A Study of Different Endoscopic Surgery Procedures in Eosinophilic Chronic Rhinosinusitis With Nasal Polyps

NCT ID: NCT03878355

Last Updated: 2019-03-18

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

27 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2010-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

CRS remains a common challenging clinical entity due to variable phenotypes with different underlying mechanisms that lead to persistence or recurrence polyps. The eosinophils dominant inflammation was considered as a major pathological hallmark and challenges of CRS with nasal polyps (CRSwNP). Differentiate surgical approaches towards eosinophilic CRSwNP (eCRSwNP) should be addressed on the basis of the inflammatory endotypes. eCRSwNP has been recognized as the most easily relapsed type of CRS, and the combination of asthma increases the difficulty of treatment. Till now there is no recognized surgical strategy for eCRSwNP with asthma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis) Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Patients were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive FESS, RESS and RESS plus Draf 3 surgery.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

radical endoscopic sinus surgery plus Draf 3 surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

radical endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS) plus Draf 3 surgery.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected. The technique for the Draf 3 frontal drillout procedure was described in detail in previous publications with resection of the superior nasal septum, central frontal sinus floor, and frontal beak region, resulting in a widely patent, oval-shaped, common frontal sinus neo-ostium

radical endoscopic sinus surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

radical endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected

functional endoscopic sinus surgery

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

FESS was performed by Messerklinger technique with middle turbinate preservation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

radical endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS) plus Draf 3 surgery.

The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected. The technique for the Draf 3 frontal drillout procedure was described in detail in previous publications with resection of the superior nasal septum, central frontal sinus floor, and frontal beak region, resulting in a widely patent, oval-shaped, common frontal sinus neo-ostium

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

radical endoscopic sinus surgery (RESS)

The procedure of RESS was completed as described in "full-house FESS (FHF)" approach, involving complete removal of all nasal polyps along with a full maxillary antrostomy, total ethmoidectomy, wide sphenoidotomy, and a Draf 2A frontal sinusotomy. Moreover the bilateral inferior two-thirds of MTs were meanwhile resected

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

functional endoscopic sinus surgery (FESS)

FESS was performed by Messerklinger technique with middle turbinate preservation

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* The diagnosis of CRSwNP was based on the standard criteria issued in the European Position Paper on Rhinosinusitis and Nasal Polyps guidelines.
* Participants had at least 1 previous sinus surgery underwent FESS (middle turbinate (MT) preserved), good gasification of frontal sinus and with concomitant asthma.
* The diagnosis of asthma was confirmed by a chest physician according to Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) guidelines.
* Polyp biopsy was undertaken 1 week before surgery and the eCRSwNP was confirmed by the number of eosinophils exceeded 10% of total infiltrating inflammatory cells in the polyp tissue through the evaluation by using hematoxylin and eosin (H\&E) staining.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients were excluded if they had unilateral disease, allergic fungal rhinosinusitis, antrochoanal polyps, or cysts.
Minimum Eligible Age

24 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

71 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Beijing Tongren Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

TR-ES

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.