Total Hip Replacement Performance & Assessment

NCT ID: NCT04267172

Last Updated: 2025-01-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

243 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-26

Study Completion Date

2022-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This research study is focused upon assessing and optimising surgeon's performance during, and patient outcomes following, primary total hip replacement (THR) surgery. The primary research question is to determine if additional simulation training can improve the intra-operative performance of surgical trainees (Residents) during a THR, or the outcome of patients after their THR. The investigators will aim to define an 'expert' standard in performing a primary elective THR, which may be used as a benchmark when assessing surgical trainee performance; and also determine if operative surgeon performance metrics during a THR are correlated with surgical experience, or patient outcomes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The surgeon participants in this study will be divided into 2 groups depending upon their position and seniority. The 'Expert' group will be composed of Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons and Senior Fellows, and the 'Trainee' group will be composed of Trauma \& Orthopaedic Specialty Registrars (Residents) on clinical placements in Adult Arthroplasty.

The intervention to be tested is the simulation-based training and cognitive learning package. This will be delivered for 1-2 hours per week over a 4-week period in a supervised non-clinical setting to a randomised sub-group of 50% of the Surgical Trainees enrolled into this study. Surgeon participants within the Expert/Fellow comparator group will not undergo any interventions.

The outcome measures will be surgeon-specific and patient-specific. These outcome measures for the 'Trainee' group will commence following completion of the simulation training (if applicable), whereas they can commence immediately following study approval for the 'Expert' group. The surgeon-specific outcome measures will be the objective motion-analysis metrics generated by validated and extensively used wireless sensors placed on the elbows of surgeons under their sterile gowns during the operation; and subjective assessments of surgical trainee performance using validated and reliable forms of structured human grading. Patient-specific outcome measures will be collected for a pre-determined number of patients who have undergone a primary elective THR by any of the surgeon participants in this study. All patient participants will be asked to provide their written informed consent for the use of their data in this study. The patient-specific outcome measures include: pre- and post-operative blood tests and radiograph (X-ray) analysis; the incidence of blood transfusions and any other peri-operative complications; the in-patient length of stay; and two patient-reported outcome measure (PROMs) questionnaires, namely the Oxford Hip Score (OHS) and EQ-5D.

Statistical analysis will be performed on the data collected, specifically aiming to identify any significant differences in either surgeon performance metrics, or patient outcome measures between:

1. The Surgical Trainees who have undertaken additional simulation training versus those who have routine training.
2. The 'Trainee' group and the 'Expert' group. A sub-group analysis may be performed within the 'Expert' group also to determine any differences between the Consultants and Fellows.

In summary, this novel research will use validated methodology and routinely collected patient outcome measures in order to determine the impact of simulation training on surgical trainee performance and patient outcomes following a primary elective THR, and also help to benchmark an expert level of performance in this commonly performed and highly effective operation. The results of this study will hopefully help in shaping the future of orthopaedic surgical training and assessment.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Hip Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

The intervention to be tested is the simulation-based training and cognitive learning package. This will be delivered for 1-2 hours per week over a 4-week period in a supervised non-clinical setting to a randomised sub-group of 50% of the Surgical Residents enrolled into this study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Consultant assessors will be blinded to the grouping of the Surgical Residents (additional simulation training group, or control group).

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Surgical Residents with additional simulation training

Surgeon participant Group 1a: Interventional group ('StR's'): Trauma \& Orthopaedic Specialty Registrars (Surgical Residents) on Arthroplasty clinical placements (n=6-8) receiving additional simulation training.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Surgical simulation training in primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

The simulation-based and cognitive learning package will be delivered to a randomised sub-group of 50% of the Surgical Residents recruited into this study. This will be delivered in a supervised non-clinical setting within a dedicated University-owned simulation laboratory over a 4-week period for between 1 to 2 hours per week, over 3 to 4 consecutive but separate six-month placements.

Surgical Residents with routine training

Surgeon participant Group 1b: control group (StR's): Trauma \& Orthopaedic Specialty Registrars (Surgical Residents) on Arthroplasty clinical placements (n=6-8) receiving routine and normal training.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No intervention: Surgical Resident Control Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Control Group

Orthopaedic Surgeon 'Experts & Fellows'

Consultant Orthopaedic Surgeons (n=5), and nationally appointed Arthroplasty Fellows (n=8). Surgeon participants within this group will not undergo any interventions.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No Intervention: Consultant and Fellow Comparator Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Comparator Group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Surgical simulation training in primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

The simulation-based and cognitive learning package will be delivered to a randomised sub-group of 50% of the Surgical Residents recruited into this study. This will be delivered in a supervised non-clinical setting within a dedicated University-owned simulation laboratory over a 4-week period for between 1 to 2 hours per week, over 3 to 4 consecutive but separate six-month placements.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

No intervention: Surgical Resident Control Group

Control Group

Intervention Type OTHER

No Intervention: Consultant and Fellow Comparator Group

Comparator Group

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Adult patients diagnosed with primary hip osteoarthritis who have been listed for elective primary Total Hip Replacement within the United Kingdoms National Health Service.
* Total Hip Replacement performed by a surgeon participant as lead surgeon.

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients with complex hip pathology (e.g. previous trauma, hip dysplasia, infection).
* Patients who have had previous surgery on their affected hip.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Buckinghamshire Healthcare NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Botnar Research Centre

Oxford, Oxfordshire, United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United Kingdom

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Patient Consent

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Surgeon Consent: Residents

View Document

Document Type: Informed Consent Form: Surgeon Consent: Fellows and Consultants

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

270167

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Selecting the Right Hip Prosthesis for Young Patients
NCT03279276 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA
On-Table Versus Off-Table Total Hip Arthroplasty
NCT04831372 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING NA