Whole-body Vibration in Children With Neurofibromatosis Type 1
NCT ID: NCT03888248
Last Updated: 2021-03-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
30 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-07-22
2020-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
If families are keen to take part in this study, the investigators will first need to check they are suitable for the trial. This will be based on the participant's age (6-16 years), their other medical problems that would affect use of the vibration device or tests to assess how effective it is, and their level of muscle weakness.
Once families have agreed to take part, participants will be randomised either to receive a muscle-strengthening exercise session delivered by a physiotherapist that children with weak muscles should continue to perform daily for the next 6 months; or to receive a vibration device to take home and use for a few minutes 5 days a week for 6 months as well as the exercises.
All participants will be invited to attend for a variety of activities and tests, just before starting the trial and 6 months later at the end of the trial to see if there is any benefit from the vibration device. The investigators will repeat these tests again 3 months later, to see if any benefits observed remain, even after the device is removed. They will involve jumping, hopping and balancing on a board, gripping a machine as hard and as long as possible, being fitted with a device that measures activity for 7 days, walking as far as possible for 6 minutes, scanning muscles using MRI, completing a tiredness and general well-being questionnaires, and parents completing a questionnaire of the participant's attention and intellect. The jumping will also be performed 3 months into the study, to see if there is any early improvement in this key test.
All participants will be given full details of what the trial involves before taking part. As with any other trial, participants and their families are free to stop taking part at any time. Although the investigators do not anticipate any safety issues, if any do arise, the families will be asked to contact the trial team.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Whole Body Vibration Therapy in Children With Spinal Muscular Atrophy
NCT03056144
Virtual Reality and Whole Body Vibration on Muscle Strength and Balance in Children With DMD
NCT07338812
Whole Body Vibration Versus Functional Strength Training On Balance In Children With Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
NCT05936554
Whole Body Vibration for Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy
NCT05896111
Use of EMG to Assess Clinical Hypertonia
NCT00472914
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In this proposed preliminary matched-pairs interventional trial, the investigators aim to identify whether a home-based WBV therapy programme (9 minutes twice daily for 5 days per week) in addition to standard daily muscle-strengthening exercises improves muscle mass, strength and function over a six month period in children with NF1 aged 6-16 years, compared to daily muscle-strengthening exercises alone. Participants must have evidence of poor muscle strength, with grip force used to assess for this. Key exclusion criteria include significant learning difficulty or autistic spectrum disorder which would create difficulty in use of the WBV device, focal skeletal abnormalities and contraindications to WBV therapy.
The primary outcome measure will be dynamic muscle function using mechanography to measure peak power per kilogram on single two-legged jump.
Secondary/exploratory outcome measures include the 6-minute walk test (to assess lower limb muscle function and mobility), accelerometer data (as a surrogate marker of type and duration of physical activity), hand-held dynamometry (to assess upper limb grip force and endurance), measures on mechanography other than jumping power (to further assess dynamic muscle function), MRI for muscle cross-sectional area and signal intensity, fatigue and general well-being questionnaires and parental reports of attention and cognition.
These measures will be undertaken at baseline, on completion of intervention at 6 months, and again 3 months after to identify whether there is any sustained effect of the intervention following removal. Halfway through the intervention period (3 months), participants will also be invited just to complete the primary outcome of single two-legged jump on ground reaction force plate, as an interim measure.
The investigators hypothesise that WBV therapy will result in increased muscle mass and passive muscle strengthening of the lower limbs, which will translate into better muscle function in the lower limbs compared to baseline data and control group. As it is hypothesised that muscle weakness contributes to the fatigue demonstrated in children with NF1, the investigators would expect to see an improvement in their fatigue scores, which, combined with greater muscle strength, will translate into greater physical activity. The investigators hypothesise that WBV may also have an impact on muscle function in the upper limbs through central sensory stimulation and neuronal rewiring. Many children with NF1 have evidence of attention problems, and the investigators hypothesise that this may improve with WBV, again through central neuronal rewiring.
The trial will be conducted in compliance with this protocol, Good Clinical Practice (GCP) and applicable regulatory requirements.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exercises
Daily muscle-strengthening exercises
Muscle strengthening exercises
Daily muscle strengthening exercises to be performed at home following a group education session by paediatric physiotherapist
Whole-body vibration + exercises
Home-based whole-body vibration therapy plus daily muscle-strengthening exercises
Whole-body vibration
Home-based whole-body vibration therapy by standing on Galileo Med 15 platform for 9 mins twice a day for 5 days per week
Muscle strengthening exercises
Daily muscle strengthening exercises to be performed at home following a group education session by paediatric physiotherapist
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Whole-body vibration
Home-based whole-body vibration therapy by standing on Galileo Med 15 platform for 9 mins twice a day for 5 days per week
Muscle strengthening exercises
Daily muscle strengthening exercises to be performed at home following a group education session by paediatric physiotherapist
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Grip force less than -1 SDS according to age- and gender-matched normative data
Exclusion Criteria
* Significant autistic spectrum disorder or learning difficulties (neurodevelopmental age less than 6 years)
* Inability to adequately weight-bear or balance on vibrating platform
* Lower limb plexiform causing limb length discrepancy
* Contraindications to use of whole-body vibration device (acute thrombosis, implants in activated regions of the body, acute inflammation of the locomotor system, herniae, propensity to fragility fractures or fracture within the past 3 months, history of renal calculi, epilepsy)
6 Years
16 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Manchester Metropolitan University
OTHER
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Zulf Mughal
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Manchester University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
B00472
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.