Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia
NCT ID: NCT03843463
Last Updated: 2025-09-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
PHASE2
88 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2021-07-18
2027-01-18
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects on Clinical and Functional Outcome of Escitalopram in Adult Stroke Patients
NCT00967408
Escitalopram for Agitation in Alzheimer's Disease
NCT03108846
Lexapro for the Treatment of Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) Depression & Other Psychiatric Conditions
NCT01368432
Dose-finding Study of Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors to Enhance Neuroplasticity
NCT04221256
Memantine Plus Es-citalopram in Elderly Depressed Patients With Cognitive Impairment
NCT01876823
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The investigators propose to conduct a Phase 2 multi-center, randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram for augmenting language intervention in subacute stroke. The investigators hypothesize that daily escitalopram for 90 days after stroke results in greater improvement (compared to placebo) in naming untrained pictures, as well as greater increase in content of picture description and greater improvement in morphosyntactic production, when combined with speech and language treatment (SALT). A second aim is to evaluate the mechanisms of language recovery in individuals who receive active medical treatment and those who receive placebo, using resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and genetic testing. The investigators hypothesize that greater improvement in language is associated with increased connectivity within the left hemisphere language network on rsfMRI in participants who receive escitalopram than in those who receive placebo, independently of improvement in depression. The investigators also hypothesize that the effects are greatest in individuals with val/val allele of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) - (consistent with previous studies showing a greater response to treatment and greater neuroplasticity in people with the val/val allele than those with one or more met alleles.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Naming Treatment + Escitalopram
10 mg escitalopram daily for three months (escalating from 5 mg per day for the first week and tapering to 5 mg per day for the last two weeks)
Escitalopram 10mg
Escitalopram tablet
Computer-delivered naming treatment
15 45-minute sessions of computer-delivered naming treatment beginning two months following stroke
Naming Treatment + Placebo
10 mg placebo daily for three months
Placebo
Sugar pill manufactured to mimic escitalopram 10 mg tablet
Computer-delivered naming treatment
15 45-minute sessions of computer-delivered naming treatment beginning two months following stroke
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Escitalopram 10mg
Escitalopram tablet
Placebo
Sugar pill manufactured to mimic escitalopram 10 mg tablet
Computer-delivered naming treatment
15 45-minute sessions of computer-delivered naming treatment beginning two months following stroke
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Participants must be fluent speakers of English by self-report.
* Participants must be capable of giving informed consent or indicating a legally authorized representative to provide informed consent.
* Participants must be age 18 or older.
* Participants must be within 5 days of onset of stroke.
* Participants must be pre-morbidly right-handed by self-report.
* Participants must have an aphasia diagnosis as confirmed by the Western Aphasia Battery-Revised (Aphasia Quotient \< 93.8).
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of schizophrenia, autism, or other psychiatric or neurological condition that affects naming/language
* A history of additional risk factors for torsades de pointes (TdP; e.g., heart failure, hypokalemia, family history of Long QT Syndrome)
* Current severe depression, defined as a score of \> 15 on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9)
* Uncorrected visual loss or hearing loss by self-report
* Use of any medication approved by the FDA for treatment of depression at the time of stroke onset
* Concomitant use of any monoamine oxidase inhibitors (MAOIs) or pimozide, or other drugs that prolong the QT/QTc interval, triptans (and other 5-Hydroxytryptamine Receptor Agonists), or other contraindications to escitalopram that may be identified.
* A QTc greater than 450 milliseconds on electrocardiogram or evidence of hyponatremia (Na \< 130) at baseline
* Pregnancy at the time of stroke or planning to become pregnant during the study term.
