Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Corifollitropin-alfa Late Start vs. Corifollitropin-alfa Standard Start in Expected Poor, Normal and High-responders Undergoing IVF
NCT ID: NCT03816670
Last Updated: 2019-01-25
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
113 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2017-04-01
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Controlled Ovarian Stimulation Versus Modified Natural Cycles in Poor Responders
NCT04487925
Use of Corifolitropin Alfa in Oocyte Donors
NCT02213627
Conventional Ovarian Stimulation vs. Single Injection Stimulation of Corifollitropin Alfa in Oocyte Donor
NCT03939403
Corifollitropin Alfa Versus Daily rFSH in the Controlled Ovarian Stimulation of Poor Responders
NCT02254928
Corifollitropin Alpha and Ovarian Response
NCT04416607
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. CF-alfa late start (day 4) will show comparable efficacy in terms of number of retrieved oocytes versus standard CF-alfa (day 2) protocol. In certain groups of patients, CF-alfa late start might show differences in terms of efficacy such as in poor-responder patients.
2. CF-alfa late start (day 4) will obtain similar results in terms of vital pregnancy rates with a similar safety profile with respect to COS performed using CF-alfa standard administration (day 2) in expected normal, poor, or high responders.
3. Oocytes and embryos obtained using CF-alfa late start will have comparable morphological features and development potential than those obtained with CF-alfa standard.
4. The patients' satisfaction will possibly be higher using CF-alfa late start than with CF-alfa standard expecially in those patients who will not have the need to add further daily recFSH injections
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
poor responders day 2
"poor responders" women stimulated with CF from day 2 of menstrual cycle
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
poor responders day 4
"poor responders" women stimulated with CF from day 4 of menstrual cycle
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
normal responders day 2
"normal responders" women stimulated with CF from day 2
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
normal responders day 4
"normal responders" women stimulated with CF from day 4
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
high responders day 2
"high responders" women stimulated with CF from day 2
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
high responders day 4
"high responders" women stimulated with CF from day 4
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Corifollitropin Alfa
late start (day 4) vs. corifollitropin-alfa standard start (day 2)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Male or tubal infertility with indication for IVF treatment
* No PCOS
* No previous IVF treatments in the past two months
* No history of previous Ovarian Hyperstimulation Syndrome (OHSS)
* No previous IVF cycle with more than 30 growing follicles ≥ 11 mm
* Antral Follicle Count (AFC) \<20
* No ovarian cyst nor malignant ovarian tumour, breast, uterus or central nervous cancer
Exclusion Criteria
* Età \> 43 anni
18 Years
43 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Turin, Italy
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alberto Revelli
Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Physiopathology of Reproduction and IVF Unit, S. Anna Hospital
Torino, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Revelli A, Gennarelli G, Sestero M, Canosa S, Carosso A, Salvagno F, Pittatore G, Filippini C, Benedetto C. A prospective randomized trial comparing corifollitropin-alpha late-start (day 4) versus standard administration (day 2) in expected poor, normal, and high responders undergoing controlled ovarian stimulation for IVF. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020 May;37(5):1163-1170. doi: 10.1007/s10815-020-01742-5. Epub 2020 Mar 18.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
IIS#53736
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.