Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-16
2019-05-22
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Primary aim:
To compare between opioid and opioid free anaesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in middle ear surgery
Secondary aim:
Monitoring analgesia, post-operative satisfaction and drowsiness.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparative Study Between Analgesic Effect of Opioid Free and Opioid Based Anesthesia in Radical Nephrectomy Surgery
NCT05312541
Different Modalities of Analgesia in Open Heart Surgeries in Mansoura University
NCT04223219
Opioid Free Anesthesia in Obese Patients.
NCT05481970
Techniques for Perioperative Analgesia for Live Liver Donors; A Pilot Study
NCT03393988
Opioid Versus Non-opioid Anesthesia for Ambulatory Surgery in Children
NCT03979469
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
(The sample size is approved to be sufficient by the Department of Statistics, Medical Research Institute, University of Alexandria).
Inclusion criteria:
* Patients of either sex.
* American Society Anesthesiologists' physical status I-II.
* Age between 18 and 50 years. Exclusion criteria:(depend on table 1)
* Patients with gastrointestinal disease.
* A history of motion sickness, or a previous episode of PONV.
* Patient received any opioid, steroid, or antiemetic medication within 72 h before surgery.
* Those who were pregnant or menstruating.
* History of opioid or drug abuse. METHODS Patients will be randomly allocated into two equal groups (thirty patients each) using the closed envelope method.
I will compare postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in patients scheduled for middle ear surgery. Sixty patients will be randomly allocated to receive either balanced anaesthesia (group A) using fentanyl, propofol and isoflurane, or opioid free anaesthesia (group B) using propofol and isoflurane. Pain scores, nausea ⁄ vomiting scores, conditions for surgery and analgesic requirements will be recorded post operatively.
Anaesthetic management Preoperative management
All patients will be visited before surgery to be clinically assessed and the preoperative surveillance includes:
* Haematological screening (Complete blood picture, Serum electrolytes).
* Standard coagulation studies e.g. prothrombin time, international normalized ratio (PT-INR).
On arrival to the operating room and before anaesthetic induction all patients will be monitored by the standard routine monitoring, which include:
* A 5-lead electrocardiography.
* A non-invasive blood pressure (NIBP) (mmHg).
* Pulse oximetry (%).
* Capnography. (End Tidal CO2 pattern and value in mmHg).
* Temperature monitoring. A peripheral intravenous cannula of 20 gauges will be inserted in a dorsal vein of the non-dominant hand.
Premedication with Midazolam in a dose of 0.02mg/ Kg will be used. Induction Preoxygenation with 100 % O2 for 3 minutes. General anaesthesia will be induced by propofol (2 mg/kg) and atracurium (0.5 mg/kg) intravenously guided by a nerve stimulator, followed by endotracheal intubation after loss of train of four.
All the patients will receive i.v. acetaminophen (1000 mg) \_20 min after induction and i.v. ketorolac (30 mg).
Local analgesia will be injected by surgeon. All patients will receive beta blocker (Inderal 1mg) and magnesium sulphate (15-30mg/kg) for achieving hypotensive anaesthesia.
Maintenance Maintenance of general anaesthesia with a mixture of isoflurane (1MAC) and oxygen.
All patients will be mechanically ventilated with an anaesthesia machine to keep SpO2 \> 95% and end-tidal CO2 between 35-45 mmHg.
Additional atracurium will be administrated as appropriate in bolus doses if needed.
Group A Fentanyl (1mg/kg i.v.) will be administered before general anaesthesia (GA). GA will be maintained with inhalation anaesthetics (isoflurane) at a minimum alveolar concentration of 0.7-1.3.
Group B Opioid free anesthesia (syringe of saline is given instead of fentanyl) and the same general anesthesia is given as group A(muscle relaxant ,propofol, inhalation for maintance).
Recovery At the end of surgery, isoflurane will be discontinued, 100% oxygen will be given, all patients will be planned for extubation in the operating room depending on recovery criteria after complete reversal of muscle relaxant with neostigmine (up to 5 mg).
Tracheal extubation will be performed in a semi- sitting position after fulfilling the criteria for extubation. Extubation criteria include: a fully conscious patient, haemodynamic stability, reversal of neuromuscular blockade, TOF ratio 0.9 - 1 on nerve stimulator, and the ability of head lift for 5 seconds.
Postoperative multimodal pain management Postoperative pain will be treated with i.v. acetaminophen (1000mg) and i.v. ketorolac (30 mg) every 6 h for the first 24 h. Postoperative pain will be measured on an 11-point numeric pointscale (NPS).
management of PONV Dexamethasone (8 mg i.v.) will be administered during induction, ondansetron (4 mg i.v.) and metoclopramide (10 mg i.v.) post operative if Patients complaining of PONV after discharge from the PACU.
Measurements
1. Demographic data:
Age (years), sex, weight (kilograms).
2. Hemodynamic parameters:
* Pulse oximetry (%)
* Heart rate (HR). Beats/minute
* Mean Non-Invasive arterial blood pressure (NIBP) (mmHg)
3. Pain assessment The level of pain will be assessed on an 11-point NPS. Patients will be asked to determine their own 'acceptable' pain score.
