Neuromuscular Adaptations After Training in the Muscle Belly of Triceps Surae
NCT ID: NCT03905772
Last Updated: 2023-05-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
SUSPENDED
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-04-15
2023-12-01
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Influence of Electrode Positioning and Current Type on Fatigue, Force and Discomfort
NCT04200677
Effects of Kilohertz-frequency and Low-frequency Current on Triceps Surae
NCT05894044
Electrical Stimulation of the Quadriceps and Diaphragm in Critically Ill Patients
NCT03352102
MUSCLE EFFECTS OF NEUROMUSCULAR ELECTROSTIMULATION IN MECHANICALLY VENTILATED PATIENTS IN AN ICU
NCT06409611
Effects of Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation Parameters on Torque, Fatigue, and Oxygen Extraction
NCT05061056
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Voluntary exercise
The participants will perform 36 voluntary contractions of 20% of maximal voluntary isometrical contraction, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Voluntary exercise
The participants will perform 36 maximal voluntary contractions, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Wide pulse responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
This group will classified in responder in the acute fase.
Wide pulse responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks. This group will be classified in responder group in acute fase.
Wide pulse non responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
This group will classified in non responder in the acute fase.
Wide pulse non responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks. This group will be classified in non responder group in acute fase.
Pulsed current group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μs, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Pulsed current group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μs, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Voluntary exercise
The participants will perform 36 maximal voluntary contractions, 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Wide pulse responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks. This group will be classified in responder group in acute fase.
Wide pulse non responder group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 1 ms, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks. This group will be classified in non responder group in acute fase.
Pulsed current group
The participants will perform 36 contractions with the following current parameters: pulsed current (100 Hz, pulse duration 250 μs, Ton: 6 s, Toff: 18 s), 3 times per week for 8 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* To practice only recreational physical activity,
* Achieve minimum torque of 30% of the (maximal voluntary isometric contraction during conventional NMES
* Be at least 3 months without practicing strength training.
Exclusion Criteria
* Present intolerance to NMES in the muscular or tibial nerve, Make use of analgesics, antidepressants, tranquillizers or other agents of central action
* To present cardiovascular or peripheral vascular problems, chronic diseases, neurological or muscular affections that will undermine the complete execution of the study design by the volunteer.
18 Years
30 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Burgundy
OTHER
University of Brasilia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
João Luiz Q. Durigan
Physical Therapist Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
João Durigan, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
University of Brasilia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Faculty of Ceilandia UnB
Brasília, Federal District, Brazil
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Dirks ML, Hansen D, Van Assche A, Dendale P, Van Loon LJ. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation prevents muscle wasting in critically ill comatose patients. Clin Sci (Lond). 2015 Mar;128(6):357-65. doi: 10.1042/CS20140447.
Chae J, Sheffler L, Knutson J. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation for motor restoration in hemiplegia. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2008 Sep-Oct;15(5):412-26. doi: 10.1310/tsr1505-412.
Brocherie F, Babault N, Cometti G, Maffiuletti N, Chatard JC. Electrostimulation training effects on the physical performance of ice hockey players. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005 Mar;37(3):455-60. doi: 10.1249/01.mss.0000155396.51293.9f.
Billot M, Martin A, Paizis C, Cometti C, Babault N. Effects of an electrostimulation training program on strength, jumping, and kicking capacities in soccer players. J Strength Cond Res. 2010 May;24(5):1407-13. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181d43790.
Medeiros FV, Bottaro M, Vieira A, Lucas TP, Modesto KA, Bo APL, Cipriano G Jr, Babault N, Durigan JLQ. Kilohertz and Low-Frequency Electrical Stimulation With the Same Pulse Duration Have Similar Efficiency for Inducing Isometric Knee Extension Torque and Discomfort. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2017 Jun;96(6):388-394. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0000000000000631.
Vaz MA, Baroni BM, Geremia JM, Lanferdini FJ, Mayer A, Arampatzis A, Herzog W. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) reduces structural and functional losses of quadriceps muscle and improves health status in patients with knee osteoarthritis. J Orthop Res. 2013 Apr;31(4):511-6. doi: 10.1002/jor.22264. Epub 2012 Nov 8.
Gondin J, Brocca L, Bellinzona E, D'Antona G, Maffiuletti NA, Miotti D, Pellegrino MA, Bottinelli R. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation training induces atypical adaptations of the human skeletal muscle phenotype: a functional and proteomic analysis. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Feb;110(2):433-50. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00914.2010. Epub 2010 Dec 2.
