Decision Support Tools for Men With Prostate Cancer- Clinical & Lifestyle Model
NCT ID: NCT02451345
Last Updated: 2020-07-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
58 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2015-03-25
2020-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This study involves: completion of questionnaires through the secure website; consultation by a health coach to aid men with prostate cancer in making informed treatment decision (personalized coaching session(s)).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Decision Making in Men With Early Stage Prostate Cancer Patients and Partners/Close Allies
NCT01877070
Older Men's Decision Making About Active Surveillance for Prostate Cancer - Aim 3: Decision Aid Cognitive and Usability Testing
NCT05497024
Treatment Decision Making in Early-Stage Prostate Cancer
NCT00196781
Decision Making in Unaffected First-Degree Relatives of Prostate Cancer Patients
NCT00815750
Optimizing Active Surveillance in Low-Risk Prostate Cancer: a Pilot Study
NCT05764005
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The web and coaching intervention will: 1) summarize key prognostic data elements, 2) communicate relative and absolute risks of upgrading/upstaging based on each of these elements, individually and in aggregate, and 3) provide tailored educational information for informed decision making on treatment options. A key aspect of the intervention will be provision of tiered coaching to the men prior to their physician visits to help them enter information accurately into the system, understand the results of the prediction model, document their questions for their physicians, and prepare them to make better-informed treatment decisions. UCSF research team will develop the decision support intervention in phases, initially using only clinical variables, BMI (body mass index), and smoking data;and then extend it to include information from genomic and genetic inputs, as validation work progresses. Variables will be retained based on statistical evaluation of the predictive values.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intervention
Personalized risk model+website+phone coaching
Personalized risk model+website+coaching intervention
A health coach (members of the Patient Support Corps at the University of California San Francisco) will contact each subject individually to discuss his tailored/personalized web-portal report on his risk of aggressive disease and the pro/cons of treatment versus active surveillance.
The contact between subject and the health coaches will be done before subject's visit with his primary urologist. Subjects will be asked to complete different questionnaires on four different occasions: one at first visit to the interactive secure web portal; one before coach's call; one after the coaching (after the urologist visit), and one at 6 months. The questionnaire after subject's visit with the urologist includes discussion about their management choice, decision quality, anxiety and satisfaction with care.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Personalized risk model+website+coaching intervention
A health coach (members of the Patient Support Corps at the University of California San Francisco) will contact each subject individually to discuss his tailored/personalized web-portal report on his risk of aggressive disease and the pro/cons of treatment versus active surveillance.
The contact between subject and the health coaches will be done before subject's visit with his primary urologist. Subjects will be asked to complete different questionnaires on four different occasions: one at first visit to the interactive secure web portal; one before coach's call; one after the coaching (after the urologist visit), and one at 6 months. The questionnaire after subject's visit with the urologist includes discussion about their management choice, decision quality, anxiety and satisfaction with care.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Biopsy Gleason score \< 3+3,
3. Has localized (clinical stage \< T2N0M0) prostate cancer with a PSA \<10ng/ml
4. Consent to research follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
2. men unable to consent, prisoners, those with ECOG performance status \>2, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements, or inability to read English or Spanish.
18 Years
MALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Peter Carroll, MD, MPH
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center
San Francisco, California, United States
University of California, San Francisco (SFGH)
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2018-02056
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
14557
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.