Evaluation of Time Interval Between Ovulation Trigger With Triptorelin Acetate and Oocyte Retrieval

NCT ID: NCT02244151

Last Updated: 2018-02-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

130 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2014-09-30

Study Completion Date

2018-02-02

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of this study is to determine what is the best time interval between GnRH agonist (triptorelin acetate) ovulation induction allowing for the higher number of mature oocytes (MII) collected in IVF cycles.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) has been the gold standard for ovulation induction for several decades. When GnRH antagonist protocols were introduced, it became possible to trigger final oocyte maturation and ovulation with a single bolus of a GnRH agonist (GnRHa) as an alternative to hCG. The use of GnRHa to trigger final oocyte maturation has potential advantages: the simultaneous induction of a FSH surge, higher numbers of mature oocytes retrieved as compared to hCG and the total elimination of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome.

From the earliest reports of GnRHa for ovulation triggering, it has been presumed that the timing of the ovum pick-up (OPU) after GnRHa administration should be the same as after hCG triggering (34-36 h). However, differences exist regarding the duration and profile of the GnRHa induced surge of gonadotrophins when compared with that of hCG. Even more, differences in the intra-follicular mechanisms involved in ovulation have been described after GnRHa and hCG trigger.

No previous randomized controlled trials have been reported to evaluate the optimal interval of time between ovulation induction by GnRHa and oocyte collection.

The present study compares the ovarian response and the IVF outcomes after induction by triptorelin 0.2 mg at four different time intervals:

Group 1: OPU 24 hours after GnRHa administration. Group 2: OPU 30 hours after GnRHa administration. Group 3: OPU 40 hours after GnRHa administration. Group 4: control group: OPU 36 hours after GnRHa administration.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Female Urogenital Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DECAPEPTYL® diario

Group 1: DECAPEPTYL® diario,OPU 24 hours after GnRHa administration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decapeptyl® diario

Intervention Type DRUG

Decapeptyl® daily administration (Triptorelin acetate) and follicular puncture at 24, 30, 36 or 40 after administration.

Decapeptyl® diaro

Group 2:Decapeptyl® diario OPU 30 hours after GnRHa administration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decapeptyl® diario

Intervention Type DRUG

Decapeptyl® daily administration (Triptorelin acetate) and follicular puncture at 24, 30, 36 or 40 after administration.

Decapeptyl® diario.

Group 3: Decapeptyl® diario, OPU 40 hours after GnRHa administration.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Decapeptyl® diario

Intervention Type DRUG

Decapeptyl® daily administration (Triptorelin acetate) and follicular puncture at 24, 30, 36 or 40 after administration.

Decapeptyl® daily

Group 4: Decapeptyl® daily OPU 36 hrs after GnRH administration

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Decapeptyl® daily

Intervention Type DRUG

Decapeptyl® daily OPU 36 hrs after GnRH administration

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Decapeptyl® diario

Decapeptyl® daily administration (Triptorelin acetate) and follicular puncture at 24, 30, 36 or 40 after administration.

Intervention Type DRUG

Decapeptyl® daily

Decapeptyl® daily OPU 36 hrs after GnRH administration

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Decapeptyl® daily; GnRHa Decapeptyl® diario; GnRHa

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent prior to carry out any procedure associated with the clinical trial.
* Women between 18 and 37 years of age at the time of randomization (both ages included).

Basal serum levels of FSH \<10 mIU /ml.

* Serum AMH \> 5 to \<45 pmol / l.
* Antral follicle count \> 6 and \< 24.
* Vaginal ultrasound documenting correct visualization of both ovaries and the absence of significant ovarian pathology.
* Short stimulation protocol with GnRH antagonist and conventional dose for ovarian stimulation with 225-300 UI of rhFSH.
* Number of follicles ≥ 16 mm \> 5 on the ovulation induction day.

Exclusion Criteria

* Presence of severe endometriosis (Grade III-IV).
* Absence of one ovary due to previous surgery.
* Presence of significant uterine pathology (submucous myomas, endometrial polyp, malformations..)
* Diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome (defined according to the Rotterdam criteria).
* History of previous poor response to conventional ovarian stimulation protocols (\< 3 MII oocytes or canceled cycle)
* Severe male factor ( TMS\< 1 million).
* Participation in another RCT within the past one year.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

37 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alicia Marzal, M.D

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Grupo de Investigación en Medicina Reproductiva, IIS La Fe, Valencia ; Spain

César Díaz-García, M.D

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Unidad de Reproducción Humana, Area de Salud de la Mujer, Hospital Universitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain. Grupo de Investigación en Medicina Reproductiva, IIS La Fe, Valencia ; Spain

Antonio Pellicer, Professor

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Unidad de Reproducción Humana, Area de Salud de la Mujer, Hospital Universitaria La Fe, Valencia, Spain. Grupo de Investigación en Medicina Reproductiva, IIS La Fe, Valencia ; Spain.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Instituto de Investigacion Sanitaria La Fe

Valencia, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-005571-14

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

TIMING

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Cetrotide Treatment Optimization
NCT00866034 TERMINATED PHASE4