Open-Label, Randomised, Active Controlled, Multi-Centre Phase 3 Study Safety and Efficacy of Danaparoid vs Argatroban
NCT ID: NCT03809481
Last Updated: 2022-12-08
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
7 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-05-16
2022-06-10
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Argatroban Monitoring in Acute Suspected Heparin-induced Thrombocytopenia.
NCT06066762
Argatroban Versus Lepirudin in Critically Ill Patients
NCT00798525
A Comparative Sudy Comparing Argatroban® IV vs Desirudin SC for Suspected HIT With or Without Thrombosis Syndrome
NCT00787332
Secondary Prevention of Venous Thrombo Embolism (VTE).
NCT00329238
Full Dose Heparin Vs. Prophylactic Or Intermediate Dose Heparin in High Risk COVID-19 Patients
NCT04401293
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary:
To show that for the treatment of subjects with acute heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) danaparoid use is not inferior to argatroban in terms of efficacy. The primary efficacy endpoint (composite endpoint) is defined as treatment response at Day 44.
A subject will be considered a treatment responder, if none of the following events occur by Day 44:
* New or extended venous and/or arterial thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis Note: 'thrombosis' denotes venous and/or arterial here and throughout the protocol
* All-cause mortality
* Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
Secondary/Exploratory:
To collect additional efficacy data
* Percentage of subjects with increase in platelet count to values ≥ 100,000/ μL at day 14
* Deaths due to TE or bleeding up until Day 44
* Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding up until Day 44
Note: As outlined by the Control of Anticoagulation Subcommittee major bleeding in non-surgical subjects is defined as:
1. Fatal bleeding, and/or
2. Symptomatic bleeding in a critical area or organ, such as intracranial, intraspinal, intraocular, retroperitoneal, intra-articular or pericardial, or intramuscular with compartment syndrome, and/or
3. Bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20 g/L (1.24 mmol/ L) or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood or red cells
* New or extended thrombosis, including gangrene/skin necrosis
* Unplanned amputation, including ischemic gut resection
* All-cause mortality
Exploratory
* Time to first event (new/extended thrombosis, all cause mortality, unplanned amputation)
* Time to reach consistent increase in 3 consecutive alternate day platelet count measurements during acute treatment
* Incidence of new or extended TE events, including gangrene/skin necrosis up until Day 14
* Incidence of all-cause mortality up until Day 14
* Incidence of unplanned amputation up until Day 14
* Incidence of fatal or non-fatal major bleeding up until Day 14
To describe the safety of danaparoid in comparison to argatroban
* All-cause mortality
* Incidence of fatal and non-fatal major bleeding events (as defined above) during the acute treatment and then the entire follow-up period (until Day 44)
* Incidence of serious adverse events (SAEs)
* Incidence of adverse events (AEs)
* Changes in vital parameters (heart rate, blood pressure, and respiratory rate) and 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG)
* Incidence of positive pre-danaparoid cross reactivity in the Heparin-induced Platelet Activation (HIPA) assay (Greinacher. 1991)
* Safety laboratory parameters
Design:
This is a Phase 3, open-label, randomized, active-controlled, multi-center study to evaluate the safety and efficacy of danaparoid versus argatroban in treatment of subjects with acuteHIT.
Subjects who develop a reduction in platelet count (PC) greater than or equal to 30% compared with the higher of their pre-heparin treatment count or their highest platelet count after the start of heparin either
1. Between Days 4 and 14 of the start of heparin treatment with or without thrombosis or
2. At Day 1 of heparin treatment and recent heparin exposure (within the last 30 days with or without thrombosis) and who have a score on the 4Ts test of \>3 will be considered for study enrollment as a Suspected HIT.
Subjects who have tested negative in available screening tests for HIT within the last 48 hours before enrollment will not be considered for study enrollment, unless new clinical symptoms occurred.The following will occur for all subjects (regardless of whether they had a screening HIT test performed in the enrolling hospital or not):
1. All heparin administration must be ceased after strong clinical suspicion of HIT, based on clinical evaluation of the subject, including the use of heparin-bonded vascular access catheters and circuits as well as heparin flushes.
2. Subject must be randomized into the study and treated with the study drug or transferred to alternative non-heparin anticoagulant in situations where study drug cannot be started within 2 hours after stop of heparin.
3. A blood sample may be taken at the same time for HIT testing according to local practice.
4. The investigator will assess the subject for eligibility for the HITSOVA study by clinical criteria (4T score \>3) and inclusion and exclusion criteria.
5. If eligible, written informed consent will be obtained from the subject or a legal guardian and the subject will be randomized to receive study drug. .
