22G-ProCore vs 22G-Standard Needle in Diagnosis of Lymphadenopathy by EBUS-TBNA

NCT ID: NCT03903471

Last Updated: 2022-09-29

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

600 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-10-08

Study Completion Date

2023-10-08

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to compare the performance of 22G-ProCore and 22G-Standard needle in diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy via EBUS-TBNA with the purpose to explore the optimal technique for obtaining diagnostic material.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

EBUS-TBNA is an important minimally invasive tool for the diagnosis of mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy. The investigators will explore the performance of two kinds of needles and different methods to obtain tissues via EBUS-TBNA in the study. The study is designed as a prospective, single-center, randomized controlled trial, 600 patients will be expected to enroll in the study and randomly assigned to two groups, the 22G-ProCore group and the 22G-Standard group. The primary aim is to compare the diagnostic yields of the two types of needles. The secondary endpoint is to assess the quality of histologic specimen. Meanwhile, stylet slow-pull or negative suction techniques and different agitations (10, 20, 30 times) that each pass includes will be evaluated in the study as well.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lymph Node Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

22G-ProCore Group

The experimental group with 22G-ProCore needle is expected to enroll 300 patients. The 22G-ProCore needle has a 1.5mm long groove 2.5mm above the needle tip, which is expected to have the advantage of taking more biopsy tissues than the 22G-Standard needle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

22G-ProCore Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

EchoTip Procore® Endobronchial HD Ultrasound Biopsy Needle, COOK

22G-Standard Group

The control group of 22G-Standard needle is expected to include 300 patients, and there is no groove above the needle tip compared with 22G-ProCore needle.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

22G-Standard Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle

Intervention Type DEVICE

EchoTip® Ultra Endobronchial High Definition Ultrasound Needle, COOK

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

22G-ProCore Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle

EchoTip Procore® Endobronchial HD Ultrasound Biopsy Needle, COOK

Intervention Type DEVICE

22G-Standard Endobronchial Ultrasound Needle

EchoTip® Ultra Endobronchial High Definition Ultrasound Needle, COOK

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Imaging examination indicates enlarged intrathoracic lymph nodes need pathological diagnosis (any lymph node has a short diameter \> 1 cm in CT or PET-CT SUV value \> 2.5).
2. Accessible mediastinal and hilar lymphadenopathy to EBUS-TBNA.
3. Inform consent signed.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Contraindications of EBUS-TBNA. Such as use of anticoagulant therapy or presence of a coagulopathy (platelet count \< 50000 or INR \> 1.5).
2. Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction and other indications that can't tolerate bronchoscopy.
3. Life expectancy less than 6 months.
4. Uncooperative patients.
5. Patients representing vulnerable populations (prisoners, pregnant women, etc).
6. Researchers consider it inappropriate to participate in this study.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jiayuan Sun

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jiayuan Sun

Director, Department of Respiratory Endoscopy and Interventional Pulmonology, Shanghai Chest Hospital

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jiayuan Sun, MD,PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Shanghai Chest Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shanghai Chest Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Jiayuan Sun, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+86-021-22200000 ext. 1511

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jiayuan Sun, PhD

Role: primary

+86-021-22200000 ext. 1511

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Stamatis G. Staging of lung cancer: the role of noninvasive, minimally invasive and invasive techniques. Eur Respir J. 2015 Aug;46(2):521-31. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00126714. Epub 2015 May 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25976686 (View on PubMed)

Sun J, Zhang J, Zhao H, Shen J, Gu A, Han B. Role of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in the diagnosis of bronchogenic carcinoma: Experience of a single institution in China. Thorac Cancer. 2010 May;1(1):28-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1759-7714.2010.00010.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27755785 (View on PubMed)

Sun J, Teng J, Yang H, Li Z, Zhang J, Zhao H, Garfield DH, Han B. Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing intrathoracic tuberculosis. Ann Thorac Surg. 2013 Dec;96(6):2021-7. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.07.005. Epub 2013 Sep 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24035300 (View on PubMed)

Sun J, Yang H, Teng J, Zhang J, Zhao H, Garfield DH, Han B. Determining factors in diagnosing pulmonary sarcoidosis by endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Feb;99(2):441-5. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.09.029. Epub 2014 Dec 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25497069 (View on PubMed)

Yang H, Wang S, Teng J, Han B, Sun J. Utility of endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration in diagnosing non-specific inflammatory intrathorcacic lymphadenitis. Clin Respir J. 2018 Feb;12(2):691-698. doi: 10.1111/crj.12580. Epub 2016 Nov 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27882677 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SHCHE201901

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EBUS-TBNA vs Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA
NCT02592837 COMPLETED NA
EBUS-TBNA Versus EBUS-TBNB
NCT01467635 WITHDRAWN NA
EBUS-TBNA vs Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA
NCT02916459 UNKNOWN NA