Enhanced, EHR-facilitated Cancer Symptom Control Pragmatic Clinical Trial

NCT ID: NCT03892967

Last Updated: 2025-10-07

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50207 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-28

Study Completion Date

2023-01-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This early phase I trial investigates enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer system control. Cancer and its treatment are often associated with severe, disabling symptoms that have been causally linked to diminished survival, increased healthcare utilization, degraded quality of life, unemployment, and non-adherence to recommended cancer treatments. Collaborative case management for control of moderate or worse sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE symptoms), and physical dysfunction among cancer survivors and patients with cancer may improve quality of life, symptom severity, and adherence to cancer treatment, and may also reduce need for acute care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES:

I. Conduct a cluster randomized pragmatic trial with a stepped wedge design to test the hypothesis that a symptom control-focused enhanced, electronic health record (EHR)-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2) intervention will significantly reduce sleep disturbance, pain, anxiety, depression, fatigue (SPADE) symptom and physical dysfunction scores, reduce unplanned hospitalizations and emergency department visits, improve adherence to cancer therapies, and improve self-reported quality of life.

II. Evaluate the hypothesis that use of a multifaceted, evidence-based implementation strategy to support adoption and use of the E2C2 system will result in improvements in implementation and clinical outcomes.

III. Conduct a mixed methods evaluation to detect, understand and reduce disparities in the adoption and implementation of the E2C2 intervention among elderly and rural-dwelling patients with cancer.

OUTLINE:

The first Primary Objective involves a stepped wedge enrollment into the study intervention. Involvement is based off the patients' responses to the pain questionnaire (low pain = no involvement, moderate pain = offer of patient education materials, severe pain = involvement of a Symptom Care Manager). Symptom Care Managers will work with interested patients who endorse high pain to help address and manage their pain. The third objective involves a subset of patients included in the E2C2 who are offered to participate in a one-time interview lasting 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also will be invited to participate in an interview lasting 15-30 minutes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hematopoietic and Lymphoid Cell Neoplasm Malignant Solid Neoplasm

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Supportive care (interview)

Patients randomized to E2C2 intervention participate in an interview over 30-45 minutes. Providers and stakeholders also participate in an interview over 15-30 minutes.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Interview

Intervention Type OTHER

Participate in interview

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Questionnaire Administration

Intervention Type OTHER

Ancillary studies

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Interview

Participate in interview

Intervention Type OTHER

Quality-of-Life Assessment

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Questionnaire Administration

Ancillary studies

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Quality of Life Assessment

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Being seen for a solid or liquid cancer at a Midwest Mayo Clinic Midwest Mayo Clinic Health Systems (MCHS) site or for a solid tumor at Mayo Clinic Rochester

Exclusion Criteria

* No Minors (under age 18) will receive the questionnaires but no further exclusions can be made based on the standard of care for questionnaire assignment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute (NCI)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Mayo Clinic

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Andrea L Cheville

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Mayo Clinic in Rochester

Rochester, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Finney Rutten LJ, Ruddy KJ, Chlan LL, Griffin JM, Herrin J, Leppin AL, Pachman DR, Ridgeway JL, Rahman PA, Storlie CB, Wilson PM, Cheville AL. Pragmatic cluster randomized trial to evaluate effectiveness and implementation of enhanced EHR-facilitated cancer symptom control (E2C2). Trials. 2020 Jun 5;21(1):480. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04335-w.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 32503661 (View on PubMed)

Minteer SA, Ridgeway JL, Pachman DR, Austin JD, Griffin JM, Ruddy KJ, Cheville AL. Barriers and facilitators to using practice facilitators to implement a remote cancer symptom management intervention: a mixed methods study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Sep 3;25(1):1189. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-13378-1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40903741 (View on PubMed)

Kuharic M, Merle JL, Cella D, Mitchell SA, DiMartino L, Ridgeway JL, Dizon DS, Paudel R, Austin JD, Wong SL, Flores AM, Cheville AL, Smith JD; IMPACT Consortium. Psychometric evaluation of the NoMAD instrument in cancer care settings: assessing factorial validity, measurement invariance, and differential item functioning. Implement Sci Commun. 2025 Jun 16;6(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s43058-025-00756-3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 40524282 (View on PubMed)

Austin JD, Finney Rutten LJ, Fischer K, Ridgeway J, Minteer S, Griffin JM, Pachman DR, Ruddy KJ, Cheville A. Advancing Care Team Adoption of Electronic Health Record Systems for Cancer Symptom Management: Findings From a Hybrid Type II, Cluster-Randomized, Stepped-Wedge Trial. JCO Oncol Pract. 2025 Feb;21(2):209-217. doi: 10.1200/OP.24.00280. Epub 2024 Aug 6.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39106420 (View on PubMed)

Ridgeway JL, Cheville AL, Fischer KJ, Tesch NK, Austin JD, Minteer SA, Pachman DR, Chlan LL, Ruddy KJ, Griffin JM. Tracking activities and adaptations in a multi-site stepped wedge pragmatic trial of a cancer symptom management intervention. Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Feb 9;38:101269. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101269. eCollection 2024 Apr.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38380342 (View on PubMed)

Kroenke K, Lam V, Ruddy KJ, Pachman DR, Herrin J, Rahman PA, Griffin JM, Cheville AL. Prevalence, Severity, and Co-Occurrence of SPPADE Symptoms in 31,866 Patients With Cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2023 May;65(5):367-377. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2023.01.020. Epub 2023 Feb 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36738867 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2020-06973

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

P30CA015083

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

UM1CA233033

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

E2C2

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

18-007779

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pain and Fatigue Study
NCT00006253 COMPLETED NA