6. A new blood sample for HIPA/ PF4/heparin IgG ELISA and anti-danaparoid antibodies and cross reactivity has to be obtained to allow consistent blood sample labelling and documentation before start of study drug, regardless whether another blood sample for HIT testing according to local practice had been obtained at the time of suspicion of HIT
Note, although use of non-heparin treatment for suspected HIT is allowed before enrollment of the subject into the HITSOVA study, the study drug should be started as soon as possible, but no later than 48 hours. In such situation, all time points specified in this protocol, will be calculated from the time of first dose of study drug.
HIT diagnosis will be confirmed serologically by the HIPA assay and a specific PF4/heparin IgG ELISA test for the HIT IgG by the nominated central laboratory based in Greifswald, Germany Subjects with a positive HIPA assay and a positive HIT IgG antigen test with optical density (OD) \> 0.5 will be classified as confirmed HIT, and treatment with randomized study drug will continue.Subjects with negative HIPA assay and a positive HIT IgG antigen test with an optical density (OD) \>0.5 and subjects with a positive HIPA assay but a negative HIT IgG antigen test OD ≤0.5 will be classified as suspected HIT and treatment with randomized study drug will continue. These subjects will later be adjudicated retrospectively by the Adjudication Committee (AdjC) and then grouped into highly likely HIT or non-HIT.
All other subjects will be considered as non-HIT and the subjects will be removed from the protocol, study drug will be discontinued, and further procedures and treatment will be given at the discretion of the Investigator according to local standard practice. These subjects will be followed to Day 44 after their first dose of study drug for assessment of safety.
During the treatment period if it becomes necessary for an operation, invasive vascular procedure or acute kidney injury requiring the use of an extracorporeal circulation machine develops, then specific dosing instructions are available.
If the acute kidney injury does not recover during the treatment period and the use of an extracorporeal circulation machine is required longer, then the subject will not be eligible to be included in the per protocol set (PPS), but will still be eligible to be included in the full analysis set (FAS).
Study Population:
All subjects who develop a reduction in platelet count (PC) ≥ 30% compared to the higher of their pre-heparin treatment count or their highest platelet count after the start of heparin at either
a) between Days 4 and 14 of the start of heparin treatment with or without thrombosis or b) at Day 1 of heparin treatment (and recent heparin exposure within the last 30 days) with or without thrombosis and who have a score on the 4Ts test of \>3 and who are later suspected HIT by the HIPA assay or HIT IgG..
Clinical signs of HIT are
* New thrombosis, on either side (arterial or venous) of the circulation
* Acute systemic reaction when heparin infusion was given:
* Fever
* Chills
* High blood pressure
* Tachycardia
* Shortness of breath
* Chest pain
* Transient global amnesia
* White clot syndrome
* Skin necrosis
* Occlusion of an extracorporeal circuit
Pediatric subjects will not be included in every country in this study. The countries that allow inclusion of pediatric patients are France, USA,and Italy.
It is anticipated that some subjects will be dosed with alternative non-heparin anti-coagulants prior to completing enrollment steps for this study. These subjects can be enrolled in the study as long as the exposure to those treatments is less than 48 hours.
Baseline/screening (Day 0) and enrollment into the study (Day1) can occur on the same day. In this case the assesments for Day 0 and Day 1, should only be performed once.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Danaparoid Sodium
Subjects will receive danaparoid via IV infusion for at least 7 days then transition to a VKA. IV loading bolus injection of 2250 U, followed by 400 U/h for 4 hours, then 300 U/h for 4 hours, then a maintenance infusion of 150-200 U/h.
Danaparoid Sodium
inhibits thrombin generation by indirect anti-Xa inhibition and direct inhibition of factor IX activation
Argatroban
Subjects will receive argatroban 2 microgram/kg/min as a continuous infusion, titrated to an aPTT that is 1.5 to 3.0 x initial baseline value, but not exceeding 100 seconds.
Argatroban
Synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Danaparoid Sodium
inhibits thrombin generation by indirect anti-Xa inhibition and direct inhibition of factor IX activation
Argatroban
Synthetic direct thrombin inhibitor
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Males or females aged ≥2 weeks
3. Subjects with suspected HIT by 4Ts of \>3 and with reduction of platelet count of ≥ 30% at either:
1. Between Day 4 and 14 of the start of heparin exposure or
2. At Day 1 of heparin exposure with pre-treatment with heparin within the last 30 days, with or without thrombosis.
4. Have adequate renal function: estimated glomerular filtration rate (eeGFR) ≥ 15 mL/min/1.73 m²
5. Male participants:
A male participant must agree to use contraception during the treatment period and for at least 5 days after the last dose of study intervention and refrain from donating sperm during this period.
6. Female participants: female participant is eligible to participate if 1 of the following conditions applies:
Not a woman of childbearing potential or A woman of childbearing potential who agrees to follow the contraceptive guidance during the treatment period and during the entire VKA use and for one month after cessation of its use. Subjects should continue with adequate contraception after the study end if they continue with VKA use. (Subjects taking oral contraceptives or hormone replacement therapy must have a stable dose and regimen for ≥ 3 months prior to entry into the study.)