The 11-point numeric scale ranges from '0' representing no pain extreme to '10' representing the other pain extreme (worst pain imaginable).(8)
4. Nausea and vomiting assessment (table2,3) Patients will be asked to rate the worst episode of PONV on a four-point verbal rating scale (VRS) (none, mild, moderate, or severe). Patients were also will be asked whether they experienced retching or vomiting.
5. Sedation assessment
Sedation score:
0\. Alert
1. Mild, drowsy, easy to awake
2. Moderate, easy to arouse
3. Severe: somnolent difficult to arouse
4. Sleeping The Sedation score will be documented at 0, 1, 2, 4, 6, 12, 18, and 24 hours.
6\. Satsifacation of patient assessment by QoR40 questionnaire The QoR-40 is a global measure of quality of recovery. It incorporates five dimensions: patient support, comfort, emotions, physical independence, and pain; each item is graded on a five-point Likert scale. QoR-40 scores range from 40 (extremely poor quality of recovery) to 200 (excellent quality of recovery).(29) Timing Hemodynamic (blood pressure, pulse) of Patients will be assessed during the surgery every 10 minutes and at 1 and 2 h after the end of surgery and at discharge from the day unit. At each of these times, the nurse recorded the incidence and worst severity of pain, nausea and emesis since the last evaluation using the same criteria as before. Any medication will be given for pain or nausea (administered for moderate-severe symptoms, or at patient request) will be also recorded, till the time of discharge. Patients will be discharged with medication comprising slow-release ibuprofen. The following day, the researcher will telephone the patient to assess the incidence and worst severity of pain, nausea and emesis since discharge and whether any analgesia or antiemetics will be taken. Patients will be also asked to record their satisfaction with the control of pain, the control of sickness and their overall day surgery experience on 11-point (0-10) verbal rating scales.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Fentanyl Opioid Anesthesia
Fentanyl (1mg/kg i.v.) will be administered before general anaesthesia (GA). GA will be maintained with inhalation anaesthetics (isoflurane) at a minimum alveolar concentration of 0.7-1.3.
Fentanyl Opioid anesthesia
To compare between opioid and opioid free anaesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in middle ear surgery
Saline Nonopioid Anesthesia
Opioid free anesthesia (syringe of saline is given instead of fentanyl) and the same general anesthesia is given as group A(muscle relaxant ,propofol, inhalation for maintance).
Saline Nonopioid anesthesia
To compare between opioid and opioid free anaesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in middle ear surgery
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Fentanyl Opioid anesthesia
To compare between opioid and opioid free anaesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in middle ear surgery
Saline Nonopioid anesthesia
To compare between opioid and opioid free anaesthesia on post-operative nausea and vomiting in middle ear surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* American Society Anesthesiologists' physical status I-II.
* Age between 18 and 50 years.
Exclusion Criteria
* A history of motion sickness, or a previous episode of PONV.
* Patient received any opioid, steroid, or antiemetic medication within 72 h before surgery.
* Those who were pregnant or menstruating.
* History of opioid or drug abuse.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Alexandria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Mohammad Hazem I. Ahmad Sabry
Lecturer of Anesthesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Alexandria Faculty of Medicine
Alexandria, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Quemby DJ. Day surgery development and practice: key factors for a successful pathway. CEACCP 2014;14: 256-61.
Moore KL, Dalley AF. Clinically orientated anatomy. 4th ed. Philadelphia: Lippinocott Williams & Wilkins; 1999.
Dhillon RS, East CA. Ear, nose, throat, and head and neck surgery: an illustrated colored text. 2nd ed. New York, Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone;1999
Deacock AR. Aspects of anaesthesia for middle ear surgery an blood loss during stapedectomy. Proc R Soc Med. 1971 Dec;64(12):1226-8. doi: 10.1177/003591577106401226. No abstract available.
Miller RD. Miller's anesthesia, 6th ed. Vol 2. New York: Elsevier/Churchill Livingstone; 2005.
Morgan EG, Mikhail MS, Murray MJ. Clinical anesthesiology. 4th ed. New York: Lange Medical Books/McGraw-Hill; 2006.
Bailey CR. Management of outpatient ear, nose and throat surgery. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol. 2001 Dec;14(6):617-21. doi: 10.1097/00001503-200112000-00003.
Honkavaara P, Saarnivaara L, Klemola UM. Prevention of nausea and vomiting with transdermal hyoscine in adults after middle ear surgery during general anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth. 1994 Dec;73(6):763-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/73.6.763.
Fujii Y, Toyooka H, Tanaka H. Prophylactic antiemetic therapy with a combination of granisetron and dexamethasone in patients undergoing middle ear surgery. Br J Anaesth. 1998 Nov;81(5):754-6. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.5.754.
Fujii Y, Saitoh Y, Tanaka H, Toyooka H. Anti-emetic efficacy of prophylactic granisetron compared with perphenazine for the prevention of post-operative vomiting in children. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 1999 May;16(5):304-7. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2346.1999.00483.x.