Ward AR, Robertson VJ. The variation in fatigue rate with frequency using kHz frequency alternating current. Med Eng Phys. 2000 Nov;22(9):637-46. doi: 10.1016/s1350-4533(00)00085-0.
Ward AR, Chuen WL. Lowering of sensory, motor, and pain-tolerance thresholds with burst duration using kilohertz-frequency alternating current electric stimulation: part II. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Sep;90(9):1619-27. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2009.02.022.
Ward AR, Robertson VJ, Ioannou H. The effect of duty cycle and frequency on muscle torque production using kilohertz frequency range alternating current. Med Eng Phys. 2004 Sep;26(7):569-79. doi: 10.1016/j.medengphy.2004.04.007.
Paillard T, Noe F, Bernard N, Dupui P, Hazard C. Effects of two types of neuromuscular electrical stimulation training on vertical jump performance. J Strength Cond Res. 2008 Jul;22(4):1273-8. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e3181739e9c.
Filipovic A, Kleinoder H, Dormann U, Mester J. Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the influence of training regimens and stimulation parameters on effectiveness in electromyostimulation training of selected strength parameters. J Strength Cond Res. 2011 Nov;25(11):3218-38. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e318212e3ce.
Filipovic A, Kleinoder H, Dormann U, Mester J. Electromyostimulation--a systematic review of the effects of different electromyostimulation methods on selected strength parameters in trained and elite athletes. J Strength Cond Res. 2012 Sep;26(9):2600-14. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0b013e31823f2cd1.
Selkowitz DM, Rossman EG, Fitzpatrick S. Effect of burst-modulated alternating current carrier frequency on current amplitude required to produce maximally tolerated electrically stimulated quadriceps femoris knee extension torque. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2009 Dec;88(12):973-8. doi: 10.1097/PHM.0b013e3181c1eda5.
Binder-Macleod SA, Halden EE, Jungles KA. Effects of stimulation intensity on the physiological responses of human motor units. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1995 Apr;27(4):556-65.
Gorgey AS, Black CD, Elder CP, Dudley GA. Effects of electrical stimulation parameters on fatigue in skeletal muscle. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2009 Sep;39(9):684-92. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2009.3045.
Gorgey AS, Dudley GA. The role of pulse duration and stimulation duration in maximizing the normalized torque during neuromuscular electrical stimulation. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2008 Aug;38(8):508-16. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2008.2734. Epub 2008 Aug 1.
Bax L, Staes F, Verhagen A. Does neuromuscular electrical stimulation strengthen the quadriceps femoris? A systematic review of randomised controlled trials. Sports Med. 2005;35(3):191-212. doi: 10.2165/00007256-200535030-00002.
Ward AR, Oliver WG, Buccella D. Wrist extensor torque production and discomfort associated with low-frequency and burst-modulated kilohertz-frequency currents. Phys Ther. 2006 Oct;86(10):1360-7. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20050300.
Laufer Y, Elboim M. Effect of burst frequency and duration of kilohertz-frequency alternating currents and of low-frequency pulsed currents on strength of contraction, muscle fatigue, and perceived discomfort. Phys Ther. 2008 Oct;88(10):1167-76. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20080001. Epub 2008 Aug 14.
Dantas LO, Vieira A, Siqueira AL Jr, Salvini TF, Durigan JL. Comparison between the effects of 4 different electrical stimulation current waveforms on isometric knee extension torque and perceived discomfort in healthy women. Muscle Nerve. 2015 Jan;51(1):76-82. doi: 10.1002/mus.24280.
Bergquist AJ, Wiest MJ, Collins DF. Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: quadriceps femoris. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2012 Jul;113(1):78-89. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00074.2011. Epub 2012 May 3.
Maffiuletti NA. Physiological and methodological considerations for the use of neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2010 Sep;110(2):223-34. doi: 10.1007/s00421-010-1502-y. Epub 2010 May 15.
Barss TS, Ainsley EN, Claveria-Gonzalez FC, Luu MJ, Miller DJ, Wiest MJ, Collins DF. Utilizing Physiological Principles of Motor Unit Recruitment to Reduce Fatigability of Electrically-Evoked Contractions: A Narrative Review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2018 Apr;99(4):779-791. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2017.08.478. Epub 2017 Sep 19.
