The Efficacy of Decision Support E-book for Prostate Biopsy Decision Making

NCT ID: NCT03881709

Last Updated: 2019-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-04

Study Completion Date

2019-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

PURPOSE: This study is to test the efficacy of decision support E-Book for 1) increasing prostate biopsy knowledge and decision self-efficacy, and 2) reducing decisional conflict on prostate biopsy decision making in patients with elevated serum PSA.

DESIGN: The study is based on an experimental design. A convent sample of 110 adult males with a PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL and the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy suggested by a physician will be recruited from the urology clinics. Patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy. The control group will receive a health education about prostate biopsy. Data on biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy and decision conflict will be collected at pre and post test by using the study questionnaires.

ANALYSIS: Independent sample t -tests and chi-square tests will be used to compare the between group baseline equilibrium. Independent sample t -tests will be also used to analyze the between group differences in biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and decision conflict at post-test to evaluate the efficacy of the decision support intervention.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is the primary screening test for prostate cancer. The elevated PSA test result is usually followed by the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS-Bx) for further diagnosis. However, patients often have lots concerns while deciding whether or not to undergo a prostate biopsy. They may worry about the biopsy associated complications such as urinary tract infection, pain, hematuria, bloody stools, etc., causing damage to urinary tract or sexual function, diagnosed with prostate cancer, or cancer spreading. Some may even worry about that a cancer cell can be transmitted to a partner through sexual activity after a biopsy. All these can cause physiological stress and decisional conflict for the patients. Therefore, it is necessary to provide decision support measures in order to improve the patients' knowledge regarding the advantages and disadvantages of prostate biopsy, to increase their decision self-efficacy, and to decrease their decisional conflict, thereby to achieve the share decision making goal. However, few studies have examined the efficacy of decision aids on prostate biopsy decision making. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test the efficacy of decision support E-Book for 1) increasing prostate biopsy knowledge and decision self-efficacy, and 2) reducing decisional conflict on prostate biopsy decision making in patients with elevated serum PSA.

The study is based on an experimental design. A convent sample of 110 adult males with a PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL and the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy suggested by a physician will be recruited from the urology clinics. Patients will be randomly assigned to the intervention and control group. The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy. The control group will receive a health education about prostate biopsy. Data on biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy and decision conflict will be collected at pre and post test by using the study questionnaires. The study instruments include the prostate biopsy knowledge scale, the Decision Self-Efficacy Scale, and the Decisional Conflict Scale. Data on whether the patients received a prostate biopsy will also be collected from the patients' medical records.

Independent sample t -tests and chi-square tests will be used to compare the between group baseline equilibrium. Independent sample t -tests will be also used to analyze the between group differences in biopsy knowledge, decision self-efficacy, and decision conflict at post-test to evaluate the efficacy of the decision support intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate-Specific Antigen

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Caregivers

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

The intervention group

The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Using an E-Book

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy.

The control group

The control group will receive a health education about prostate biopsy.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Using an E-Book

The intervention group will receive the biopsy decision support intervention delivered by a nurse using an E-Book containing a comprehensive information about prostate biopsy.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. aged between 40-80
2. PSA greater than 4.0 ng/mL
3. the transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy suggested by a physician
4. able to communicate in Mandarin or Taiwanese.

Exclusion Criteria

1. had been diagnosed with prostate cancer
2. had been diagnosed with psychiatric diseases
3. with cognition impairments
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cheng-Hsin General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Tsae Jyy, Wang

RN PhD Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Tsae Jyy Wang, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Taipei University of Nursing and Health Sciences

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cheng Hsin General Hospital

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Taiwan

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Chen NH, Lin YP, Liang SY, Tung HH, Tsay SL, Wang TJ. Conflict when making decisions about dialysis modality. J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e138-e146. doi: 10.1111/jocn.13890. Epub 2017 Jul 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28543737 (View on PubMed)

Luque JS, Ross L, Gwede CK. Prostate Cancer Education in African American Barbershops: Baseline Client Survey Results and Differences in Decisional Conflict and Stage of Decision Making. Am J Mens Health. 2016 Nov;10(6):533-536. doi: 10.1177/1557988316630952. Epub 2016 Feb 9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26860126 (View on PubMed)

Catalona WJ, Richie JP, Ahmann FR, Hudson MA, Scardino PT, Flanigan RC, DeKernion JB, Ratliff TL, Kavoussi LR, Dalkin BL, Waters WB, MacFarlane MT, Southwick PC. Comparison of Digital Rectal Examination and Serum Prostate Specific Antigen in the Early Detection of Prostate Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Clinical Trial of 6,630 Men. J Urol. 2017 Feb;197(2S):S200-S207. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2016.10.073. Epub 2016 Dec 22.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28012755 (View on PubMed)

Groarke A, Curtis R, Walsh DMJ, Sullivan FJ. What predicts emotional response in men awaiting prostate biopsy? BMC Urol. 2018 Apr 24;18(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12894-018-0340-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29699543 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

(667)107A-39

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.