Clinical and Economical Evaluation of Colorectal Surgery in Ambulatory Care

NCT ID: NCT03760939

Last Updated: 2025-05-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

5 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-03

Study Completion Date

2024-11-15

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) significantly decreases mortality, morbidity and hospital length of stay without increasing the rate of re-hospitalization. It reduces psychologic stress caused by surgery and decreases postoperative complications about 50 %, especially in colorectal surgery. ERAS is now the object of several Good Practices Recommendations and is about to become the reference strategy.

The development of ambulatory surgery is a French national concern. Its interest has been demonstrated in many surgical fields. It requires a reflection centered on the patient and a health care pathway organization involving all health care actors.

While hospitalization is still the standard practice for colonic surgery, the objective of this study is to evaluate the medical and economic impact of an ambulatory care for colorectal surgery.

Ambulatory care will be compared to standard hospitalization of patients who benefit from the ERAS program.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) significantly decreases mortality, morbidity and hospital length of stay without increasing the rate of re-hospitalization. It reduces psychologic stress caused by surgery and decreases postoperative complications about 50 %, especially in colorectal surgery. ERAS is now the object of several Good Practices Recommendations and is about to become the reference strategy.

The development of ambulatory surgery is a French national concern. Its interest has been demonstrated in many surgical fields. It requires a reflection centered on the patient and a health care pathway organization involving all health care actors. Multiple interests have been shown:

* Equivalent mortality and/or morbidity compared with standard hospitalizations
* Medical and psychological benefits
* Individualized and less invasive health care pathways, in favor of patient's autonomy
* Multidisciplinary approach and innovative care
* Heath care costs management (decrease of hospital length of stay, optimization of operating rooms).

Ambulatory colectomies feasibility is recognized since 2013-2014 in France (Dr. Gignoux, MD in Lyon and Dr. Chasserant, MD in Le Havre). These ambulatory procedures are implemented in few expert centers with significant experience (more than 100 patients in Le Havre and more than 85 patients in Lyon) but several human and organizational limitations slow this innovative care.

The risk of complications does not seem to be increased on condition of anticipate and provide a postoperative follow-up at home.

While hospitalization is still the standard practice for colonic surgery, the objective of this study is to evaluate the medical and economic impact of an ambulatory care for colorectal surgery.

Ambulatory care will be compared to standard hospitalization of patients who benefit from the ERAS program.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Colorectal Surgery

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NON_RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Ambulatory care

Colorectal surgery in ambulatory care

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Clinical and economical evaluation

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the clinical and the economical impact of a colorectal surgery

Standard hospitalization

Colorectal surgery with standard hospitalization for retrospective patients who benefit from the ERAS program, selected by statistical matching.

Group Type OTHER

Clinical and economical evaluation

Intervention Type OTHER

Evaluation of the clinical and the economical impact of a colorectal surgery

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Clinical and economical evaluation

Evaluation of the clinical and the economical impact of a colorectal surgery

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male or female over 18 years old
* Patient able to understand the objectives and risks related to the trial
* Patient able to give written informed consent
* Patient able to understand and accept the health care program
* Isolated colonic lesion located on the colon or the upper rectum
* Any neoplastic or non-neoplastic colonic pathology
* Colonic surgery except resection without continuity interruption (e.g. low cecum resection, partial colectomy, suture for polyp)
* Moderate and/or controlled comorbidities
* No history of multiple laparotomies
* No psychosocial distress
* No living alone patient
* Patient registered with the French social security

Exclusion Criteria

* Patient in exclusion period of another clinical study
* Emergency surgical procedure
* Type 1 diabetes
* Presence of an uncontrolled preoperative anemia
* Effective anticoagulation treatment, impossible to suspend
* Kidney failure (treated by dialysis)
* Hepatic cirrhosis
* Patient refusal
* Patient in custody
* Patient under guardianship
* Pregnancy
* Breastfeeding
* Poor general condition
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

IHU Strasbourg

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Didier Mutter, MD, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Service Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne, Nouvel Hôpital Civil de Strasbourg

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Service de Chirurgie Digestive et Endocrinienne - Nouvel Hôpital Civil

Strasbourg, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Gignoux B, Pasquer A, Vulliez A, Lanz T. Outpatient colectomy within an enhanced recovery program. J Visc Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1):11-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2014.12.004. Epub 2015 Feb 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25661787 (View on PubMed)

Chasserant P, Gosgnach M. Improvement of peri-operative patient management to enable outpatient colectomy. J Visc Surg. 2016 Nov;153(5):333-337. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.07.006. Epub 2016 Sep 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27671006 (View on PubMed)

Slim K; Groupe GRACE (Groupe francophone de rehabilitation amelioree apres chirurgie); Amalberti R. Ambulatory colectomy: no innovation without evaluation. J Visc Surg. 2015 Feb;152(1):1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2015.01.001. Epub 2015 Jan 31. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 25650365 (View on PubMed)

Wind J, Polle SW, Fung Kon Jin PH, Dejong CH, von Meyenfeldt MF, Ubbink DT, Gouma DJ, Bemelman WA; Laparoscopy and/or Fast Track Multimodal Management Versus Standard Care (LAFA) Study Group; Enhanced Recovery after Surgery (ERAS) Group. Systematic review of enhanced recovery programmes in colonic surgery. Br J Surg. 2006 Jul;93(7):800-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.5384.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16775831 (View on PubMed)

