Efficacy of Guided Tissue Regeneration in the Healing of Periapical Defects With Periodontal Communication Using CBCT

NCT ID: NCT03905590

Last Updated: 2019-04-05

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-01-01

Study Completion Date

2019-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Healing of the Apicomarginal defects will be checked by comparing 2 groups . In first group amniotic membrane will be applied over the defect before flap closure during surgery and in second group no GTR material will be applied. Healing of the lesions will also be compared 2 dimensionaly and 3 dimensionaly using CBCT

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Study Title: - To evaluate the efficacy of guided tissue regeneration in the healing of periapical defects with periodontal communication: A randomized controlled trial with 3D analysis using CBCT.

Rationale: - Healing of lesions with apicomarginal defects is often less satisfactory. Various studies and case reports have reported high success rate with the use of guided tissue regeneration technique. Only few clinical trials have evaluated the effect of guided tissue regeneration on the healing of apicomarginal defects. To best of our knowledge only two studies have conducted randomized controlled trial. However, no study has used CBCT for the assessment of healing in such type of lesions. So, this is the first randomized controlled trial studying the effect of guided tissue regeneration in the healing of periapical defects with periodontal communication using 3D radiological evaluation using CBCT.

Aim \& Objectives: - 1. To evaluate the difference in the healing outcome of periapical defects with periodontal communication with or without the use of guided tissue regeneration technique 2. To evaluate the difference in the healing outcome derived from the assessment of 2D periapical radiographs and 3 D CBCT imaging.

Setting: - Study will be conducted in Post Graduate Institute of Dental Sciences, Rohtak in the department of Conservative Dentistry \& Endodontics.

Study Design: - A randomized controlled trial Time Frame: - 12 to 18 months Population / Participants: - Patients of age 16 years (male/female) and above will be enrolled in the study.

Inclusion criteria: - Patients of age 16 years and above, Patients with no general medical contraindications for oral surgical procedures (ASA-I and ASA-II according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologist's, periapical defect with periodontal communication, periodontal pocket \>6mm with apicomarginal communication confined to buccal aspect of interproximal space or mid buccal aspect of the root ., -ve response to vitality test, failed previous root canal treatment with purulent discharge or failed previous surgery or recurrent episode of purulent discharge.

Exclusion criteria: -Presence of buccal bone on flap elevation, Unrestorable tooth, fractured /perforated roots, smokers, pregnant females and lactating mothers.

Sample size: - 30 patients (15 patients in each group) Methods: - Diagnosis of the lesion will be made clinically and radiographically, vitality will be checked by EPT, preoperative clinical evaluation will include, clinical attachment level, gingival marginal position and pocket depth. Marginal bone loss, width of bony crypt, height of the bony crypt, depth of the crypt and height of the buccal bone plate (if present) will be measured radiographically and at the time of surgery. Surgical procedures will be carried out under operating microscope with 8 × 16 magnification by the standardized treatment methods.

Outcome measures: - Follow up of patients will be carried out at 3, 6, 9 \& 12 months and outcome measures will be assessed clinically by absence of signs and symptoms and 2 dimensionally using radiographs by Rud and Molven criteria for periapical healing and 3 dimensionaly using CBCT by modified PENN criteria at 12 months follow up for periapical healing and buccal bone level.

Statistical method: - The data will be entered into Microsoft Excel and analysed using SPSS (Statistical Package for Social Science) package for relevant statistical comparison. Distribution of data into normal and non-normal will be done by Kolmogorov-Smir-Nov test. If the data will be normal then student T test and paired T test will be applied for unpaired and paired data respectively. For categorical data Chi - square test will be applied. The interobserver analysis will be done by cohen kappa analysis.

If the data will be non-normal then Mann - Whitney and Wilcoxon rank sum test will be applied for unpaired and paired data respectively. For categorical data Chi - square test will be applied. The interobserver analysis will be done by cohen kappa analysis.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Apico Marginal Defects

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
double

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

periapical surgery with amniotic membrane

periapical surgery will be done and amniotic membrane will be placed over the defect before closure of flap

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Periapical surgery with amniotic membrane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

periapical surgery will be done followed by amniotic membrane placement over the defect

periapical surgery without amniotic membrane

periapical surgery will be done without the placement of amniotic membrane over the defect before closure of flap

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

periapical surgery without amniotic membrane

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

periapical surgery will be done without placement of membrane over the defect.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Periapical surgery with amniotic membrane

periapical surgery will be done followed by amniotic membrane placement over the defect

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

periapical surgery without amniotic membrane

periapical surgery will be done without placement of membrane over the defect.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients of age 16 years and above.
2. Patients with no general medical contraindications for oral surgical procedures (ASA-I and ASA-II according to the classification of the American Society of Anesthesiologist's.
3. periapical defect with periodontal communication.
4. Periodontal pocket \>6mm with apicomarginal communication confined to buccal aspect of interproximal space or mid buccal aspect of the root.
5. Negative response to vitality test.
6. failed previous root canal treatment with purulent discharge or failed previous surgery or recurrent episode of purulent discharge.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Presence of buccal bone on flap elevation.
2. Unrestorable tooth.
3. fractured /perforated roots.
4. smokers.
5. pregnant females and lactating mothers

.
Minimum Eligible Age

16 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Postgraduate Institute of Dental Sciences Rohtak

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Post Graduate Institute of Dental Science

Rohtak, Haryana, India

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

India

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RITIKA YADAV

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.