Is There a Mechanistic Reason for the Response or Non-response to Isometric Exercise in Tendinopathy?
NCT ID: NCT03848598
Last Updated: 2019-02-22
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
20 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2019-08-31
2020-07-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Unfortunately, the study of Rio et al only consisted of 6 participants, and recent papers have contradicted the findings. In Achilles tendinopathy, plantar fasciopathy and lateral elbow tendinopathy, the pain relief was not consistently present, with "responders" and "non-responders" being found in these studies. Also, a study yet to be published (poster at conference), replicating Rio et al, also found a heterogeneous response, debunking the "one size fits all" approach that seemed to work.
However, in our understanding, isometric exercises do have a crucial role in early tendinopathy management, but the way the exercise is performed, in which position, what magnitude of load, time under tension, … has an important influence. The same protocol (5 repetitions of 45 second hold at 70% of maximum) might lead to big inter-individual differences. Therefore, there might be a mechanistic reason why some patients respond, and others do not.
Fortunately, the P.I. of this current trial application has recently optimized an ultrasound-based method to quantify local tendon deformation during exercises. The main purpose of this trial is therefore to evaluate the local tendon deformation pattern of patients with tendinopathy during isometric exercises and evaluate whether there is an interindividual difference in pattern between "responders" and "non-responders".
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Acute Effect of Isometric Versus Isotonic Resistance Exercise in Patients With Patellar Tendinopathy
NCT03528746
The Acute Effects of an Isometric Loading Intervention on Lower Extremity Landing Biomechanics in Individuals With Patellar Tendinopathy
NCT03262181
Efficacy of Eccentric Versus Isometric Exercise in Reducing Pain in Runners With Proximal Hamstring Tendinopathy
NCT04683107
Effects of TNT on Pain, ROM and Disability in Patients With RC Tendinopathy
NCT06707857
Exercise Therapy for Patellar Tendinopathy Evaluated With Advanced UTE-MRI
NCT02938143
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Responders
Patients suffering from patellar tendinopathy who have complete pain resolution after performing isometric exercises.
Evaluation of local tendon deformation
Ultrasound-based speckle tracking to evaluate the local tendon tissue displacement during isometric exercise.
Non-responders
Patients suffering from patellar tendinopathy who do not have complete pain resolution after performing isometric exercises.
Evaluation of local tendon deformation
Ultrasound-based speckle tracking to evaluate the local tendon tissue displacement during isometric exercise.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Evaluation of local tendon deformation
Ultrasound-based speckle tracking to evaluate the local tendon tissue displacement during isometric exercise.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* pain located at the proximal part of the patellar tendon
* painful at palpation the proximal part of the patellar tendon
* Numeric Rating Scale \> 1/10 with squat on decline (20°) board
Exclusion Criteria
* rupture of patellar tendon on ultrasound
* unclear differential diagnosis with patellofemoral pain
* concomitant neuromuscular disorders
18 Years
45 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stijn Bogaerts
Resident staff member Physical & Rehabilitation Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospitals
Leuven, Vlaams-Brabant, Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Stijn Bogaerts
Role: primary
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SBogaerts
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.