Cocogen Trial: COoled Versus COnventional Radiofrequency Treatment of the GENicular Nerves for Chronic Knee Pain

NCT ID: NCT03865849

Last Updated: 2023-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

49 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2020-02-02

Study Completion Date

2021-10-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Knee osteoarthritis is a progressive degenerative process that affects joint cartilage and the subchondral bone. Approximately 10% to 30% of all osteoarthritis patients suffer from disabling symptoms such as pain, stiffness and loss of function leading to psychological and sleeping disorders and a diminished quality of life. When conservative treatment fails to treat the symptoms, a total knee arthroplasty can be performed. However, this procedure is not suitable for all patients. For these specific groups of patients a radiofrequent treatment of the genicular nerves might be an alternative treatment option. Multiple researchers investigated the effect of conventional and later also, cooled radiofrequent treatment of the genicular nerves, with promising results for both techniques. However, the techniques have never been compared in a randomised controlled trial. This study is designed to assess the feasibility of conducting a large RCT comparing pain relief and costs after a conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves (superomedial, superolateral and inferomedial) versus a cooled radiofrequency treatment.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This pilot study is designed as a prospective, multicentre, double blind, randomised controlled non-inferiority trial. The total follow up time is 6 months with follow up assessments at 1, 3 and 6 months post intervention. It is estimated that the total duration of data collection will cover 1 year. Adult patients (\> 18 years) with chronic, moderate to severe knee pain (NRS\>4) due to osteoarthritis, radiological diagnosed to be graded 2-4 according to the Kellgren-Lawrence criteria or with persistent postoperative moderate to severe knee pain (NRS\>4) after total knee arthroplasty can be included in the study.

Patients will be randomly selected for treatment with conventional radiofrequent treatment or cooled radiofrequent treatment of the SL, SM and IL genicular nerves. In total, three hospitals participate in this study: Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (Belgium), Maastricht UMC+ (Netherlands) and Rijnstate (Netherlands).

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Knee Osteoarthritis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, multicentre, double blind, randomised controlled, non-inferiority, pilot study.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Conventional radiofrequent treatment

The patient is placed in a supine position on a fluoroscopy table with the index knee flexed 10-15°. The procedure is performed with a 100 mm long, 18 G straight RF cannula/introducer (Halyard) with a probe/electrode with a 10 mm active tip

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Conventional radiofrequent treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

In the conventional radiofrequency group a treatment of 80°C at the tip is applied during 90 seconds at each nerve.

Cooled radiofrequent treatment

The procedure is performed with a 100 mm long, 18 G straight RF cannula/introducer (Halyard) with a probe/electrode with a 100 mm long, 17 G RF cannula/introducer with an 18 G cooled probe/electrode with a 4 mm active tip (Halyard/Coolief).

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Cooled radiofrequent treatment

Intervention Type DEVICE

In the cooled radiofrequency group a treatment of 60°C measured at the tip and on average 80°C in the targeted tissue is applied during 150 seconds using the Coolief system.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Cooled radiofrequent treatment

In the cooled radiofrequency group a treatment of 60°C measured at the tip and on average 80°C in the targeted tissue is applied during 150 seconds using the Coolief system.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Conventional radiofrequent treatment

In the conventional radiofrequency group a treatment of 80°C at the tip is applied during 90 seconds at each nerve.

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

COOLIEF™ system

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 18 years
* Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures.
* Chronic anterior knee pain (\> 12 months) with an NRS \> 4 on most or all days for the index knee either constantly or with motion.
* Unresponsive to conventional treatments continued during 12 months including physiotherapy, oral analgesics or intra-articular infiltrations.
* Radiologic confirmation of arthritis of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee according the Kellgren Lawrence criteria (27) diagnosed by an independent radiologist with experience in musculoskeletal imaging or patients with total knee arthroplasty of the index knee with a negative orthopaedic workout.
* Other therapies (including surgical interventions) for pain in the index knee are allowed for the period of the study follow up as long as they are documented. This is necessary to correctly estimate the costs in the cost effectiveness analyses. Allowing patients to receive additional treatments will also improve the protocol compliance.
* Agree to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient refusal to comply to protocol procedures or schedule
* Local or systemic infection (bacteraemia)
* Evidence of inflammatory arthritis or an inflammatory systemic disease responsible for knee pain
* Intra-articular injections (steroids, hyaluronic acid, platelet enriched plasma, …) in the index knee during the 3 months prior to procedure
* Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
* Pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant Chronic widespread pain before the treatment
* Patients with psychosocial dysfunction will be referred for further psychological follow up prior to possible inclusion
* Allergies to products used during the procedure
* Uncontrolled coagulopathy defined as supratherapeutic dose of anticoagulation medication.
* Uncontrolled immune suppression
* Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent
* Patient is currently implanted with a defibrillator, neuromodulator or other electrical devices
* Radicular pain in index leg
* Patient received previous conventional or cooled radiofrequency of the index knee
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rijnstate Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Maastricht University Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jan Van Zundert

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jan Van Zundert, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Maastricht University Medical Centre

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Pain Medicine Rijnstate

Arnhem, , Netherlands

Site Status

Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre

Maastricht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Netherlands

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Belba A, Vanneste T, Kallewaard JW, van Kuijk SM, Gelissen M, Emans P, Bellemans J, Smeets K, Van Boxem K, Sommer M, Kimman M, Van Zundert J. Cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: 12-month and cost-effectiveness results from the multicenter COCOGEN trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 7;50(1):36-45. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105127.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 38388017 (View on PubMed)

Vanneste T, Belba A, Kallewaard JW, van Kuijk SMJ, Gelissen M, Emans P, Bellemans J, Smeets K, Terwiel C, Van Boxem K, Sommer M, Van Zundert J. Comparison of cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized pilot trial (COCOGEN trial). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 May;48(5):197-204. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104054. Epub 2023 Jan 18.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36653065 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

COCOGEN

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.