Outcome of Proximal Femur Replacement at a Tertiary Care Hospital

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

70 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2009-01-01

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a retrospective review of all patients who underwent PFR for either bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement

Related Clinical Trials

Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.

Comparison of Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty and Total Hip Arthroplasty With Dual Mobility Cup

NCT03875014

Dislocations

COMPLETED

Frailty in Hip or Knee Arthroplasty Patients.

NCT07086716

Frail Elderly Arthroplasties Hip Replacement Arthroplasty Knee

RECRUITING

Short Term and Long Term Outcome for Elderly Patients Treated With Total Hip Replacement

NCT03120312

Total Hip Replacement

RECRUITING

Unipolar or Bipolar Hemiarthroplasty in the Treatment of Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures.

NCT00746876

Hip Fractures

COMPLETED NA

Full Versus Partial Repairing of Soft Tissue Surrounding the Hip in Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fractures

NCT02897440

Femoral Neck Fracture

UNKNOWN

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

retrospective review of all patients who underwent PFR for either bipolar hemiarthroplasty or total hip replacement will be conducted All patients that fall in the selection criteria from 2009 to 2018 will be included as part of this study will be selected Patients are identified using medical record numbers. A questionnaire containing questions on demographics of the patients which includes their age, sex and co morbids. Furthermore, the cause of fracture, time from the fracture to presentation in the emergency room, time from the presentation to ER to the time patient was in the operating room would be noted. Duration of the surgery.

The weight bearing status in the ward and follow-up would be noted. Functionality of the patient; which is that how much patients are able to carry their normal daily routine work would also be noted from the medical records.

Collected data will be analysed using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS, Inc, Chicago, IL, USA). Results will be recorded as frequencies, means, Standard Deviation (SD) and p-values while statistical tests will be applied for comparative reasons. For all purposes a p-value of 0.05 will be considered as the level of significance.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Outcome, Fatal

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_ONLY

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

proximal femur replacement

patient with proximal femur fracture or those in whom previous surgery on hip is failed and treated with replacement of proximal femur implant

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* All patients, regardless of race, gender, age and co-morbids, who were treated with proximal femur fracture with any of the following variables:

Poor bone quality Bone loss Severe communition Multiple comorbids Failed hip surgery Pathological fractures