Walter CJ, Collin J, Dumville JC, Drew PJ, Monson JR. Enhanced recovery in colorectal resections: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Colorectal Dis. 2009 May;11(4):344-53. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2009.01789.x. Epub 2009 Feb 4.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19207699 (View on PubMed)

Gouvas N, Tan E, Windsor A, Xynos E, Tekkis PP. Fast-track vs standard care in colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis update. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2009 Oct;24(10):1119-31. doi: 10.1007/s00384-009-0703-5. Epub 2009 May 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19415308 (View on PubMed)

Varadhan KK, Neal KR, Dejong CH, Fearon KC, Ljungqvist O, Lobo DN. The enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway for patients undergoing major elective open colorectal surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Clin Nutr. 2010 Aug;29(4):434-40. doi: 10.1016/j.clnu.2010.01.004. Epub 2010 Jan 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20116145 (View on PubMed)

Adamina M, Kehlet H, Tomlinson GA, Senagore AJ, Delaney CP. Enhanced recovery pathways optimize health outcomes and resource utilization: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in colorectal surgery. Surgery. 2011 Jun;149(6):830-40. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2010.11.003. Epub 2011 Jan 14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21236454 (View on PubMed)

Spanjersberg WR, Reurings J, Keus F, van Laarhoven CJ. Fast track surgery versus conventional recovery strategies for colorectal surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Feb 16;(2):CD007635. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007635.pub2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21328298 (View on PubMed)

Slim K, Delaunay L, Joris J, Leonard D, Raspado O, Chambrier C, Ostermann S; Le Groupe francophone de rehabilitation amelioree apres chirurgie (GRACE). How to implement an enhanced recovery program? Proposals from the Francophone Group for enhanced recovery after surgery (GRACE). J Visc Surg. 2016 Dec;153(6S):S45-S49. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.05.008. Epub 2016 Jun 14. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27316295 (View on PubMed)

Gustafsson UO, Oppelstrup H, Thorell A, Nygren J, Ljungqvist O. Adherence to the ERAS protocol is Associated with 5-Year Survival After Colorectal Cancer Surgery: A Retrospective Cohort Study. World J Surg. 2016 Jul;40(7):1741-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3460-y.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26913728 (View on PubMed)

Lawrence JK, Keller DS, Samia H, Ermlich B, Brady KM, Nobel T, Stein SL, Delaney CP. Discharge within 24 to 72 hours of colorectal surgery is associated with low readmission rates when using Enhanced Recovery Pathways. J Am Coll Surg. 2013 Mar;216(3):390-4. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2012.12.014. Epub 2013 Jan 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23352608 (View on PubMed)

Bardram L, Funch-Jensen P, Jensen P, Crawford ME, Kehlet H. Recovery after laparoscopic colonic surgery with epidural analgesia, and early oral nutrition and mobilisation. Lancet. 1995 Mar 25;345(8952):763-4. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90643-6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 7891489 (View on PubMed)

Levy BF, Scott MJ, Fawcett WJ, Rockall TA. 23-hour-stay laparoscopic colectomy. Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jul;52(7):1239-43. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e3181a0b32d.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19571699 (View on PubMed)

Gash KJ, Goede AC, Chambers W, Greenslade GL, Dixon AR. Laparoendoscopic single-site surgery is feasible in complex colorectal resections and could enable day case colectomy. Surg Endosc. 2011 Mar;25(3):835-40. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1275-8. Epub 2010 Aug 24.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20734083 (View on PubMed)

Rogers JP, Dobradin A, Kar PM, Alam SE. Overnight hospital stay after colon surgery for adenocarcinoma. JSLS. 2012 Apr-Jun;16(2):333-6. doi: 10.4293/108680812x13427982376789.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23477191 (View on PubMed)

Dobradin A, Ganji M, Alam SE, Kar PM. Laparoscopic colon resections with discharge less than 24 hours. JSLS. 2013 Apr-Jun;17(2):198-203. doi: 10.4293/108680813X13654754535791.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23925012 (View on PubMed)

Martin-Ferrero MA, Faour-Martin O, Simon-Perez C, Perez-Herrero M, de Pedro-Moro JA. Ambulatory surgery in orthopedics: experience of over 10,000 patients. J Orthop Sci. 2014 Mar;19(2):332-338. doi: 10.1007/s00776-013-0501-3. Epub 2014 Jan 7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24395115 (View on PubMed)

Verrier JF, Paget C, Perlier F, Demesmay F. How to introduce a program of Enhanced Recovery after Surgery? The experience of the CAPIO group. J Visc Surg. 2016 Dec;153(6S):S33-S39. doi: 10.1016/j.jviscsurg.2016.10.001. Epub 2016 Nov 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 27863944 (View on PubMed)

Daams F, Wu Z, Lahaye MJ, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Prediction and diagnosis of colorectal anastomotic leakage: A systematic review of literature. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2014 Feb 27;6(2):14-26. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v6.i2.14.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 24600507 (View on PubMed)

Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15273542 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18-001

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.