Usefulness of Corifollitropin α as Alternative to Conventional Daily rFSH Protocols in Oocyte Donors Undergoing Pituitary Suppression With Medroxiprogesterona Acetate (MPA)

NCT ID: NCT06193135

Last Updated: 2025-09-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

318 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2025-07-08

Study Completion Date

2025-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

IVF patients frequently experience physical, emotional or physicological burden; this is particularly relevant in the case of oocyte donors, since young women undergo a procedure that is of no health benefit to them. One of the phases of the treatment that contributes most to this situation is ovarian stimulation; as it involves the administration of daily injections which, in addition to the discomfort of administration, causes anxiety to the patient about its correct administration and possible side effects and to physicians concerns about patient compliance.

Advances in pharmacology and knowledge of ovarian pathophysiology have led to the development of new protocols that simplify and reduce drug administration, decrease the potential risk of misapplication and contribute to an improved patient experience. In this context, Corifollitropin α, a long-acting recombinant FSH (rFSH) molecule, provides with a single subcutaneous injection similar results as daily administration of rFSH during a week.

On the other hand, conventional stimulation protocols used in ART resort to using a GnRH analogue (agonist or antagonist) to prevent early luteinization, which is defined as the presence of a progesterone value of \> 1.5 ng/ml on the day of induced ovulation. Nevertheless, its use presents some disadvantages, such as it being sometimes complex to achieve desensitization or consistent hypothalamic block, risk of OHS when ovulation is triggered with HCG or its cost. Hence the interest in exploring new options to prevent a premature peak in LH. Nowadays, the oral administration of progestagens (progesterone-primed ovarian stimulation \[PPOS\]) during the follicular phase of ovarian stimulation (OS) has emerged as an attractive alternative to conventional protocols for preventing early luteinization. Moreover, PPOS produces a similar or even better, in some subgroups, response to OS (length of treatment, number of MII, cancelation rate, etc.), reproductive outcomes (pregnancy rate, live birth rate, etc) and safety (rate of ovarian hyperstimulation \[OHSS\] or congenital malformations).

Thus, PPOS would seem to be an effective option for personalized protocols, particularly when fresh embryo transfer (FET) is not to be performed, a circumstance that is likely to rise in frequency given the progressive increase in women's age at childbearing; for example, in oocyte donation, or in fertility preservation (FP) and preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A). However, very little data are available regarding cycle outcome following Corifollitropin α and PPOS as pituitary suppressor.

The present study, a prospective RCT, was designed to evaluate cycle characteristics (MII oocytes as the primary objective) and endocrinologic profiles of oocyte donors receiving Corifollitropin α and MPA as co-treatment compared with those receiving a daily dose of rFSH (follitropin β) as a control.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility, Female Reproductive Sterility

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Single-center, randomized, open-label, parallel-group, low-intervention, single-center clinical trial.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Elonva

Patients will undergo controlled ovarian stimulation with Corifolitropin α (Elonva), 100-150 micrograms (100 in\< 60kg and 150 ≥ 60 kg) + Progevera 10 mg.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corifolitropin Alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients will receive a single dose of Colifolitropin alfa, then will receive daily dose of Folitropin Beta since triggering criteria are met.

Puregon

Patients will undergo controlled ovarian stimulation with Folitropin β (Puregon) + Progevera 10 mg.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Folitropin Beta

Intervention Type DRUG

Patient will receive daily dose of Folitropin Beta since triggering criteria are met.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corifolitropin Alfa

Patients will receive a single dose of Colifolitropin alfa, then will receive daily dose of Folitropin Beta since triggering criteria are met.

Intervention Type DRUG

Folitropin Beta

Patient will receive daily dose of Folitropin Beta since triggering criteria are met.

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

ELONVA PUREGON

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signature of the subject's informed consent prior to any trial-related activity.
* Age between 18 and 35 years (both inclusive).
* Regular menstrual cycle, from 25 to 35 days (both inclusive).
* Absence of physical and psychological illness at the time of donation at the discretion of the investigator.
* BMI 18-28 kg/m2 (both inclusive) at the time of donation.
* No personal or family history of interest at the discretion of the investigator.
* Normal uterus and ovaries, without organic pathology.
* No polycystic ovaries.
* Antral follicle count greater than 12 in the sum of the two ovaries at the time of the screening visit.
* Normal karyotype.
* Negative infectious disease screening (Hepatitis B Virus, Hepatitis C Virus, Human Immunodeficiency Virus and Syphilis).
* General analysis with hemogram, hemostasis and biochemistry with parameters within normality.

Exclusion Criteria

* Concurrent participation in another clinical trial.
* Previous participation in this clinical trial.
* Use of long-term hormonal contraception (hormonal IUD or subcutaneous implants) at least 1 month prior to enrollment.
* Any systemic or metabolic disorder (i.e.: diabetes...) that contraindicates the use of gonadotropins.
* Personal history of thrombophlebitis and thromboembolic phenomena and hypertension.
* Severe hepatic insufficiency, cardiovascular disease
* Suspicion or evidence of breast malignancy or hormone-dependent genital organs.
* Known hypersensitivity to AMP or its excipients
* Any reason for exclusion from the oocyte donation program.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

35 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad, IVI VALENCIA

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

IVI Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Ivi Valencia

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Spain

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

JUAN GILES, PhD

Role: CONTACT

+34 963.05.90.00

LAURA CARACENA

Role: CONTACT

+34687031978 ext. 11054

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Juan Giles, MDPhD

Role: primary

Laura Caracena, Mrs

Role: backup

Laura Caracena, Study Coordinator

Role: primary

+34 687031978

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kalfoglou AL. Navigating conflict of interest in oocyte donation. Am J Bioeth. 2001 Fall;1(4):W1. doi: 10.1162/152651601317139333. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12858870 (View on PubMed)

Requena A, Cruz M, Collado D, Izquierdo A, Ballesteros A, Munoz M, Garcia-Velasco JA. Evaluation of the degree of satisfaction in oocyte donors using sustained-release FSH corifollitropin alpha. Reprod Biomed Online. 2013 Mar;26(3):253-9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2012.11.015. Epub 2012 Dec 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23352098 (View on PubMed)

Corifollitropin alfa Ensure Study Group. Corifollitropin alfa for ovarian stimulation in IVF: a randomized trial in lower-body-weight women. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010 Jul;21(1):66-76. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Mar 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20483664 (View on PubMed)

Boostanfar R, Shapiro B, Levy M, Rosenwaks Z, Witjes H, Stegmann BJ, Elbers J, Gordon K, Mannaerts B; Pursue investigators. Large, comparative, randomized double-blind trial confirming noninferiority of pregnancy rates for corifollitropin alfa compared with recombinant follicle-stimulating hormone in a gonadotropin-releasing hormone antagonist controlled ovarian stimulation protocol in older patients undergoing in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2015 Jul;104(1):94-103.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2015.04.018. Epub 2015 May 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26003273 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2304-VLC-051-JG

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.