Reinforced Versus Conventional Anastomosis in Laparoscopic Low Rectal Cancer Resection: A Comparative Study
NCT ID: NCT07346534
Last Updated: 2026-01-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION
NA
300 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2022-06-01
2026-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Reinforcement of the anastomotic site through additional interrupted suturing may provide better mechanical strength and improved healing, potentially reducing the incidence of anastomotic leakage and related morbidities. In this study, eligible patients will be assigned to receive either a conventional laparoscopic Dixon procedure or the same procedure with added reinforcement of the anastomosis using 8-10 interrupted sutures circumferentially.
Perioperative outcomes including the rate of anastomotic leakage, postoperative complications, operation time, length of hospital stay, return of bowel function, and quality of life will be assessed and compared between the two groups. The study seeks to provide evidence for optimizing surgical techniques in low rectal cancer treatment and improving patient prognosis.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Postoperative Anal Function Between Parks and Bacon Techniques in Low Rectal Cancer
NCT05943444
Conformal Sphincter-Preservation Operation Versus InterSphincteric Resection on Anal Function in Low Rectal Cancer
NCT06567756
Multiple Firings in Double-stapled Colorectal Anastomosis
NCT05498506
Prospective Phase II Study on Continuous Circumferential Reinforcement of Laparoscopic Rectal Anastomosis to Prevent Complications
NCT06495853
Application of Left Colic Artery Preservation, Anastomotic Reinforcing Sutures and Transanal Tube in Robotic Low Anterior Resection
NCT03609710
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Reinforced Anastomosis with 8-10 Interrupted Sutures
Patients in this group will undergo laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer, followed by reinforcement of the anastomosis using 8-10 interrupted seromuscular sutures circumferentially around the stapled anastomotic site. The reinforcement is intended to enhance anastomotic integrity and reduce the risk of leakage.
Reinforced Anastomotic Suturing (8-10 Interrupted Sutures)
After completing the laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer, the surgeon performs additional reinforcement of the colorectal anastomosis. This is done by placing 8 to 10 interrupted seromuscular sutures circumferentially around the anastomotic site. The goal of this reinforcement is to enhance anastomotic stability, promote healing, and reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage.
Conventional Dixon Procedure
Patients in this group will undergo standard laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer without additional reinforcement of the anastomosis. The anastomosis will be performed using a circular stapler alone, as per conventional practice.
Conventional Laparoscopic Dixon Procedure
Patients undergo standard laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer. The colorectal anastomosis is performed using a circular stapler without any additional suturing or reinforcement. This represents the conventional surgical approach widely used in clinical practice.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Reinforced Anastomotic Suturing (8-10 Interrupted Sutures)
After completing the laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer, the surgeon performs additional reinforcement of the colorectal anastomosis. This is done by placing 8 to 10 interrupted seromuscular sutures circumferentially around the anastomotic site. The goal of this reinforcement is to enhance anastomotic stability, promote healing, and reduce the risk of anastomotic leakage.
Conventional Laparoscopic Dixon Procedure
Patients undergo standard laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure) for low rectal cancer. The colorectal anastomosis is performed using a circular stapler without any additional suturing or reinforcement. This represents the conventional surgical approach widely used in clinical practice.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Diagnosed with low rectal adenocarcinoma located within 7 cm from the anal verge by colonoscopy and biopsy.
3. Scheduled for elective laparoscopic low anterior resection (Dixon procedure).
4. Clinical stage I-III (based on preoperative imaging, e.g., MRI/CT) without distant metastasis.
5. Adequate organ function (hematologic, hepatic, renal) to tolerate surgery.
6. Provided written informed consent and willing to comply with study procedures and follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
2. History of prior pelvic radiotherapy or major pelvic surgery.
3. Severe uncontrolled comorbidities (e.g., severe cardiovascular, respiratory, hepatic or renal insufficiency).
4. Emergency surgery indication (e.g., bowel obstruction, perforation).
5. Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
6. Known allergy or contraindication to anesthesia or surgical materials used.
7. Participation in another interventional clinical trial within the last 3 months.
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Shanghai 10th People's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Zhang Feng-Min
Investigator assistant
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital
Shanghai, , China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
25K50
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.