Gregory CM, Bickel CS. Recruitment patterns in human skeletal muscle during electrical stimulation. Phys Ther. 2005 Apr;85(4):358-64.
Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Collins DF. Motor unit recruitment when neuromuscular electrical stimulation is applied over a nerve trunk compared with a muscle belly: triceps surae. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Mar;110(3):627-37. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.01103.2010. Epub 2010 Dec 23.
Bergquist AJ, Clair JM, Lagerquist O, Mang CS, Okuma Y, Collins DF. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation: implications of the electrically evoked sensory volley. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct;111(10):2409-26. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2087-9. Epub 2011 Jul 30.
da Silva VZ, Durigan JL, Arena R, de Noronha M, Gurney B, Cipriano G Jr. Current evidence demonstrates similar effects of kilohertz-frequency and low-frequency current on quadriceps evoked torque and discomfort in healthy individuals: a systematic review with meta-analysis. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(8):533-9. doi: 10.3109/09593985.2015.1064191. Epub 2015 Oct 14.
Maffiuletti NA, Cometti G, Amiridis IG, Martin A, Pousson M, Chatard JC. The effects of electromyostimulation training and basketball practice on muscle strength and jumping ability. Int J Sports Med. 2000 Aug;21(6):437-43. doi: 10.1055/s-2000-3837.
Flann KL, LaStayo PC, McClain DA, Hazel M, Lindstedt SL. Muscle damage and muscle remodeling: no pain, no gain? J Exp Biol. 2011 Feb 15;214(Pt 4):674-9. doi: 10.1242/jeb.050112.
Jenkins NDM, Miramonti AA, Hill EC, Smith CM, Cochrane-Snyman KC, Housh TJ, Cramer JT. Greater Neural Adaptations following High- vs. Low-Load Resistance Training. Front Physiol. 2017 May 29;8:331. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00331. eCollection 2017.
Oliveira P, Modesto KAG, Bottaro M, Babault N, Durigan JLQ. Training Effects of Alternated and Pulsed Currents on the Quadriceps Muscles of Athletes. Int J Sports Med. 2018 Jul;39(7):535-540. doi: 10.1055/a-0601-6742. Epub 2018 May 22.
Blazevich AJ, Gill ND, Zhou S. Intra- and intermuscular variation in human quadriceps femoris architecture assessed in vivo. J Anat. 2006 Sep;209(3):289-310. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7580.2006.00619.x.
Morse CI, Thom JM, Birch KM, Narici MV. Changes in triceps surae muscle architecture with sarcopenia. Acta Physiol Scand. 2005 Mar;183(3):291-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-201X.2004.01404.x.
Grospretre S, Jacquet T, Lebon F, Papaxanthis C, Martin A. Neural mechanisms of strength increase after one-week motor imagery training. Eur J Sport Sci. 2018 Mar;18(2):209-218. doi: 10.1080/17461391.2017.1415377. Epub 2017 Dec 17.
Hermens HJ, Freriks B, Disselhorst-Klug C, Rau G. Development of recommendations for SEMG sensors and sensor placement procedures. J Electromyogr Kinesiol. 2000 Oct;10(5):361-74. doi: 10.1016/s1050-6411(00)00027-4.
Duclay J, Martin A. Evoked H-reflex and V-wave responses during maximal isometric, concentric, and eccentric muscle contraction. J Neurophysiol. 2005 Nov;94(5):3555-62. doi: 10.1152/jn.00348.2005. Epub 2005 Jul 27.
Babault N, Pousson M, Michaut A, Van Hoecke J. Effect of quadriceps femoris muscle length on neural activation during isometric and concentric contractions. J Appl Physiol (1985). 2003 Mar;94(3):983-90. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00717.2002. Epub 2002 Nov 15.
Kent-Braun JA. Central and peripheral contributions to muscle fatigue in humans during sustained maximal effort. Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1999 Jun;80(1):57-63. doi: 10.1007/s004210050558.
Pajoutan M, Ghesmaty Sangachin M, Cavuoto LA. Central and peripheral fatigue development in the shoulder muscle with obesity during an isometric endurance task. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jul 21;18(1):314. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1676-0.
Botter A, Oprandi G, Lanfranco F, Allasia S, Maffiuletti NA, Minetto MA. Atlas of the muscle motor points for the lower limb: implications for electrical stimulation procedures and electrode positioning. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2011 Oct;111(10):2461-71. doi: 10.1007/s00421-011-2093-y. Epub 2011 Jul 28.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
01326818.8.0000.8093
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.