Understanding Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: a National Study
NCT ID: NCT03850847
Last Updated: 2024-04-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING
292 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-01
2025-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
In the ICU, at the end of life, SDMs are under incredible emotional distress, have often not eaten or slept properly for days preceding discussions about end of life and organ donation, and are also in the midst of grieving for their loved one. The time pressure poses challenges for SDMs' decision making. Thus, this study will investigate novel, potentially modifiable reasons for end of life decision so that we may better support this personally challenging and important decision, especially if organ donation decision interferes with the decision process.
Primary objective: To investigate beliefs and experiences of SDMs involved in the decision-making process around withdrawal of life sustaining therapies .
Secondary objective: To inform efforts to improve support for SDMs with the aim of improving the decision-making process end-of-life decisions, including when organ donation is involved.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of Quality Indicators on Analgesia, Sedation and Delirium in Intensive Care Patients and Their Impact on Outcome Indicators and Economic Indicators
NCT05384613
Comparison of the Incidence of Delirium Caused by Different Anesthetic Agents in Patients Undergoing Liver Transplantation
NCT06767579
Regional Anaesthesia in Intensive Care Unit
NCT05131633
Identification of Outcome Relevant Indicators in Routine Data
NCT04670744
Advance Directives and End-of-life Decision Making in Intensive Care Medicine in Germany
NCT01294189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
FAMILY_BASED
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multi-Methods Study
Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews
Step 2: National Telephone Survey
Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews
1. Cover SDMs' experience around:
* withdrawal of life sustaining therapies
* organ donation among those who were approached (including with the medical team and the organ donation organisation)
* understanding of the situation
* views on any gaps in the quantity or quality of information and discussion they received concerning their loved one's end-of-life care or donation process
2. Explore factors they perceived to influence their decision to consent to organ donation or not (or that would have influenced their decision for those not approached), and how such factors may have changed over the course of making this decision and since the decision (or since the event for those not approached).
Step 2: National Telephone Survey
Explore SDM's beliefs and experiences around end of life and assess which beliefs are associated with the decision taken at the end of life, including decision to donate organs or not (and the strength of this association)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews
1. Cover SDMs' experience around:
* withdrawal of life sustaining therapies
* organ donation among those who were approached (including with the medical team and the organ donation organisation)
* understanding of the situation
* views on any gaps in the quantity or quality of information and discussion they received concerning their loved one's end-of-life care or donation process
2. Explore factors they perceived to influence their decision to consent to organ donation or not (or that would have influenced their decision for those not approached), and how such factors may have changed over the course of making this decision and since the decision (or since the event for those not approached).
Step 2: National Telephone Survey
Explore SDM's beliefs and experiences around end of life and assess which beliefs are associated with the decision taken at the end of life, including decision to donate organs or not (and the strength of this association)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* SDM(s) of patients in the ICU with or without brain injury for whom withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies is considered or has been discussed.
* SDM(s) of patients for whom death is expected to occur within approximately 1 hour after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies
* English or French speakers SDM(s)
* SDM(s) reachable in ICU
Exclusion Criteria
* SDM asks to postpone the interview more than 3 times.
* SDM unable to provide informed verbal consent for any reason.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
OTHER_GOV
Ottawa Hospital Research Institute
OTHER
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Michael Chassé, MD PhD FRCPC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Foothills Medical Centre
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre
Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre
Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada
Hamilton General Hospital
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
London Health Sciences Centre
London, Ontario, Canada
The Ottawa Hospital
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
CHU de Québec - Université Laval
Québec, Quebec, Canada
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Crawshaw J, Presseau J, van Allen Z, Pinheiro Carvalho L, Jordison K, English S, Fergusson DA, Lauzier F, Turgeon AF, Sarti AJ, Martin C, D'Aragon F, Li AH, Knoll G, Ball I, Brehaut J, Burns KEA, Fortin MC, Weiss M, Meade M, Marsolais P, Shemie S, Zaabat S, Dhanani S, Kitto SC, Chasse M; Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e034594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CE 18.323
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.