Decision Support Tools for Men With Prostate Cancer- Clinical & Lifestyle Model

NCT ID: NCT02451345

Last Updated: 2020-07-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

58 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2015-03-25

Study Completion Date

2020-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

A UCSF PI-initiated study with a primary goal to improve decision quality, anxiety, and uncertainty, thereby increasing appropriate uptake of active surveillance and reducing over-treatment of low-risk prostate cancer.

This study involves: completion of questionnaires through the secure website; consultation by a health coach to aid men with prostate cancer in making informed treatment decision (personalized coaching session(s)).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A UCSF PI-initiated study which includes comprehensive decision support intervention that may incorporate clinical, lifestyle, tumor genomic, and germline gene variant data.

The web and coaching intervention will: 1) summarize key prognostic data elements, 2) communicate relative and absolute risks of upgrading/upstaging based on each of these elements, individually and in aggregate, and 3) provide tailored educational information for informed decision making on treatment options. A key aspect of the intervention will be provision of tiered coaching to the men prior to their physician visits to help them enter information accurately into the system, understand the results of the prediction model, document their questions for their physicians, and prepare them to make better-informed treatment decisions. UCSF research team will develop the decision support intervention in phases, initially using only clinical variables, BMI (body mass index), and smoking data;and then extend it to include information from genomic and genetic inputs, as validation work progresses. Variables will be retained based on statistical evaluation of the predictive values.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostate Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

OTHER

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Intervention

Personalized risk model+website+phone coaching

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Personalized risk model+website+coaching intervention

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

A health coach (members of the Patient Support Corps at the University of California San Francisco) will contact each subject individually to discuss his tailored/personalized web-portal report on his risk of aggressive disease and the pro/cons of treatment versus active surveillance.

The contact between subject and the health coaches will be done before subject's visit with his primary urologist. Subjects will be asked to complete different questionnaires on four different occasions: one at first visit to the interactive secure web portal; one before coach's call; one after the coaching (after the urologist visit), and one at 6 months. The questionnaire after subject's visit with the urologist includes discussion about their management choice, decision quality, anxiety and satisfaction with care.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Personalized risk model+website+coaching intervention

A health coach (members of the Patient Support Corps at the University of California San Francisco) will contact each subject individually to discuss his tailored/personalized web-portal report on his risk of aggressive disease and the pro/cons of treatment versus active surveillance.

The contact between subject and the health coaches will be done before subject's visit with his primary urologist. Subjects will be asked to complete different questionnaires on four different occasions: one at first visit to the interactive secure web portal; one before coach's call; one after the coaching (after the urologist visit), and one at 6 months. The questionnaire after subject's visit with the urologist includes discussion about their management choice, decision quality, anxiety and satisfaction with care.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Men \>18 years of age with newly diagnosed (within 3 month) low risk prostatecancer , who have not yet received cancer-directed therapy, Or Men who are at risk of prostate cancer and coming to have a diagnostic biopsy, and diagnosed with low grade of prostate cancer
2. Biopsy Gleason score \< 3+3,
3. Has localized (clinical stage \< T2N0M0) prostate cancer with a PSA \<10ng/ml
4. Consent to research follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

1. men with missing data on PSA, stage, Gleason, or extent of biopsy core involvement; no baseline (diagnostic) biopsy or germline DNA sample for research; or no follow-up pathology (from biopsy or RP) after diagnosis.
2. men unable to consent, prisoners, those with ECOG performance status \>2, or psychiatric illness/social situations that would limit compliance with study requirements, or inability to read English or Spanish.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of California, San Francisco

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Peter Carroll, MD, MPH

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of California, San Francisco

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

University of California, San Francisco (SFGH)

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCI-2018-02056

Identifier Type: REGISTRY

Identifier Source: secondary_id

14557

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.