Exclusion Criteria
1. Premature infants (corrected age \<37 weeks gestational age)
2. Subjects undergoing Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (ECMO) treatment
3. Fibrinolytic therapy \<24 hours before enrollment
4. Lumbar puncture or spinal/epidural catheter placement within the past 48 hours
6. Active bleeding
7. Subjects with the following conditions to be excluded if alternative antithrombotic treatments are available:
(i) Severe hemorrhagic diathesis, (ii) Traumatic damage to the central nervous system (iii) Brain, spinal or ophthalmologic surgery (iv) Active stomach/duodenal ulcers or active peptic ulcer unless this ulcer is the cause of the surgical procedure
8. An unexplained activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) \> 2 x the normal range
9. A hemorrhagic cerebrovascular accident within the previous 3 months
10. Severe, uncontrolled hypertension defined as blood pressure \>180/110 mmHg
11. Diabetic retinopathy
12. Acute bacterial endocarditis
13. Expectation of a long-term (\> 3 weeks) hemodialysis requirement before the end of the acute treatment
14. Hypersensitivity to the active substances or to any of the excipients
15. Hypersensitivity to sulphite
16. Any investigational drug(s) use within 4 weeks preceding screening or anticipated use during the course of the study
17. Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
18. Use of intra-aortic balloon pump, or ventricular assist device
19. Use of any non-heparin anticoagulant treatment for suspected HIT for more than 48 hours before enrollment.
2 Weeks
100 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Aspen Global Incorporated
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shands University of Florida
Gainesville, Florida, United States
University of Minnesota Medical Center
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Duke University Medical Center
Durham, North Carolina, United States
The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center
Houston, Texas, United States
Clinical Center of the Republic of Srpska, Medical Intesnive Care Unit
Banja Luka, Republika Srpska, Bosnia and Herzegovina
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Clinic for cardiology
Banja Luka, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
University Clinical Centre of the Republic of Srpska, Lung Clinic
Banja Luka, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for Heart, Blood Vessels and Rheumatic Diseases
Sarajevo, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Clinical Center University of Sarajevo, Clinic for Lung Diseases
Sarajevo, , Bosnia and Herzegovina
Jewish General Hospital
Montreal, , Canada
CHU St Etienne; Avenue Albert Raimond
Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, Auvergne-Rhône-Alpes, France
DIJON University Hospital
Dijon, Burgundy, France
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Amiens Picardie
Amiens, Somme, France
Vivantes Klinikum im Friedrichhain Hämophiliezentrum, Gerinnungssprechstunde Landsberger Allee 49
Berlin, Berlin-Brandenburg, Germany
Universitätsklinikum Gießen und Marburg GmbH, Klinik für Herz-, Kinderherz- und Gefäßchirurgie Standort Gießen
Giesen, Lower Saxony, Germany
Städtisches Klinkum Dresden
Dresden, Saxony, Germany
Universitatstklinikum Halle (Saale), Medizinische Klinik III
Halle, Saxony-Anhalt, Germany
University Hospital Greifswald Dpt. of Hematology
Greifswald, , Germany
Zentrum für Klinische Transfusionsmedizin
Tübingen, , Germany
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria S.Orsola-Malpighi - UO Angiologia e Malattie della Coagulazione
Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy
AOU Careggi, SOD Malattie Aterotrombotiche
Florence, Florence, Italy
ASST Papa Giovanni XIII, Servizio di Immunoematologia e Medicina Trasfusionale
Bergamo, Lombardy, Italy
Instituto Scientifico San Raffaele- Servizio Coagulazione e Centro Trombosi
Milan, , Italy
Centrum Medyczne HCP Sp. z o.o. Szpital im. Św. Jana Pawła II
Poznan, , Poland
Wojewódzki Szpital Zespolony im. L. Rydygiera
Torun, , Poland
First City Hospital N.A. E.E. Volosevich
Arkhangelsk, , Russia
Moscow City Hospital 67
Moscow, , Russia
Oncology Center
Omsk, , Russia
Regional Hospital after N.N Burdenko
Penza, , Russia
Clinical Hospital № 122 N. A. L.G. Sokolov
Saint Petersburg, , Russia
The Institute for Pulmonary Disease of Vojvodina, Pulmonary thromboembolism department
Novi Sad, Sremska Kamenica, Serbia
Clinical Centre of Serbia, Clinic for Emergency Internal Medicine
Belgrade, , Serbia
Clinical centre of Serbia, Clinic for Pulmonology
Belgrade, , Serbia
Instiute of Cardiovascular Diseases "Dedinje"
Belgrade, , Serbia
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
ERGCR-18-ORGHIT-001
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.