18 Years
99 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Johns Hopkins University
OTHER
University of South Carolina
OTHER
Medical University of South Carolina
OTHER
University of California, Irvine
OTHER
National Institute on Deafness and Other Communication Disorders (NIDCD)
NIH
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Argye Hillis-Trupe, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Johns Hopkins University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Johns Hopkins School of Medicine
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
University of South Carolina
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Argye E Hillis, MD
Role: primary
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Bhogal SK, Teasell R, Speechley M. Intensity of aphasia therapy, impact on recovery. Stroke. 2003 Apr;34(4):987-93. doi: 10.1161/01.STR.0000062343.64383.D0. Epub 2003 Mar 20.
Brady MC, Kelly H, Godwin J, Enderby P, Campbell P. Speech and language therapy for aphasia following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jun 1;2016(6):CD000425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000425.pub4.
Chollet F, Tardy J, Albucher JF, Thalamas C, Berard E, Lamy C, Bejot Y, Deltour S, Jaillard A, Niclot P, Guillon B, Moulin T, Marque P, Pariente J, Arnaud C, Loubinoux I. Fluoxetine for motor recovery after acute ischaemic stroke (FLAME): a randomised placebo-controlled trial. Lancet Neurol. 2011 Feb;10(2):123-30. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(10)70314-8. Epub 2011 Jan 7.
FOCUS Trial Collaboration. Effects of fluoxetine on functional outcomes after acute stroke (FOCUS): a pragmatic, double-blind, randomised, controlled trial. Lancet. 2019 Jan 19;393(10168):265-274. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32823-X. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
Doron R, Lotan D, Versano Z, Benatav L, Franko M, Armoza S, Kately N, Rehavi M. Escitalopram or novel herbal mixture treatments during or following exposure to stress reduce anxiety-like behavior through corticosterone and BDNF modifications. PLoS One. 2014 Apr 1;9(4):e91455. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0091455. eCollection 2014.
Enderby P, Broeckx J, Hospers W, Schildermans F, Deberdt W. Effect of piracetam on recovery and rehabilitation after stroke: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Clin Neuropharmacol. 1994 Aug;17(4):320-31. doi: 10.1097/00002826-199408000-00003.
Fridriksson J, Elm J, Stark BC, Basilakos A, Rorden C, Sen S, George MS, Gottfried M, Bonilha L. BDNF genotype and tDCS interaction in aphasia treatment. Brain Stimul. 2018 Nov-Dec;11(6):1276-1281. doi: 10.1016/j.brs.2018.08.009. Epub 2018 Aug 18.
Gu SC, Wang CD. Early Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitors for Recovery after Stroke: A Meta-Analysis and Trial Sequential Analysis. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018 May;27(5):1178-1189. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2017.11.031. Epub 2017 Dec 21.
Hayasaka Y, Purgato M, Magni LR, Ogawa Y, Takeshima N, Cipriani A, Barbui C, Leucht S, Furukawa TA. Dose equivalents of antidepressants: Evidence-based recommendations from randomized controlled trials. J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 15;180:179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2015.03.021. Epub 2015 Mar 31.
Hillis AE. The 'standard' for poststroke aphasia recovery. Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1316-7. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.585364. Epub 2010 Jun 10. No abstract available.
Hillis AE, Beh YY, Sebastian R, Breining B, Tippett DC, Wright A, Saxena S, Rorden C, Bonilha L, Basilakos A, Yourganov G, Fridriksson J. Predicting recovery in acute poststroke aphasia. Ann Neurol. 2018 Mar;83(3):612-622. doi: 10.1002/ana.25184. Epub 2018 Mar 10.
Hillis AE, Tippett DC. Stroke Recovery: Surprising Influences and Residual Consequences. Adv Med. 2014;2014:378263. doi: 10.1155/2014/378263.
Huber W, Willmes K, Poeck K, Van Vleymen B, Deberdt W. Piracetam as an adjuvant to language therapy for aphasia: a randomized double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997 Mar;78(3):245-50. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(97)90028-9.
Jorge RE, Acion L, Moser D, Adams HP Jr, Robinson RG. Escitalopram and enhancement of cognitive recovery following stroke. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2010 Feb;67(2):187-96. doi: 10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.185.
