Electrical Muscle Stimulation in Congestive Heart Failure

NCT ID: NCT03793647

Last Updated: 2021-04-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-04-01

Study Completion Date

2021-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This trial is to evaluate two types of electrical muscle Stimulation (EMS) stimulation (low intensity "conventional stimulation" vs. high intensity "Russian" stimulation) of legs in comparison with a control group without EMS in a cohort of elderly patients with severe deconditioning after CHF decompensation.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

BACKGROUND:

Congestive heart failure (CHF) is increasingly prevalent worldwide and is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Poor exercise capacity is well known as a risk factor for poor prognosis. The deconditioning is mainly associated with a decrease in leg muscle mass and loss of leg strength as well as loss of muscle endurance. This affects especially elderly patients. To improve this condition in CHF electrical muscle stimulation (EMS) is a suitable method of training, which hardly affects the heart. However, most EMS existing stimulation protocols are uncomfortable and not user-friendly, especially for elderly patients. The Russian space medicine has many years' experience in specific EMS stimulation protocols, which are well tolerated by cosmonauts for hours even during working activities. Therefore, a research project has been established between the Russian Academy of Sciences (Laboratory for Biomedical Problems) and the ARTORG Research Center for Biomedical Engineering to study the effects of new developed EMS procedures in elderly persons.

Aims:

The aim of trial is to evaluate two types of EMS stimulation (low intensity "conventional stimulation" vs. high intensity "Russian" stimulation) of legs in comparison with a control group without EMS in a cohort of elderly patients with severe deconditioning after CHF decompensation.

METHOTOLOGY:

This prospective, randomized controlled study will use commercially available electronic stimulator devices (Medel GmbH, Hamburg, Germany) for EMS. For the "Russian" stimulation, an especial developed stimulator (Amplidin-EST No.5) will be used for frequency modulation of the stimulation impulse, which is supposed to make stimulation sensation more comfortable. Supervised EMS training will be performed 5 times per week (weekdays) during 30 minutes over a period of 6 weeks in elderly deconditioned CHF patients, starting at the Kantonsspital Olten during the hospitalisation and continued at home. We will include 20 patients in each group (20 in control group, 20 in low intensity "conventional group and 20 in high intensity "Russian" group). The control group was preformed to exclude an attention bias in the study results. The primary endpoint of the study is the difference in maximum oxygen uptake (peak VO2) and in 6 minutes walking distance between baseline and after 6-weeks EMS training in all groups (high intensity vs low intensity vs control). The follow-up period is planned for 2 years.

POTENTIAL SIGNIFICANCE:

Exercise capacity and quality of life in severely deconditioned patients with CHF is poor and life expectancy is low. While the possibilities to improve the poor condition and function of the heart by pharmaceutical therapies are limited, there is potential to improve the condition of the peripheral muscles by exercise training. However, a successful aerobic training is rarely feasible in these patients. Therefore, EMS training may prove to be ideal tool to improve leg muscle mass and function of elderly patients. Because, CHF patients do not tolerate most of the existing EMS stimulation protocols, we have developed a new EMS stimulation protocol. The application is virtually painless and therefore well tolerated over hours due to a sophisticated stimulation protocol. Therefore, we hope that, this especial for elderly CHF patients developed training protocol, may improve their daily activity as well as their quality of life.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Congestive Heart Failure Electric Muscle Stimulation Severe Decondition Elderly Person Exercise Capacity Activities of Daily Living

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Prospective, randomized controlled study
Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Low Intensity EMS

Conventional Stimulation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Electrical muscle devise

Intervention Type DEVICE

evaluate two types of EMS stimulation of legs

High Intensity EMS

Russian Stimulation

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Electrical muscle devise

Intervention Type DEVICE

evaluate two types of EMS stimulation of legs

Placebo

no Stimulation, supported by phone contact

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Electrical muscle devise

Intervention Type DEVICE

evaluate two types of EMS stimulation of legs

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Electrical muscle devise

evaluate two types of EMS stimulation of legs

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* age ≥ 60 years
* hospitalized due to heart failure
* left ventricular ejection fraction ≤ 40%
* NYHA class II to IV
* willingness to complete the 6-week EMS training programme
* tolerability of the electrical stimulation
* provision of informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* severe neuromuscular or oncologic diseases with inability to perform exercise testing and EMS training
* inotropic intravenous agents used (≤10 days)
* implanted pacemaker/ICD
* unstable angina
* severe uncontrolled arrhythmias
* patients with severe pulmonary limitation (Tiffeneau ratio \<70%, or vital capacity \<70% of predicted value)
Minimum Eligible Age

60 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Kantonsspital Olten

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nisha Arenja

Principle Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nisha Arenja

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kantonsspital Olten

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kantonsspital Olten

Olten, , Switzerland

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Nisha Arenja, Dr

Role: CONTACT

0041 62 311 49 45

Hugo Saner, Prof.

