Correlation of Renal Mass Pathologic Grade and Contrast Enhanced Ultrasound (CEUS)

NCT ID: NCT03821376

Last Updated: 2024-10-10

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

12 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-07-16

Study Completion Date

2021-09-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Patients with renal lesions suspicious for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have a variety of different treatment pathways available to them. Imaging surveillance is being used frequently on smaller renal masses, and radiologists are being asked to biopsy more renal lesions to better guide decision making by urology. This is in large part due to the pathologic grade of renal masses having been shown to correlate with patient outcomes. The World Health Organization (WHO) or Fuhrman grade is the standard grading scale used by pathologists for RCC. The goal of this study will be to correlate contrast enhanced ultrasound findings with the pathologic grade of RCC. Specifically, the investigators hypothesize that tumors with different pathologic grades will show different patterns of qualitative enhancement, as well as different perfusion kinetics.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Renal malignancies are relatively common, with lifetime risk ranging from 1 in 48 in men to 1 in 83 in women, of which RCC is the most common. RCC comes in a variety of subtypes, and pathologic grade has been shown to be one factor that correlates with patient prognosis \[Novara et al\]. The most commonly used pathologic grading systems are the WHO or Fuhrman scale, which rely on histologic features of the tumor such as nuclear size, irregularity, and nucleolar prominence.

Care of patients with RCC depends on a number of factors, including size and pathologic grade. As such, radiologic surveillance with CT and MRI is common, and percutaneous biopsy of renal masses for the purpose of pathologic grading is also relatively common. While percutaneous biopsy of renal masses is the least invasive way to obtain tissue, these still carry risks, especially of hemorrhage give the vascular nature of the kidneys and RCC.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound has been shown to have the ability to differentiate renal masses from normal background renal parenchyma \[Barr et al\]. It has the unique ability to be used in patients with renal dysfunction as it is excreted by the liver and lungs. As such, it is well suited for use in patients with underlying renal pathology. This study will aim to use contrast enhanced ultrasound to evaluate the qualitative and quantitative features of renal masses prior to surgical removal, and then evaluate for correlation of these features with pathologic grading following surgery.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Malignant Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Imaging findings for enrolled patients will be compared to pathologic grading
Primary Study Purpose

DIAGNOSTIC

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Imaging reviewers will be blinded to pathologic grade

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Renal malignancy

Patients with renal mass(es) identified by cross sectional imaging, specifically ultrasound following the intravenous injection of Lumason

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Contrast enhanced ultrasound with Lumason

Intervention Type DRUG

Following consent, they will undergo contrast enhanced ultrasound of their known renal mass(es). This will be performed at University hospital following intravenous administration of Lumason (2.5 mL per injection, maximum of 2 injections per mass).

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound with Lumason

Following consent, they will undergo contrast enhanced ultrasound of their known renal mass(es). This will be performed at University hospital following intravenous administration of Lumason (2.5 mL per injection, maximum of 2 injections per mass).

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Ultrasound

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Greater than or equal to 18 years of age
* Previously identified renal mass with radiology and clinical features consistent with RCC
* Clinical care plan includes partial or total nephrectomy

Exclusion Criteria

* Less than 18 years of age
* Currently pregnant
* Renal mass with clinical care plan that does not include nephrectomy
* Renal mass suspected to be non RCC neoplasm by imaging and clinical data
* Renal mass unable to be visualized by grayscale ultrasound
* Known renal vein thrombosis
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Indiana University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Jordan K. Swensson

Assistant Professor of Clinical Radiology

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jordan Swennson, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Indiana University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Indiana University Hospital

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1901057253

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.