Using Decision Analysis to Enhance Decision-Making Regarding Prostate Cancer Screening

NCT ID: NCT03387527

Last Updated: 2019-10-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

50 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-01

Study Completion Date

2018-11-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate a new counseling tool for patients deciding whether or not to undergo prostate cancer screening. This screening decision aid is a computer program that provides individual patients estimates of their risks of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer related death, or death from any cause. The researchers are evaluating whether or not patients find this screening decision aid helpful. As part of this study, participants will be asked for their response on questionnaires.

If patients find the screening decision aid helpful, the researchers will make it available at other clinic locations.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

To conduct a feasibility study on implementing the computer-based screening decision aid for prostate cancer screening in a primary care setting during a 60-minute interview. To aid in informed decision making, the screening decision aid will include a graphical representation of predicted probabilities of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer-specific mortality, death from competing causes based on a man's unique demographic information. The study team will provide standardized counseling followed by individualized counseling with the screening decision aid. It will assess the quality of the decision making process (patient feels knowledgeable, informed of the risks/benefits, feels clear about their values, is involved in the decision), and quality of the decision.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Prostate Cancer Decision Aid

The research intervention will be exposure to the screening decision aid. Patients will receive standardized counseling including population based risks and benefits of prostate cancer screening. Then, patients will be given opportunity to review the screening decision aid prior to offering a decision on whether or not to undergo prostate cancer screening. The patient decision aid will be a computer application that generates predicted risks associated with prostate cancer.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Prostate cancer decision aid

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Patients will undergo standardized counseling and individualized counseling with the screening decision aid. The screening decision aid is a computer program that provides individual patients estimates of their risks of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer related death, or death from any cause

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Prostate cancer decision aid

Patients will undergo standardized counseling and individualized counseling with the screening decision aid. The screening decision aid is a computer program that provides individual patients estimates of their risks of prostate cancer diagnosis, prostate cancer related death, or death from any cause

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

screening decision aid

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Life expectancy \> 10 years
* Ability to read English

Exclusion Criteria

* Personal history of prostate cancer
* Personal history of prostate biopsy or prostate surgery
* Prior prostate specific antigen screening in the past year leading up to their scheduled clinic visit
* Cognitive impairment
Minimum Eligible Age

55 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

69 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael A Brooks, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Cleveland Clinic Taussig Cancer Institute, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CASE7817

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.