Comparing 61.2 Gy Radiotherapy Dose Versus 50.4 Gy Radiotherapy Dose for Locally Advanced Esophageal Carcinoma

NCT ID: NCT03790553

Last Updated: 2023-08-03

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

646 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-15

Study Completion Date

2025-10-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determined the best definitive radiotherapy dosage for patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

50.4Gy

Total radiotherapy dose of 50.4Gy.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Different total radiotherapy dose between two arms.

61.2Gy

Total radiotherapy dose of 61.2Gy.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Radiotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

Different total radiotherapy dose between two arms.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Radiotherapy

Different total radiotherapy dose between two arms.

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Joined the study voluntarily and signed informed consent form;
* Age 18-75 years; both genders
* Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma confirmed by pathology.
* No radiotherapy, chemotherapy or other treatments prior to enrollment
* Locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (T1N1-3M0, T2-4NxM0, TxNxM1 (supraclavicular lymph node metastasis only) (AJCC 8th)
* Use of an effective contraceptive for adults to prevent pregnancy.
* No severely abnormal hematopoietic, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, or hepatic function. No immunodeficiency.
* WBC ≥ 3.5\*109/L, Hemoglobin ≥ 9 g/dL, Neutrophils ≥ 1·5\*109/L, Platelet count ≥ 100\*109/L, ALAT and ASAT \< 2·5 \* ULN, TBIL \< 1·5 \* ULN, and Creatinine \< 1·5 \*ULN.
* ECOG 0-2.
* Life expectancy of more than 3 months.
* Agreement of PET/CT accessment at 25-28 radiotherapy fraction.

Exclusion Criteria

* Total radiotherapy dose cannot reach 61.2Gy/34Fx in the condition of the nomal tissue dose complying to the standard criteria.
* Esophageal perforation, or hematemesis.
* History of radiotherapy or chemotherapy for esophageal cancer.
* History of surgery within 28 days before Day 1.
* History of prior malignancies (other than skin basal cell carcinoma or cervical carcinoma in situ with a disease-free survival of at least 3 years).
* Participation in other interventional clinical trials within 30 days.
* Pregnant or breast-feeding women or fertile patients who refused to use contraceptives.
* Drug addiction, alcoholism or AIDS.
* Uncontrolled seizures or psychiatric disorders.
* Any other condition which in the investigator's opinion would not make the patient a good candidate for the clinical trial.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Fudan University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Kuai Le Zhao, MD

Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Jiangsu Cancer Hospital

Nanjing, Jiangsu, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Huadong Hospital

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Fudan Universtiy Shanghai Cancer Center

Shanghai, Shanghai Municipality, China

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

China

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

Jinjun C Ye, M.D.

Role: primary

13585175433 ext. 13585175433

Xiangpeng Zheng, M.D.

Role: primary

8621-62483180 ext. 862162483180

Xiangpeng Zheng

Role: backup

862162483180 ext. 862162483180

Kuaile Zhao, MD.

Role: primary

+8618017312534

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Zhu H, Liu Q, Xu H, Mo M, Wang Z, Lu K, Zhou J, Chen J, Zheng X, Ye J, Ge X, Luo H, Liu Q, Deng J, Ai D, Hao S, Zhang J, Tseng IH, Song S, Chen Y, Zhao K. Dose escalation based on 18F-FDG PET/CT response in definitive chemoradiotherapy of locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: a phase III, open-label, randomized, controlled trial (ESO-Shanghai 12). Radiat Oncol. 2022 Jul 29;17(1):134. doi: 10.1186/s13014-022-02099-y.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35906623 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ESO-Shanghai 12

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.