Understanding Decision Making in the Intensive Care Unit: a National Study

NCT ID: NCT03850847

Last Updated: 2024-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING

Total Enrollment

292 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-08-01

Study Completion Date

2025-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Given how central Substitute Decision Makers (SDMs) are to the process leading to end of life decisions and sometimes, organ donation, it is striking how poorly understood this decision-making process is. A 2017 scoping review on the topic of soliciting SDM consent to organ donation reported on more than 168 studies covering a broad range of topics, including: SDM characteristics and predictors of consent; the process of soliciting consent; and the effect of the decision on subsequent process of care and on family well-being. An unexplored area, however, is factors - including modifiable factors - that influence SDM decision making at the end of life, which organ donation is part of, such as: responses to stress, support from extended families and friends, and personal beliefs about the ongoing medical conditions. This project seeks to fill this clear and important gap.

In the ICU, at the end of life, SDMs are under incredible emotional distress, have often not eaten or slept properly for days preceding discussions about end of life and organ donation, and are also in the midst of grieving for their loved one. The time pressure poses challenges for SDMs' decision making. Thus, this study will investigate novel, potentially modifiable reasons for end of life decision so that we may better support this personally challenging and important decision, especially if organ donation decision interferes with the decision process.

Primary objective: To investigate beliefs and experiences of SDMs involved in the decision-making process around withdrawal of life sustaining therapies .

Secondary objective: To inform efforts to improve support for SDMs with the aim of improving the decision-making process end-of-life decisions, including when organ donation is involved.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A national multicenter multi-methods study with SDMs will be conducted in two steps. In Step 1, a semi-structured interviews with SDMs will be conducted. The sampling frame will balance interviews with those that were approached or not for organ donation, and consented or not to organ donation. Interviews will be informed by two complementary theoretical frameworks. Building on Step 1 results, in Step 2 a national telephone survey of SDMs will be conducted to test which factors are associated with end-of-life decisions.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Organ Donation

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

FAMILY_BASED

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Multi-Methods Study

Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews

Step 2: National Telephone Survey

Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews

Intervention Type OTHER

1. Cover SDMs' experience around:

* withdrawal of life sustaining therapies
* organ donation among those who were approached (including with the medical team and the organ donation organisation)
* understanding of the situation
* views on any gaps in the quantity or quality of information and discussion they received concerning their loved one's end-of-life care or donation process
2. Explore factors they perceived to influence their decision to consent to organ donation or not (or that would have influenced their decision for those not approached), and how such factors may have changed over the course of making this decision and since the decision (or since the event for those not approached).

Step 2: National Telephone Survey

Intervention Type OTHER

Explore SDM's beliefs and experiences around end of life and assess which beliefs are associated with the decision taken at the end of life, including decision to donate organs or not (and the strength of this association)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Step 1: Semi-structured Interviews

1. Cover SDMs' experience around:

* withdrawal of life sustaining therapies
* organ donation among those who were approached (including with the medical team and the organ donation organisation)
* understanding of the situation
* views on any gaps in the quantity or quality of information and discussion they received concerning their loved one's end-of-life care or donation process
2. Explore factors they perceived to influence their decision to consent to organ donation or not (or that would have influenced their decision for those not approached), and how such factors may have changed over the course of making this decision and since the decision (or since the event for those not approached).

Intervention Type OTHER

Step 2: National Telephone Survey

Explore SDM's beliefs and experiences around end of life and assess which beliefs are associated with the decision taken at the end of life, including decision to donate organs or not (and the strength of this association)

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Substitute decision maker (SDM) and patients with at least 18 years old
* SDM(s) of patients in the ICU with or without brain injury for whom withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies is considered or has been discussed.
* SDM(s) of patients for whom death is expected to occur within approximately 1 hour after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies
* English or French speakers SDM(s)
* SDM(s) reachable in ICU

Exclusion Criteria

* SDM is not reachable after pre-consent in ICU (after 5 initial attempts within a 3-week period).
* SDM asks to postpone the interview more than 3 times.
* SDM unable to provide informed verbal consent for any reason.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role collaborator

Ottawa Hospital Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Michael Chassé, MD PhD FRCPC

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Foothills Medical Centre

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg Health Sciences Centre

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Queen Elizabeth II Health Sciences Centre

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton General Hospital

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London Health Sciences Centre

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

The Ottawa Hospital

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

CHU de Québec - Université Laval

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Sherbrooke

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Crawshaw J, Presseau J, van Allen Z, Pinheiro Carvalho L, Jordison K, English S, Fergusson DA, Lauzier F, Turgeon AF, Sarti AJ, Martin C, D'Aragon F, Li AH, Knoll G, Ball I, Brehaut J, Burns KEA, Fortin MC, Weiss M, Meade M, Marsolais P, Shemie S, Zaabat S, Dhanani S, Kitto SC, Chasse M; Canadian Donation and Transplantation Research Program and the Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Exploring the experiences and perspectives of substitute decision-makers involved in decisions about deceased organ donation: a qualitative study protocol. BMJ Open. 2019 Dec 23;9(12):e034594. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-034594.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31874899 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE 18.323

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Anaesthesia and mHealth
NCT03750084 UNKNOWN