Monitor-Guided Analgesia During General Anesthesia - Part I

NCT ID: NCT03303651

Last Updated: 2018-04-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

48 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-16

Study Completion Date

2018-01-26

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This prospective randomized clinical trial evaluates the effects of a monitor-guided opioid analgesia during general anesthesia. To date no standard-monitoring device exists to specifically reflect the analgesic component of general anesthesia. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and should be improved by limiting the opioid analgesic's dosage to the minimum amount needed. The study compares the effects of monitoring nociception during general anesthesia with different innovative techniques in comparison to routine clinical practice.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This prospective randomized clinical study aims to investigate the effects of a monitor-guided opioid analgesia during general anesthesia by different monitoring systems in comparison to routine clinical practice. Many surgical procedures require general anesthesia. The main components of general anesthesia are hypnosis and analgesia, and anesthesiologists usually combine a hypnotic drug with an opioid analgesic.

Until today, however, there is no standard-monitoring of nociception to specifically reflect the analgesic component of general anesthesia. In clinical practice the opioid dosage is chosen by clinical judgment of the attending anesthesiologist based upon changes of heart rate, blood pressure, pupil size, lacrimation and sweating of the patient.

On the one hand, underdosage of opioids can cause nociception leading to an increased sympathetic tone, increase of plasma levels of stress hormones, nociceptive movements as well as increase postoperative pain. On the other hand, overdosage of opioids can lead to drug side effects such as nausea and vomiting, hemodynamic instability, an increase in recovery times, immunosuppression and an increase in postoperative pain by opioid-induced-hyperalgesia. Quality and safety of general anesthesia are of major clinical importance and can be improved by limiting the administration of opioid analgesics to the optimal individual dose needed. In the last years, different analgesia monitoring devices have been developed for monitoring nociception. The present study evaluates the effects of the administration of opioids during general anesthesia guided by three different monitoring systems in comparison to routine clinical practice. After institutional approval by the Ethics committee of the Medical Board of the City of Hamburg, Germany and obtaining patients' written informed consent the investigators randomize elective patients with major abdominal surgery for open radical prostatectomy into one of four treatment groups.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pain Pain, Postoperative Nociceptive Pain Opioid Use Analgesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Participants are assigned to intervention groups by chance
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Outcome Assessors
Participants are not informed about the group assignement (intervention takes place in general anesthesia). Outcome assessors are persons without knowledge on former treatment in intervention/control group.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

PPI (Pain Pupillary Index)

Opioid administration guided by Pain Pupillary Index (PPI) derived from Videopupillometry performed with the device AlgiScan manufactured by IDMed, Marseille, France. The device measures the degree of pupillary reflex dilation (PRD) following an electric nociceptive stimulation. It automatically increases the intensity of the electric stimulation from 10 to 60 milliampere depending on the degree of PRD and afterwards displays the PPI. The numerical index ranges from 0 to 10. A low PPI score indicates a deep analgesia, a high PPI score indicates an insufficient or light analgesia. A PPI score of 2 or 3 is supposed to represent an optimal level of analgesia according to the manufacturer. 5 µg sufentanil will be administered every 5 minutes if PPI score is calculated more than 3.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Opioid administration in intervention groups

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by analgesia indices during general anesthesia in the experimental arms.

SPI (Surgical Pleth Index)

Opioid administration (sufentanil) guided by by Surgical Pleth Index (SPI) derived from photoplethysmography performed by the device CARESCAPE B650 Patient Monitor from the manufacturer GE (General Electrics) Healthcare, Helsinki, Finland. Included in the monitoring system is a software that continuously calculates the SPI from normalized heart rate and pulse wave amplitude derived from finger plethysmography. The numerical index ranges between 0 (low sympathetic tone) and 100 (high sympathetic tone). A SPI score between 20 and 50 has been proposed as the target range to guide analgesics (15 - 17). 5 µg Sufentanil will be administered every 5 minutes if SPI score is calculated more than 50.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Opioid administration in intervention groups

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by analgesia indices during general anesthesia in the experimental arms.

NOL (Nociception Level)

Opioid administration (sufentanil) guided by Nociception Level (NOL) derived from finger photoplethysmography performed with the analgesia monitoring device PMD200 manufactured by Medasense, Ramat Gan, Israel. The device continuously calculates the NOL with a multi-parametric approach from pulse rate, pulse rate variability, pulse wave amplitude, skin conductance level, skin conductance fluctuations, skin temperature and finger motion. The composite algorithm of the device analyses the data and the numerical index NOL is presented on a scale from 0 (no pain) to 100 (extreme pain) (18). A NOL score between 10 and 25 has been proposed as the target range to guide analgesics. 5 µg Sufentanil will be administered every 5 minutes if NOL score is calculated more than 25.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Opioid administration in intervention groups

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by analgesia indices during general anesthesia in the experimental arms.

Control

Opioid administration (sufentanil) guided according to standard clinical practice of the attending anesthesiologist based upon changes of heart rate, blood pressure, lacrimation and sweating of the patient.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Opioid administration in control group

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by clinical signs in the control group.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Opioid administration in intervention groups

Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by analgesia indices during general anesthesia in the experimental arms.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Opioid administration in control group

Elective surgery in radical open abdominal prostatectomy. Opioid titration is guided by clinical signs in the control group.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Radical open abdominal prostatectomy scheduled in the operation theater where the study is conducted
* \> 18 years

Exclusion Criteria

* Chronic pain therapy, e.g. out-of-hospital opioid therapy
* Beta blocker and digitalis therapy
* Eye disease with affection of pupil reactivity
* Pacemaker therapy
* Higher degrees of cardiac arrhythmias, e.g. atrial fibrillation
* Pre-operative medication with steroids
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Rainer Nitzschke, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center

Sandra Funcke, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesiology; Center of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hamburg Eppendorf University Medical Center

Hamburg, , Germany

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Germany

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20170824

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Opioid-Free Orthopaedics
NCT04659317 RECRUITING PHASE3