Cocogen Trial: COoled Versus COnventional Radiofrequency Treatment of the GENicular Nerves for Chronic Knee Pain
NCT ID: NCT03865849
Last Updated: 2023-04-13
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
49 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2020-02-02
2021-10-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cooled Radiofrequency vs. Hyaluronic Acid to Manage Knee Pain
NCT03381248
Nerve Ablation by Cooled Radiofrequency Compared to Corticosteroid Injection for Management of Knee Pain
NCT02343003
Intra-articular Pulsed Radiofrequency Neuromodulation Versus Intra-articular Steroids for Painful Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT04238598
Knee OsteoArthritis Long-term Assessment
NCT06839222
The Efficacy of Diclofenac Gel for Breakthrough Pain and the Neuropathic Components of Pain in Knee Osteoarthritis
NCT01383954
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Patients will be randomly selected for treatment with conventional radiofrequent treatment or cooled radiofrequent treatment of the SL, SM and IL genicular nerves. In total, three hospitals participate in this study: Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg (Belgium), Maastricht UMC+ (Netherlands) and Rijnstate (Netherlands).
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Conventional radiofrequent treatment
The patient is placed in a supine position on a fluoroscopy table with the index knee flexed 10-15°. The procedure is performed with a 100 mm long, 18 G straight RF cannula/introducer (Halyard) with a probe/electrode with a 10 mm active tip
Conventional radiofrequent treatment
In the conventional radiofrequency group a treatment of 80°C at the tip is applied during 90 seconds at each nerve.
Cooled radiofrequent treatment
The procedure is performed with a 100 mm long, 18 G straight RF cannula/introducer (Halyard) with a probe/electrode with a 100 mm long, 17 G RF cannula/introducer with an 18 G cooled probe/electrode with a 4 mm active tip (Halyard/Coolief).
Cooled radiofrequent treatment
In the cooled radiofrequency group a treatment of 60°C measured at the tip and on average 80°C in the targeted tissue is applied during 150 seconds using the Coolief system.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Cooled radiofrequent treatment
In the cooled radiofrequency group a treatment of 60°C measured at the tip and on average 80°C in the targeted tissue is applied during 150 seconds using the Coolief system.
Conventional radiofrequent treatment
In the conventional radiofrequency group a treatment of 80°C at the tip is applied during 90 seconds at each nerve.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Able to understand the informed consent form and provide written informed consent and able to complete outcome measures.
* Chronic anterior knee pain (\> 12 months) with an NRS \> 4 on most or all days for the index knee either constantly or with motion.
* Unresponsive to conventional treatments continued during 12 months including physiotherapy, oral analgesics or intra-articular infiltrations.
* Radiologic confirmation of arthritis of OA grade of 2 (mild), 3 (moderate) or 4 (severe) noted within 6 months for the index knee according the Kellgren Lawrence criteria (27) diagnosed by an independent radiologist with experience in musculoskeletal imaging or patients with total knee arthroplasty of the index knee with a negative orthopaedic workout.
* Other therapies (including surgical interventions) for pain in the index knee are allowed for the period of the study follow up as long as they are documented. This is necessary to correctly estimate the costs in the cost effectiveness analyses. Allowing patients to receive additional treatments will also improve the protocol compliance.
* Agree to provide informed consent and to comply with the requirements of this protocol for the full duration of the study
Exclusion Criteria
* Local or systemic infection (bacteraemia)
* Evidence of inflammatory arthritis or an inflammatory systemic disease responsible for knee pain
* Intra-articular injections (steroids, hyaluronic acid, platelet enriched plasma, …) in the index knee during the 3 months prior to procedure
* Body mass index (BMI) \> 40 kg/m2
* Pregnant, nursing or planning to become pregnant Chronic widespread pain before the treatment
* Patients with psychosocial dysfunction will be referred for further psychological follow up prior to possible inclusion
* Allergies to products used during the procedure
* Uncontrolled coagulopathy defined as supratherapeutic dose of anticoagulation medication.
* Uncontrolled immune suppression
* Participating in another clinical trial/investigation within 30 days prior to signing informed consent
* Patient is currently implanted with a defibrillator, neuromodulator or other electrical devices
* Radicular pain in index leg
* Patient received previous conventional or cooled radiofrequency of the index knee
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rijnstate Hospital
OTHER
Maastricht University Medical Center
OTHER
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jan Van Zundert
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jan Van Zundert, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Maastricht University Medical Centre
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ziekenhuis Oost-Limburg
Genk, , Belgium
Pain Medicine Rijnstate
Arnhem, , Netherlands
Pain Medicine, Maastricht University Medical Centre
Maastricht, , Netherlands
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Belba A, Vanneste T, Kallewaard JW, van Kuijk SM, Gelissen M, Emans P, Bellemans J, Smeets K, Van Boxem K, Sommer M, Kimman M, Van Zundert J. Cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: 12-month and cost-effectiveness results from the multicenter COCOGEN trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2025 Jan 7;50(1):36-45. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2023-105127.
Vanneste T, Belba A, Kallewaard JW, van Kuijk SMJ, Gelissen M, Emans P, Bellemans J, Smeets K, Terwiel C, Van Boxem K, Sommer M, Van Zundert J. Comparison of cooled versus conventional radiofrequency treatment of the genicular nerves for chronic knee pain: a multicenter non-inferiority randomized pilot trial (COCOGEN trial). Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2023 May;48(5):197-204. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2022-104054. Epub 2023 Jan 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
COCOGEN
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.