Comparison of Three Different Puncture Techniques in EBUS-TBNA

NCT ID: NCT05628454

Last Updated: 2025-04-30

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

75 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2022-11-08

Study Completion Date

2024-11-01

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study was to compare the accuracy and sensitivity of slow-pull capillary technique, traditional suction aspiration and non negative pressure puncture in the diagnosis of mediastinal and/or hilar lymph node enlargement by ultrasound bronchoscopic lymph node biopsy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

EBUS-TBNA has been widely used in the diagnosis of diseases involving lung hilar and mediastinal lymph node enlargement.But different puncture methods are still controversial. Research shows that there was no significant difference in sample adequacy, diagnostic specificity and accuracy between the no negative pressure aspiration and traditional negative pressure aspiration technique.Slow-pull capillary technique is a relatively new operating method of endoscopic ultrasound guided fine needle biopsy in recent years. At present, this technology is widely used in pancreatic space occupying lesions. Compared with the traditional negative pressure aspiration method, our previous retrospective study found that the slow-pull capillary technique can improve the diagnostic accuracy of patients. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to prospectively and randomly compare the advantages and disadvantages of three puncture methods in EBUS-TBNA.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Cancer Sarcoidosis Tuberculosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
The operator knows which puncture technique to be used, but the subject and the outcomes assessor does not know the technique.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

EBUS-TBNSP

The slow-pull capillary technique was performed as follows: after identification and measurement of the target lymph node, a needle was used to puncture the lymph node with the stylet in place.At the same time, the stylet was slowly and continuously pulled to create weak negative pressure.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle Slow-pull capillary sampling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The slow-pull capillary technique was performed as follows: after identification and measurement of the target lymph node, a needle was used to puncture the lymph node with the stylet in place.At the same time, the stylet was slowly and continuously pulled to create weak negative pressure.

EBUS-TBNA

The operation steps are the same as above, but the negative pressure device of 10ml syringe is connected behind the puncture needle.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The operation steps are the same as above, but the negative pressure device of 10ml syringe is connected behind the puncture needle.

EBUS-TBNCS

The operation steps are the same as above, but there is no negative pressure device behind the puncture needle

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle capillary sampling

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The operation steps are the same as above, but there is no negative pressure device behind the puncture needle

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle Slow-pull capillary sampling

The slow-pull capillary technique was performed as follows: after identification and measurement of the target lymph node, a needle was used to puncture the lymph node with the stylet in place.At the same time, the stylet was slowly and continuously pulled to create weak negative pressure.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle aspiration

The operation steps are the same as above, but the negative pressure device of 10ml syringe is connected behind the puncture needle.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Endobronchial ultrasound-guided transbronchial needle capillary sampling

The operation steps are the same as above, but there is no negative pressure device behind the puncture needle

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Slow-pull capillary technique Standard suction Fine needle sampling without suction

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-80years
* Chest computed tomography showing hilar or mediastinal lymph node enlargement
* No contraindications for bronchoscopy
* Signed informed consent provided by the patient
* Disease needs to be diagnosed through the EBUS-TBNA

Exclusion Criteria

* Severe coagulation dysfunction
* Severe cardiopulmonary dysfunction
* Acute asthma attack or massive haemoptysis
* Poor general condition
* Physical weakness without tolerance for anaesthesia or allergy to narcotic drug
* Disease can be diagnosed by other less invasive methods (such as skin or peripheral superficial lymph node biopsy)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Friendship Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Yanjun Wu

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Zhigang Yao

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Beijing Friendship Hospital

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University

Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wu Y, Xu R, Duan X, Deng Y, Yu G, He X, Yao Z. Comparison of three different puncture techniques for endobronchial ultrasound transbronchial needle aspiration: a single-center, prospective, randomized controlled study. BMC Pulm Med. 2025 Sep 30;25(1):437. doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03917-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 41029266 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BFH20221019005

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

EBUS-TBNA Versus EBUS-TBNB
NCT01467635 WITHDRAWN NA
EBUS-TBNA vs Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA
NCT02592837 COMPLETED NA
EBUS-TBNA vs Acquire TBNB
NCT04200105 UNKNOWN NA
EBUS-TBNA vs Flex 19G EBUS-TBNA
NCT02916459 UNKNOWN NA