Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control Pragmatic Clinical Trial
NCT ID: NCT03892967
Last Updated: 2025-10-07
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
50207 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-03-28
2023-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Electronic Symptom Monitoring Program for Triggered Palliative Referrals in Patients With Thoracic Cancer
NCT06396598
Electronic Patient Reporting of Symptoms During Cancer Treatment
NCT03249090
Pilot Trial of Virtual and In-person STEP2
NCT06326554
SymptomCare@Home: Deconstructing an Effective Symptom Management Intervention
NCT02779725
Oncology Associated Symptoms & Individualized Strategies
NCT03122249
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. Conduct a cluster randomized pragmatic trial with a stepped wedge design to test the hypothesis that a symptom control-focused enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) intervention will significantly reduce sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE) symptom and physical dysfunction scores, reduce unplanned hospitalizations and emergency department visits, improve adherence to cancer therapies, and improve self-reported quality of life.
II. Evaluate the hypothesis that use of a multifaceted, evidence-based implementation strategy to support adoption and use of the E2C2 system will result in improvements in implementation and clinical outcomes.
III. Conduct a mixed methods evaluation to detect, understand and reduce disparities in the adoption and implementation of the E2C2 intervention among elderly and rural-dwelling patients with cancer.
OUTLINE:
The first Primary Objective involves a stepped wedge enrollment into the study intervention. Involvement is based off the patients' responses to the pain questionnaire (low pain = no involvement, moderate pain = offer of patient education materials, severe pain = involvement of a Symptom Care Manager). Symptom Care Managers will work with interested patients who endorse high pain to help address and manage their pain. The third objective involves a subset of patients included in the E2C2 who are offered to participate in a one-time interview lasting 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also will be invited to participate in an interview lasting 15-30 minutes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Supportive care (interview)
Patients randomized to E2C2 intervention participate in an interview over 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also participate in an interview over 15-30 minutes.
Interview
Participate in interview
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Interview
Participate in interview
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Ancillary studies
Questionnaire Administration
Ancillary studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
NIH
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Andrea L Cheville
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic in Rochester
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Finney Rutten LJ, Ruddy KJ, Chlan LL, Griffin JM, Herrin J, Leppin AL, Pachman DR, Ridgeway JL, Rahman PA, Storlie CB, Wilson PM, Cheville AL. Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of enhanced EHR-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2). Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04335-w.
Minteer SA, Ridgeway JL, Pachman DR, Austin JD, Griffin JM, Ruddy KJ, Cheville AL. Barriers and facilitators to using practice facilitators to implement a remote cancer symptom management intervention: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13378-1.
Kuharic M, Merle JL, Cella D, Mitchell SA, DiMartino L, Ridgeway JL, Dizon DS, Paudel R, Austin JD, Wong SL, Flores AM, Cheville AL, Smith JD; IMPACT Consortium. Psychometric evaluation of the NoMAD instrument in cancer care settings: assessing factorial validity, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00756-3.
Austin JD, Finney Rutten LJ, Fischer K, Ridgeway J, Minteer S, Griffin JM, Pachman DR, Ruddy KJ, Cheville A. Advancing Care Team Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems for Cancer Symptom Management: Findings From a Hybrid Type II, Cluster-Randomized, Stepped-Wedge Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Feb;21(2):209-217. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00280. Epub 2024 Aug 6.
Ridgeway JL, Cheville AL, Fischer KJ, Tesch NK, Austin JD, Minteer SA, Pachman DR, Chlan LL, Ruddy KJ, Griffin JM. Tracking activities and adaptations in a multi-site stepped wedge pragmatic trial of a cancer symptom management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 9;38:101269. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101269. eCollection 2024 Apr.
Kroenke K, Lam V, Ruddy KJ, Pachman DR, Herrin J, Rahman PA, Griffin JM, Cheville AL. Prevalence, Severity, and Co-Occurrence of SPPADE Symptoms in 31,866 Patients With Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.020. Epub 2023 Feb 2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2020-06973
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
E2C2
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
18-007779
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.