Radius Fracture Anesthesia and Rehabilitation (RADAR)

NCT ID: NCT03749174

Last Updated: 2022-10-27

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-09-03

Study Completion Date

2022-06-20

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Distal fracture of the radial bone is the commonest fracture and is also connected to osteoporosis. Normally the operation is performed under neuroaxial blockade and sedation. When the blockade rapidly vanish many patients experience a rebound pain much severer that than the actual trauma pain. If long acting local anesthetics are used this will occur during night time and many patients will go to the emergency room for pain treatment. Short acting local anesthetics may make it possible to treat patients pain in-house prior to leaving the hospital. In this study

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This investigation is a joint study involving Occupational Therapist, Orthopedic surgeons and Anesthesiologist. Distal fracture of the radial bone is the commonest fracture, mainly in elder females with osteoporosis and also obesity. Normally 75% of patients are treated with plaster after fracture repositioning. The remaining 25% are operated upon. Routinely, the operation is performed under neuroaxial blockade and sedation. When the blockade rapidly vanish many patients experience a rebound pain much severer than the initial trauma pain. If long acting local anesthetics are used the blockade will be terminated during night and many patients will go to the Emergency room for pain treatment. Short acting local anesthetics may make it possible to treat patients pain in-house prior to hospital discharge and thus reduce severe rebound pain.

In this study patients with radial fractures are included and operated upon by a standard surgical operation with plate and screws. They will receive either 1) ultra sound guided supraclavicular block long-acting (n=30) local anesthetic , 2) ultra sound guided supraclavicular block short-acing (n=60) local anesthetics or 3) general anesthesia (n=30) to provide analgesia during the operational procedure. Patients given an ultra sound guided blockade with short-acting local anesthetic (n=60) are further sub-divided into receiving either postoperative plaster/cast (n=30) or an orthosis/brace (n=30).

Patients pain will be measured by Numeric Rating scale (0 = no pain and 10 worst possible pain) during the first 7 postoperative days. The opioid consumption will be noted by personal contact intermittently by telephone and by a pain diary until day 7. Both parametric and none-parametric analysis will be conducted.

Quality of recovery will be assessed by Quality of Recovery Scale 15 at 5 occasions. Adverse effects and unplanned health care contacts will also be gathered.

After 3 days the Occupational Therapist will control the patients followed by investigations at 2, 6 12 and 52 weeks. The patients will be graded the Patient rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) and Michigan Outcomes Questionnaire (MHQ) Edema will be measured and strength will be measured by Jamar dynamometer, Finally, Sense of coherence will be measured by KASAM-13

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Radial Fracture

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

FACTORIAL

Patients are subdivided into 3 groups where one group is further subdivided into 2 groups
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Long acting anesthetic block/plaster

Intervention 1: Blockade will be given supraclavicularly with Long acting local Anesthetic (n=30) combined with post operative plaster immobilization.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Long acting Supraclivicular block vs Short acting Supraclavicular block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are randomized to receive; long-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or short-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or general anesthesia

Sub group randomized to plaster/cast or orthosis/brace, both having short-acting block

Short acting anesthetic block/plaster

Intervention 2: Blockade will be given supraclavicularly with Short acting local anesthetic (n=30) combined with plaster immobilisation postoperatively

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Long acting Supraclivicular block vs Short acting Supraclavicular block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are randomized to receive; long-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or short-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or general anesthesia

Sub group randomized to plaster/cast or orthosis/brace, both having short-acting block

Short acting anesthetic block/orthotic

Intervention 3: Blockade will be given supraclavicularly with Short acting local anesthetic (n=30) and combined with orthosis for postoperative immobilisation

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Long acting Supraclivicular block vs Short acting Supraclavicular block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are randomized to receive; long-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or short-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or general anesthesia

Sub group randomized to plaster/cast or orthosis/brace, both having short-acting block

General Anesthesia and plaster

Intervention 4: General anesthesia wil be administered for surgical procedure combined with postoperative plaster immobilisation (n=30),

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Long acting Supraclivicular block vs Short acting Supraclavicular block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Patients are randomized to receive; long-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or short-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or general anesthesia

Sub group randomized to plaster/cast or orthosis/brace, both having short-acting block

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Long acting Supraclivicular block vs Short acting Supraclavicular block

Patients are randomized to receive; long-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or short-acting Supraclavicular plexus block or general anesthesia

Sub group randomized to plaster/cast or orthosis/brace, both having short-acting block

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Long acting anesthetic block/plaster Short acting anesthetic block/plaster Short acting anesthetic block/orthosis General Anesthesia and plaster

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Understands native language
* Cognitive intact
* Fracture types AO 23..A and AO 23.C.1
* Operated within 18 days from initial trauma

* High energy trauma
* Ligament injury
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Sahlgrenska University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Bengt Nellgård

Associate professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bengt Nellgard, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Göteborg University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

SahlgrenskaUH

Mölndal, VGR, Sweden

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Sweden

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Galos DK, Taormina DP, Crespo A, Ding DY, Sapienza A, Jain S, Tejwani NC. Does Brachial Plexus Blockade Result in Improved Pain Scores After Distal Radius Fracture Fixation? A Randomized Trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2016 May;474(5):1247-54. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4735-1. Epub 2016 Feb 11.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26869374 (View on PubMed)

Sellbrant I, Karlsson J, Jakobsson JG, Nellgard B. Supraclavicular block with Mepivacaine vs Ropivacaine, their impact on postoperative pain: a prospective randomised study. BMC Anesthesiol. 2021 Nov 9;21(1):273. doi: 10.1186/s12871-021-01499-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34753423 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

RADAR

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Hematoma Block Versus Bier Block for Closed Fracture Reduction
NCT05086224 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING EARLY_PHASE1