MEDPass Trial: MedPass Versus Conventional Administration of Oral Nutritional Supplements

NCT ID: NCT03761680

Last Updated: 2023-03-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

204 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-11-22

Study Completion Date

2021-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The aim of the randomized-controlled, single-center MEDPass trial is to assess the effects of MEDPass versus conventional administration of oral nutritional supplements (ONS) on energy and protein intake in medical and geriatric inpatients.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Disease related malnutrition (DRM) in hospitalized patients is a common problem.The oral nutritional support with ONS is one of the first and most common treatment approach in the patients at nutritional risk. Treatment with ONS may reduce mortality and complications in hospitalized patients.

There are no standards on the type of administration of ONS in terms of timing throughout the day leading to individual approaches. ONS are conventionally served as snacks by nurses, nursing aids or gastronomy personnel between the main meals. The MEDPass-mode offers a different approach by serving ONS together with the medication, three or four times per day, in unusually small portions. Preliminary trials suggest that compliance and cost effectiveness may be improved with the MEDPass-mode.

Enhancing compliance to ONS may not consequently lead to improved total energy and protein intake throughout the day. There has never been a large trial in which total energy- and protein intake of the subjects was studied consequently and systematically throughout the hospitalization. Therefore, this trial will bridge this gap by studying total energy- and protein intake as primary outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Malnutrition

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomized, controlled, open-label, clinical trial
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

MEDPass Group

Allocation of ONS in the MEDPass mode

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

MEDPass mode of administration

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Allocation of 50 ml of ONS four times per day distributed with the medication rounds

Control Group

Patients receive ONS between meals or at their request as usual

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control Intervention

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Patients receive ONS between meals or at their request as usual

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

MEDPass mode of administration

Allocation of 50 ml of ONS four times per day distributed with the medication rounds

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Control Intervention

Patients receive ONS between meals or at their request as usual

Intervention Type DIETARY_SUPPLEMENT

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Nutritional risk screening (NRS-2002) total score ≥3 points according to routine screening at admission within 72 hours
* Expected hospital LOS ≥3 days after screening (as estimated by the treating physician)
* Patient qualifies for ONS and approves prescription
* Age \>18 years
* Willingness and ability to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Initially admitted to critical care unit
* Immediate post-operative phase (\<7 days post-surgery)
* Dysphagia with the inability to swallow liquids
* Supplemental enteral and/or parenteral nutrition
* Admitted with, or scheduled for, total parenteral nutrition or tube feeding
* Mini Mental State examination \< 16 points
* hospitalized due to anorexia nervosa
* hospitalized due to acute pancreatitis
* hospitalized due to acute liver failure
* cystic fibrosis
* patients after gastric bypass surgery
* patients with short bowel syndrome
* terminal condition (end of life situation)
* poor skills in German language (study language)
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bern University of Applied Sciences

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Zeno Stanga, Prof.Dr.med.

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Insel Gruppe AG, University Hospital Bern

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital Inselspital, Berne, Facility Tiefenau

Bern, Canton of Bern, Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kurmann S, Reber E, Schonenberger KA, Schuetz P, Uhlmann K, Vasiloglou MF, Schoenenberger AW, Bertschi D, Sterchi AB, Stanga Z. MEDPass versus conventional administration of oral nutritional supplements - A randomized controlled trial comparing coverage of energy and protein requirements. Clin Nutr. 2023 Feb;42(2):108-115. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2022.11.015. Epub 2022 Dec 5.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36525797 (View on PubMed)

Kurmann S, Reber E, Vasiloglou MF, Schuetz P, Schoenenberger AW, Uhlmann K, Sterchi AB, Stanga Z. Energy and protein intake in medical and geriatric inpatients with MEDPass versus conventional administration of oral nutritional supplements: study protocol for the randomized controlled MEDPass Trial. Trials. 2021 Mar 16;22(1):210. doi: 10.1186/s13063-021-05145-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 33726841 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

3804

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.