Brachial Plexus Birth Palsy: Reinforcement Paradigm to Augment Recovery
NCT ID: NCT03886792
Last Updated: 2021-01-28
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
24 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-02-25
2021-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Constraint-induced Movement Therapy for Perinatal Brachial Plexus Injury
NCT03765034
NMES Efficacy on Patients With NBPP
NCT01999465
Effectiveness of Armeo Spring Pediatric in Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury
NCT03780322
Forced Lefthandedness in Neonatal Brachial Plexus Palsy (NBPP) Children
NCT04376372
The Effect of Action Observation Therapy on Upper Extremity Function in Children With Obstetric Brachial Plexus Injury
NCT06199167
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Triggered Reinforcement
This group will participate in a home-based experimental intervention for 10 minutes, twice/day for 10 days within 2 weeks. The infants will be supported in sitting with a tray secured anterior to the trunk. This intervention will involve reinforcement of biceps muscle activation in the affected arm if the infant generates a muscle contraction above a pre-set threshold (V). The threshold needed to trigger a toy to move and make sounds (reinforcement) will be set at baseline as determined by surface electromyography (SEMG). During the training time-points, the parent or care-giver will be allowed to sing or talk to the infant but are not to shake the toys or place dowel-based rattles or toys in either palm of the infant.
Triggered reinforcement
This group will participate in a home-based experimental intervention for 10 minutes, twice/day for 10 days within 2 weeks. The infants will be supported in sitting with a tray secured anterior to the trunk. This intervention will involve reinforcement of biceps muscle activation in the affected arm if the infant generates a muscle contraction above a pre-set threshold (V). The threshold needed to trigger a toy to move and make sounds (reinforcement) will be set at baseline as determined by surface electromyography (SEMG). During the training time-points, the parent or care-giver will be allowed to sing or talk to the infant but are not to shake the toys or place dowel-based rattles or toys in either palm of the infant.
Social Interaction
This group will participate in a home-based dose-equivalent control intervention for 10 minutes, twice/day for 10 days within 2 weeks. The infants will be supported in sitting with a tray. This control program will combine social interaction between infant/parent with the opportunity for self-initiated play with toys repeatedly placed on the tray. A toy will be placed in front of the infant seat and tray but it will not be connected to the SEMG unit nor will the infant have an SEMG electrode attached over the biceps. During the intervention, the parent or care-giver will be allowed to sing or talk to the infant but are not to shake the toys or place dowel-based rattles or toys in either palm of the infant.
Social interaction
This group will participate in a home-based dose-equivalent control intervention for 10 minutes, twice/day for 10 days within 2 weeks. The infants will be supported in sitting with a tray. This control program will combine social interaction between infant/parent with the opportunity for self-initiated play with toys repeatedly placed on the tray. A toy will be placed in front of the infant seat and tray but it will not be connected to the SEMG unit nor will the infant have an SEMG electrode attached over the biceps. During the intervention, the parent or care-giver will be allowed to sing or talk to the infant but are not to shake the toys or place dowel-based rattles or toys in either palm of the infant.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Triggered reinforcement
This group will participate in a home-based experimental intervention for 10 minutes, twice/day for 10 days within 2 weeks. The infants will be supported in sitting with a tray secured anterior to the trunk. This intervention will involve reinforcement of biceps muscle activation in the affected arm if the infant generates a muscle contraction above a pre-set threshold (V). The threshold needed to trigger a toy to move and make sounds (reinforcement) will be set at baseline as determined by surface electromyography (SEMG). During the training time-points, the parent or care-giver will be allowed to sing or talk to the infant but are not to shake the toys or place dowel-based rattles or toys in either palm of the infant.
Social interaction
This group will participate in a home-based dose-equivalent control intervention for 10 minutes, twice/day for 10 days within 2 weeks. The infants will be supported in sitting with a tray. This control program will combine social interaction between infant/parent with the opportunity for self-initiated play with toys repeatedly placed on the tray. A toy will be placed in front of the infant seat and tray but it will not be connected to the SEMG unit nor will the infant have an SEMG electrode attached over the biceps. During the intervention, the parent or care-giver will be allowed to sing or talk to the infant but are not to shake the toys or place dowel-based rattles or toys in either palm of the infant.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Full-term at birth;
3. A minimum score of '1' (0-7 scale) in elbow flexion of affected arm (isometric contraction) based on the Active Movement Scale (AMS);
4. Score ≥ 25th percentile on the motor subtest of the Bayley Scales of Infant and Toddler Development, 3rd Edition (BSITD-III®);
5. Ability to sustain attention/arousal for a 10 minute training period based on criteria from the Neonatal Behavioral Assessment for an awake-alert state.
Exclusion Criteria
2. Nerve repair/shoulder surgery;
3. Excessive crying during session(s);
4. Shoulder, elbow, or wrist joint contractures \> 20° in the affected arm;
5. An inability to trigger the musical-toy to play at baseline.
3 Months
12 Months
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
American Society for Surgery of the Hand
OTHER
Chapman University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Susan V Duff, EdD,PTOT,CHT
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Chapman University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Children's Hospital of Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Duff SV, Sargent B, Kutch JJ, Berggren J, Leiby BE, Fetters L. Using Contingent Reinforcement to Augment Muscle Activation After Perinatal Brachial Plexus Injury: A Pilot Study. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017 Oct 20;37(5):555-565. doi: 10.1080/01942638.2017.1290733. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
Eldridge SM, Chan CL, Campbell MJ, Bond CM, Hopewell S, Thabane L, Lancaster GA; PAFS consensus group. CONSORT 2010 statement: extension to randomised pilot and feasibility trials. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2016 Oct 21;2:64. doi: 10.1186/s40814-016-0105-8. eCollection 2016.
Foad SL, Mehlman CT, Ying J. The epidemiology of neonatal brachial plexus palsy in the United States. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Jun;90(6):1258-64. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.00853.
Sullivan GM, Artino AR Jr. Analyzing and interpreting data from likert-type scales. J Grad Med Educ. 2013 Dec;5(4):541-2. doi: 10.4300/JGME-5-4-18. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1408
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.