Role: CONTACT

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Nisha Arenja, Dr

Role: primary

0041 62 311 49 45

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Deley G, Kervio G, Verges B, Hannequin A, Petitdant MF, Salmi-Belmihoub S, Grassi B, Casillas JM. Comparison of low-frequency electrical myostimulation and conventional aerobic exercise training in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005 Jun;12(3):226-33. doi: 10.1097/01.hjr.0000166455.23346.a5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15942420 (View on PubMed)

Dobsak P, Novakova M, Siegelova J, Fiser B, Vitovec J, Nagasaka M, Kohzuki M, Yambe T, Nitta S, Eicher JC, Wolf JE, Imachi K. Low-frequency electrical stimulation increases muscle strength and improves blood supply in patients with chronic heart failure. Circ J. 2006 Jan;70(1):75-82. doi: 10.1253/circj.70.75.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16377928 (View on PubMed)

Harris S, LeMaitre JP, Mackenzie G, Fox KA, Denvir MA. A randomised study of home-based electrical stimulation of the legs and conventional bicycle exercise training for patients with chronic heart failure. Eur Heart J. 2003 May;24(9):871-8. doi: 10.1016/s0195-668x(02)00822-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12727155 (View on PubMed)

Karavidas A, Arapi SM, Pyrgakis V, Adamopoulos S. Functional electrical stimulation of lower limbs in patients with chronic heart failure. Heart Fail Rev. 2010 Nov;15(6):563-79. doi: 10.1007/s10741-010-9171-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20490656 (View on PubMed)

Karavidas A, Driva M, Parissis JT, Farmakis D, Mantzaraki V, Varounis C, Paraskevaidis I, Ikonomidis I, Pirgakis V, Anastasiou-Nana M, Filippatos G. Functional electrical stimulation of peripheral muscles improves endothelial function and clinical and emotional status in heart failure patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction. Am Heart J. 2013 Oct;166(4):760-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2013.06.021. Epub 2013 Aug 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24093858 (View on PubMed)

Nuhr M, Crevenna R, Gohlsch B, Bittner C, Pleiner J, Wiesinger G, Fialka-Moser V, Quittan M, Pette D. Functional and biochemical properties of chronically stimulated human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003 Apr;89(2):202-8. doi: 10.1007/s00421-003-0792-8. Epub 2003 Feb 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12665986 (View on PubMed)

Quittan M, Sochor A, Wiesinger GF, Kollmitzer J, Sturm B, Pacher R, Mayr W. Strength improvement of knee extensor muscles in patients with chronic heart failure by neuromuscular electrical stimulation. Artif Organs. 1999 May;23(5):432-5. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1594.1999.06372.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10378936 (View on PubMed)

Sbruzzi G, Ribeiro RA, Schaan BD, Signori LU, Silva AM, Irigoyen MC, Plentz RD. Functional electrical stimulation in the treatment of patients with chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Jun;17(3):254-60. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328339b5a2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20560163 (View on PubMed)

Smart NA, Dieberg G, Giallauria F. Functional electrical stimulation for chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol. 2013 Jul 15;167(1):80-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2011.12.019. Epub 2012 Jan 10.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22236510 (View on PubMed)

Vaquero AF, Chicharro JL, Gil L, Ruiz MP, Sanchez V, Lucia A, Urrea S, Gomez MA. Effects of muscle electrical stimulation on peak VO2 in cardiac transplant patients. Int J Sports Med. 1998 Jul;19(5):317-22. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-971924.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9721054 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-00273

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

TENS in Optimizer(R) Patients
NCT02692690 COMPLETED PHASE4
NMES for Rehab After Surgery
NCT04784962 COMPLETED NA