Kraglund KL, Mortensen JK, Damsbo AG, Modrau B, Simonsen SA, Iversen HK, Madsen M, Grove EL, Johnsen SP, Andersen G. Neuroregeneration and Vascular Protection by Citalopram in Acute Ischemic Stroke (TALOS). Stroke. 2018 Nov;49(11):2568-2576. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.117.020067.
Kurland J, Pulvermuller F, Silva N, Burke K, Andrianopoulos M. Constrained versus unconstrained intensive language therapy in two individuals with chronic, moderate-to-severe aphasia and apraxia of speech: behavioral and fMRI outcomes. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2012 May;21(2):S65-87. doi: 10.1044/1058-0360(2012/11-0113). Epub 2012 Jan 31.
Lam RW. Antidepressants and QTc prolongation. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2013 Mar;38(2):E5-6. doi: 10.1503/jpn.120256. No abstract available.
Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke. 2010 Jul;41(7):1485-8. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.109.577338. Epub 2010 Jun 10.
Marangolo P, Fiori V, Sabatini U, De Pasquale G, Razzano C, Caltagirone C, Gili T. Bilateral Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation Language Treatment Enhances Functional Connectivity in the Left Hemisphere: Preliminary Data from Aphasia. J Cogn Neurosci. 2016 May;28(5):724-38. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_00927. Epub 2016 Jan 25.
Mead GE, Hsieh CF, Lee R, Kutlubaev MA, Claxton A, Hankey GJ, Hackett ML. Selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) for stroke recovery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Nov 14;11(11):CD009286. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009286.pub2.
Pan XL, Chen HF, Cheng X, Hu CC, Wang JW, Fu YM, Kong HM, Shao HJ. Effects of Paroxetine on Motor and Cognitive Function Recovery in Patients with Non-Depressed Ischemic Stroke: An Open Randomized Controlled Study. Brain Impairment. 2018 May:1-7.
Saeterdal I, Pike E, Ringerike T, Gjertsen MK. Efficacy and Safety for the Newer Antidepressants in Adults [Internet]. Oslo, Norway: Knowledge Centre for the Health Services at The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH); 2007 Jun. Report from Norwegian Knowledge Centre for the Health Services (NOKC) No. 17-2007. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK464856/
Sanchez C, Reines EH, Montgomery SA. A comparative review of escitalopram, paroxetine, and sertraline: Are they all alike? Int Clin Psychopharmacol. 2014 Jul;29(4):185-96. doi: 10.1097/YIC.0000000000000023.
Sebastian R, Saxena S, Tsapkini K, Faria AV, Long C, Wright A, Davis C, Tippett DC, Mourdoukoutas AP, Bikson M, Celnik P, Hillis AE. Cerebellar tDCS: A Novel Approach to Augment Language Treatment Post-stroke. Front Hum Neurosci. 2017 Jan 12;10:695. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00695. eCollection 2016.
Wang C, Zhang Y, Liu B, Long H, Yu C, Jiang T. Dosage effects of BDNF Val66Met polymorphism on cortical surface area and functional connectivity. J Neurosci. 2014 Feb 12;34(7):2645-51. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3501-13.2014.
Walker-Batson D, Curtis S, Natarajan R, Ford J, Dronkers N, Salmeron E, Lai J, Unwin DH. A double-blind, placebo-controlled study of the use of amphetamine in the treatment of aphasia. Stroke. 2001 Sep;32(9):2093-8. doi: 10.1161/hs0901.095720.
Stockbridge MD, Fridriksson J, Sen S, Bonilha L, Hillis AE. Protocol for Escitalopram and Language Intervention for Subacute Aphasia (ELISA): A randomized, double blind, placebo-controlled trial. PLoS One. 2021 Dec 23;16(12):e0261474. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0261474. eCollection 2021.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IRB00268564
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.