Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation in ICU Patients

NCT ID: NCT04332263

Last Updated: 2024-06-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

56 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-03-01

Study Completion Date

2024-06-06

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with conventional physiotherapy (Experimental Group), compared to conventional physiotherapy only (Control Group) in critically ill Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients, by means of a randomized controlled clinical trial. The investigators expect that the NMES program will be able to reduce muscle structure and function losses compared to control group, and will improve muscle quality faster, will reduce the ventilation time and the total time spent at the ICU, as well as improve functionality of these patients. In addition, the researchers expect to understand which mechanisms determine such adaptations in the musculoskeletal system of these patients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The aim of the present study is to evaluate the effects of neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) combined with conventional physiotherapy (Experimental Group), compared to conventional physiotherapy only (Control Group) in critically ill ICU patients, by means of a randomized controlled clinical trial. Primary outcomes evaluated during ICU patient's hospitalization are (1) the time spent in the ICU; (2) time of mechanical ventilation; (3) time and success of weaning (up to 48 hours), (4) the isometric torque from contractions artificially generated by NMES and evaluated by dynamometry; (5) muscle morphology and quality by means of ultrasonography. Secondary outcomes include (6) the sit and stand test; (7) gait speed test; (8) autonomic control (heart rate variability); (9) peripheral polyneuropathy by means of MRC scale; (10) Inflammatory profile - inflammatory (IL-6 and TNF-α) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokines; (11) blood muscular biochemical markers (IGF1, LDH, CK); (12) predictive mortality index for patients admitted to the ICU (SAPS 3); (13) survival rate; and (14) mobility (PERME). After discharge from the ICU or as soon as the patients are able to perform force voluntarily, the maximum voluntary torque will also be evaluated by means of dynamometry. Also, clinical data, hemodynamic variables, dosage of neuromuscular blockers and corticosteroids, blood glucose levels in the morning, daily water balance, oxygenation index, arterial blood gases, mechanical ventilator parameters, Glasgow scale, sedation scale (RASS), will be recorded daily. The investigators expect that the NMES program will be able to reduce muscle structure and function losses compared to control group, and will improve muscle quality, will reduce the ventilation time and the total time spent at the ICU, as well as improve functionality of these patients. In addition, the researchers expect to understand which mechanisms determine such adaptations in the musculoskeletal system of these patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Intensive Care Unit Acquired Weakness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The present study is a randomized controlled trial, which followed the recommendations proposed by the CONSORT Statement
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Investigators Outcome Assessors
Patients will be randomized through data generated by a computer program containing the coded distribution (Randomizer, USA). The software takes into account one of the main objectives of randomization, which is to prevent the researcher from identifying which intervention will be performed on each patient. A researcher blinded to the study will do the generation of the sequence of numbers, after the patients' selection by the inclusion and exclusion criteria. The numbers sequence used for randomization will be kept confidential until the exact moment of the beginning of the intervention. In addition, a second blinded researcher, who will not be aware of the subjects' names in the three experimental groups, will perform the data analysis.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation - NMES

NMES will be applied bilaterally on the quadriceps femoris muscle of ICU patients. An electrical stimulation system and an ICU-designed dynamometer will be used with the patients lying in bed, with the hips and the knees flexed at 60 and 90 degrees, respectively. Supramaximal single-pulse's peak force will be used to determine the NMES intervention level. NMES (alternating biphasic current, stimulation frequency = 80 Hz, 1 ms pulse duration) will be used to evoke tetanic forces (EF) at 50% of the supra-maximal single-pulse EF (i.e., 10-12% of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction). NMES protocol will be performed five times a week, lasting 20 min. Muscle fatigue will be evaluated every 5 min of the intervention, and will be determined as a 10 % decrease in the single-pulse evoked torque between the evoked force produced pre- and during the NMES protocol. If and when a 10% reduction of the single-pulse EF is achieved, the intervention protocol will be terminated before the 20 min.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation - NMES

Intervention Type OTHER

NMES will be applied through an alternating biphasic current, with a stimulation frequency of 80 Hz and 1 ms pulse duration. Tetanic evoke forces (EF) at a 50% level of a supra-maximal single-pulse peak EF (i.e., 10-12% of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction) will be used. NMES protocol will be performed five times a week, lasting 20 minutes. Muscle fatigue will be evaluated every 5 min of the intervention, and will be used to determine the NMES protocol termination. A 10 % decrease in the single-pulse evoked torque between the evoked force produced pre- and during the NMES protocol will be used to terminate the fatigue protocol.

Control Group - CG

The control group (CG) will only perform conventional physiotherapy and will not receive any NMES training, but will be evaluated through the same evaluations and in the same moments of the two above mentioned intervention groups. Conventional physiotherapy will be given to all three groups.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Neuromuscular Electrical Stimulation - NMES

NMES will be applied through an alternating biphasic current, with a stimulation frequency of 80 Hz and 1 ms pulse duration. Tetanic evoke forces (EF) at a 50% level of a supra-maximal single-pulse peak EF (i.e., 10-12% of a maximal voluntary isometric contraction) will be used. NMES protocol will be performed five times a week, lasting 20 minutes. Muscle fatigue will be evaluated every 5 min of the intervention, and will be used to determine the NMES protocol termination. A 10 % decrease in the single-pulse evoked torque between the evoked force produced pre- and during the NMES protocol will be used to terminate the fatigue protocol.

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Artificial electrical stimulation

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patients with any clinical condition hospitalized in the ICU, which are monitored by the Physiotherapy Service:
* Cerebrovascular diseases
* Other bacterial diseases
* Circulatory and respiratory diseases
* Digestive and abdominal diseases
* Liver diseases
* Time between the patient's ICU entry and the onset of the NMES intervention less than one week.

Patients may be in mechanical ventilation, non-invasive ventilation, oxygen therapy or oxygen ambient ventilation (no ventilatory add). Patients re-admitted to the ICU within the same hospitalization period (i.e., did not leave the hospital) may also be included, as well as patients with previous tracheostomy.

Exclusion Criteria

* Previously diagnosed neuromuscular diseases:
* ALS
* Guillain Barre
* Chronic stroke
* TRM
* End-stage malignant disease
* Lower limbs' amputation
* Body mass index above 40 kg/m2
* Cachexia (defined as the presence of chronic disease and weight loss ≥ 5% in a period shorter than 12 months or BMI \< 20 kg/m2, associated with at least three of the following criteria: (1) decreased muscle strength; (2) fatigue; (3) anorexia; (4) reduction of fat free mass index; and (5) biochemical abnormalities such as inflammation, anemia or reduction of serum albumin concentration).
* Lesions on the skin at the electrode placement and/or dynamometer support points
* Post-operative transplantation
* Patients using a neuromuscular blocker
* Hemodynamic instability (nora \> 10; ABCDE criteria)
* Height \< 1.50m
* Rhabdomyolysis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Marco Aurélio Vaz, PhD

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Marco A Vaz, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Federal University of Rio Grande do Sul

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

36588914.4.1001.5347

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.