: NCT03910699
Last Updated: 2019-10-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
154 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-10
2020-10-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Trial Comparing Loop Ileostomy Versus Loop Transverse Colostomy
NCT05745909
PReventive cOlostomy vs Ileostomy in Low anTErior reCTal Resection
NCT04357171
Application of Left Colic Artery Preservation, Anastomotic Reinforcing Sutures and Transanal Tube in Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03609710
The Application Value of da Vinci Linear Cutting Stapler SureForm in Robotic Anus Preserving Surgery for Rectal Cancer
NCT05667181
The Effects of Temporary Ileostomy on Outcome in Patients With Rectal Cancer
NCT06391385
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
A three-row surgical stapler has recently been registered and approved for clinical use in Russia. The primary purpose of this study is to find out the rate of colorectal anastomosis leakage when using a three-row circular stapler and to demonstrate that it is at least not bigger than the rate of colorectal anastomosis leakage when using a two-row circular stapler.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Two-row anastomosis
Colorectal anastomosis is created with a two-row circular surgical stapler
Two-row circular stapler
Para-aortic lymph node dissection, inferior mesenteric artery skeletonisation and ligation below left colic artery origin, nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision, rectum division with a linear stapler, sigmoid colon division and circular stapler envil fixation with a purse-string suture, end-to-end colorectal anastomosis creation with a two-row circular stapler, defunctioning colostomy is performed.
Three-row anastomosis
Colorectal anastomosis is created with a three-row circular surgical stapler
Three-row circular stapler
Para-aortic lymph node dissection, inferior mesenteric artery skeletonisation and ligation below left colic artery origin, nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision, rectum division with a linear stapler, sigmoid colon division and circular stapler envil fixation with a purse-string suture, end-to-end colorectal anastomosis creation with a three-row circular stapler, defunctioning colostomy is performed.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Three-row circular stapler
Para-aortic lymph node dissection, inferior mesenteric artery skeletonisation and ligation below left colic artery origin, nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision, rectum division with a linear stapler, sigmoid colon division and circular stapler envil fixation with a purse-string suture, end-to-end colorectal anastomosis creation with a three-row circular stapler, defunctioning colostomy is performed.
Two-row circular stapler
Para-aortic lymph node dissection, inferior mesenteric artery skeletonisation and ligation below left colic artery origin, nerve-preserving total mesorectal excision, rectum division with a linear stapler, sigmoid colon division and circular stapler envil fixation with a purse-string suture, end-to-end colorectal anastomosis creation with a two-row circular stapler, defunctioning colostomy is performed.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Stated consent to comply with all study procedures and availability for the duration of the study
3. Male or female
4. For females of reproductive potential: not pregnant at the time of screening
5. For males of reproductive potential: use of condoms or other methods to ensure effective contraception with partner
6. Histologically proven primary rectal adenocarcinoma located within 5 to 15 cm from anal verge not involving internal and/or external sphincter muscle
1. Current use of antiplatelet drugs, acetylsalicylic acid or anticoagulants within 7 days prior to intervention
2. Unresectable tumour, inability to perform a TME with colorectal anastomosis, inability to complete R0 resection or presence of T4b tumour necessitating a multi-organ resection
3. Inability to save the left colic artery
4. Diameter of rectal lumen is unable to contain the working part of the stapler
5. Infection requiring antibiotic treatment within 30 days prior to intervention
6. Anal incontinence prior to surgery (Wexner Continence Grading Scale \>=10)
7. Significant comorbidities - ASA \> III
Exclusion Criteria
2. Inability to complete all the trial procedures
3. Death due to causes unrelated to anastomotic leak in early postoperative period
8\. Current smoker or tobacco use within \<specify timeframe\> 9. Patient wants to withdraw from the clinical trial
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Meril Life Sciences Pvt. Ltd.
INDUSTRY
I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
OTHER
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Inna Tulina
Head of Oncologic Colorectal Surgery Department, Clinic of Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Petr Tsarkov, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Russian Society of Colorectal Surgeons
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Clinic of Colorectal and Minimally Invasive Surgery - I.M. Sechenov First Moscow State Medical University
Moscow, , Russia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nekliudov NA, Tsarkov PV, Tulina IA. Uni-center, patient-blinded, randomized, 12-month, parallel group, noninferiority study to compare outcomes of 3-row vs 2-row circular staplers for colorectal anastomosis formation after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Jun;98(24):e15978. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000015978.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RSCS-Z0836
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.