Gombar S, Kaur J, Kumar Gombar K, Dass A, Singh A. Superior anti-emetic efficacy of granisetron-dexamethasone combination in children undergoing middle ear surgery. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2007 May;51(5):621-4. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2007.01296.x.
Bovill JG, Sebel PS, Stanley TH. Opioid analgesics in anesthesia: with special reference to their use in cardiovascular anesthesia. Anesthesiology. 1984 Dec;61(6):731-55.
Long DR, Lihn AL, Friedrich S, Scheffenbichler FT, Safavi KC, Burns SM, Schneider JC, Grabitz SD, Houle TT, Eikermann M. Association between intraoperative opioid administration and 30-day readmission: a pre-specified analysis of registry data from a healthcare network in New England. Br J Anaesth. 2018 May;120(5):1090-1102. doi: 10.1016/j.bja.2017.12.044. Epub 2018 Mar 9.
Golembiewski J, Chernin E, Chopra T. Prevention and treatment of postoperative nausea and vomiting. Am J Health Syst Pharm. 2005 Jun 15;62(12):1247-60; quiz 1261-2. doi: 10.1093/ajhp/62.12.1247.
Macario A, Weinger M, Truong P, Lee M. Which clinical anesthesia outcomes are both common and important to avoid? The perspective of a panel of expert anesthesiologists. Anesth Analg. 1999 May;88(5):1085-91. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199905000-00023.
Smith I, Terhoeve PA, Hennart D, Feiss P, Harmer M, Pourriat JL, Johnson IA. A multicentre comparison of the costs of anaesthesia with sevoflurane or propofol. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Oct;83(4):564-70. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.4.564.
Smith I, Thwaites AJ. Target-controlled propofol vs. sevoflurane: a double-blind, randomised comparison in day-case anaesthesia. Anaesthesia. 1999 Aug;54(8):745-52. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1999.00953.x.
Fleischmann E, Akca O, Wallner T, Arkilic CF, Kurz A, Hickle RS, Zimpfer M, Sessler DI. Onset time, recovery duration, and drug cost with four different methods of inducing general anesthesia. Anesth Analg. 1999 Apr;88(4):930-5. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199904000-00046.
Fredman B, Nathanson MH, Smith I, Wang J, Klein K, White PF. Sevoflurane for outpatient anesthesia: a comparison with propofol. Anesth Analg. 1995 Oct;81(4):823-8. doi: 10.1097/00000539-199510000-00028.
Shakir AAK, Ramachandra V, Hasan MA. Day surgery postoperative nausea and vomiting at home related to preoperative fentanyl. J One-day Surg 1997;6:10-1.
Apfel CC, Laara E, Koivuranta M, Greim CA, Roewer N. A simplified risk score for predicting postoperative nausea and vomiting: conclusions from cross-validations between two centers. Anesthesiology. 1999 Sep;91(3):693-700. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199909000-00022.
Vandermeulen EP. Controlling the stress response. In: White PF (ed). Textbook of Intravenous Anesthesia. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p. 565-79.
Borgeat A, Wilder-Smith OH, Saiah M, Rifat K. Subhypnotic doses of propofol possess direct antiemetic properties. Anesth Analg. 1992 Apr;74(4):539-41. doi: 10.1213/00000539-199204000-00013.
Gan TJ, Glass PSA. Balanced anesthesia. In: White PF (ed). Textbook of Intravenous Anesthesia. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1997. p. 347-74.
Smith I. Inhalational anesthetic agents. In: Hemmings HC, Hopkins PM (eds). Foundations of Anesthesia. 2nd ed. London: Elsevier; 2005. p. 311-21.
Ziemann-Gimmel P, Goldfarb AA, Koppman J, Marema RT. Opioid-free total intravenous anaesthesia reduces postoperative nausea and vomiting in bariatric surgery beyond triple prophylaxis. Br J Anaesth. 2014 May;112(5):906-11. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet551. Epub 2014 Feb 18.
Bakan M, Umutoglu T, Topuz U, Uysal H, Bayram M, Kadioglu H, Salihoglu Z. Opioid-free total intravenous anesthesia with propofol, dexmedetomidine and lidocaine infusions for laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2015 May-Jun;65(3):191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.05.001. Epub 2014 Jun 3.
Feld JM, Hoffman WE, Stechert MM, Hoffman IW, Ananda RC. Fentanyl or dexmedetomidine combined with desflurane for bariatric surgery. J Clin Anesth. 2006 Feb;18(1):24-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2005.05.009.
Gornall BF, Myles PS, Smith CL, Burke JA, Leslie K, Pereira MJ, Bost JE, Kluivers KB, Nilsson UG, Tanaka Y, Forbes A. Measurement of quality of recovery using the QoR-40: a quantitative systematic review. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Aug;111(2):161-9. doi: 10.1093/bja/aet014. Epub 2013 Mar 6.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
050108073(18/12/2018)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.