Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
30 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-05-24
2020-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Oxytocin Induction in Full Term Pregnant Women With Cesarean Section of Prelabor Rupture of Membranes
NCT05333731
Oxytocin Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics
NCT05488457
Oxytocin Administration During Cesarean Section
NCT03344302
Oxytocin to Decrease Blood Loss During Cesarean Section
NCT00891150
Outcomes After the Implementation of a New Oxytocin Protocol
NCT02722356
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
BMI 20 - 29.9 kg/m2
oxytocin
PK measurements of oxytocin
Shore durometer
The investigators will take serial readings from a digital durometer at the uterine fundus at 3, 6, 9 and 12 minutes following OXT administration to provide data that will inform an estimate of the timing of peak effect. Shore durometers measure the hardness of materials on a scale of 0-100 Shore Units (SU). Preliminary (unpublished) data provided a range of 10-56 SU after oxytocin administration at cesarean delivery. Durometer readings were also shown to correlate positively with the obstetrician's manual assessment of uterine contractility, which is traditionally used to determine the success or failure of uterotonic therapy.
BMI > 30 kg/m2
oxytocin
PK measurements of oxytocin
Shore durometer
The investigators will take serial readings from a digital durometer at the uterine fundus at 3, 6, 9 and 12 minutes following OXT administration to provide data that will inform an estimate of the timing of peak effect. Shore durometers measure the hardness of materials on a scale of 0-100 Shore Units (SU). Preliminary (unpublished) data provided a range of 10-56 SU after oxytocin administration at cesarean delivery. Durometer readings were also shown to correlate positively with the obstetrician's manual assessment of uterine contractility, which is traditionally used to determine the success or failure of uterotonic therapy.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
oxytocin
PK measurements of oxytocin
Shore durometer
The investigators will take serial readings from a digital durometer at the uterine fundus at 3, 6, 9 and 12 minutes following OXT administration to provide data that will inform an estimate of the timing of peak effect. Shore durometers measure the hardness of materials on a scale of 0-100 Shore Units (SU). Preliminary (unpublished) data provided a range of 10-56 SU after oxytocin administration at cesarean delivery. Durometer readings were also shown to correlate positively with the obstetrician's manual assessment of uterine contractility, which is traditionally used to determine the success or failure of uterotonic therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age 18-45 years of age
* ASA classification 2 or 3
* Scheduled cesarean delivery under neuraxial anaesthesia
* Need for general anaesthesia
* Absence of consent
* Inability to communicate in English or other barrier to providing informed consent
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Washington University School of Medicine
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David T Monks, MBChB
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University in St. Louis
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Say L, Chou D, Gemmill A, Tuncalp O, Moller AB, Daniels J, Gulmezoglu AM, Temmerman M, Alkema L. Global causes of maternal death: a WHO systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70227-X. Epub 2014 May 5.
Attilakos G, Psaroudakis D, Ash J, Buchanan R, Winter C, Donald F, Hunt LP, Draycott T. Carbetocin versus oxytocin for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following caesarean section: the results of a double-blind randomised trial. BJOG. 2010 Jul;117(8):929-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.2010.02585.x. Epub 2010 May 19.
Chiou WL. The phenomenon and rationale of marked dependence of drug concentration on blood sampling site. Implications in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology and therapeutics (Part II). Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989 Oct;17(4):275-90. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198917040-00005. No abstract available.
Chiou WL. The phenomenon and rationale of marked dependence of drug concentration on blood sampling site. Implications in pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, toxicology and therapeutics (Part I). Clin Pharmacokinet. 1989 Sep;17(3):175-99. doi: 10.2165/00003088-198917030-00004.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
201810134
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.