Paper- vs Digital Application-based Exercises to Support Rehabilitation After Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius Fracture
NCT ID: NCT06005857
Last Updated: 2024-04-23
Study Results
Results pending
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
Recruitment Status
RECRUITING
Clinical Phase
NA
Total Enrollment
40 participants
Study Classification
INTERVENTIONAL
Study Start Date
2024-01-23
Study Completion Date
2025-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The aim of this study is to evaluate the difference between the use of paper- versus application-based (smartphone application) exercises in the rehabilitation of intra-articular fractures of the distal radius at the Cantonal Hospital of Fribourg, Switzerland.
The operation itself will proceed as usual. However, the rehabilitation will be aided by exercises based either on a paper support or on a digital application (smartphone application), in addition to follow-up by a hand therapist.
The aim is to determine which support provides the best improvement in wrist mobility and function, and to speed up the return to work.
The operation itself will proceed as usual. However, the rehabilitation will be aided by exercises based either on a paper support or on a digital application (smartphone application), in addition to follow-up by a hand therapist.
The aim is to determine which support provides the best improvement in wrist mobility and function, and to speed up the return to work.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Comparison of Occupational Therapy and Home Exercises for Adults With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures
NCT00438750
Distal Radius Fractures
COMPLETED
NA
Early Mobilization After Volar Plate Osteosynthesis of Distal Radius Fractures
NCT01576224
Distal Radius Fracture
COMPLETED
NA
Early Motion After Volar Fixation for Distal Radius Fractures
NCT00955734
Radius Fracture
COMPLETED
NA
Non-operative Treatment Versus Volar Locking Plate in Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Patients Over 65 Years
NCT02879656
Distal Radius Fracture
COMPLETED
NA
Prospective Randomized Comparison of Conservative and Opertaive Treatment of Radius Fractures in Elderly Patients
NCT04655768
Orthopedic Disorder
UNKNOWN
NA
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The aims of this study are:
1. To measure range of motion (flexion and extension) of the wrist in usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of a digital application-based home exercise program compared with usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of paper-based (standard) home exercice program.
2. To measure the following variables in usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of a digital application-based home exercise program compared with usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of paper-based (standard) home exercice program:
* Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score
* Return to work
* Retorn to leisure
* Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
* Distal radio-ulnar joint stability
* Grip strength
* Key pinch strength
* Tripod pinch strength
* Fracture healing
* Fracture displacement
* Patient satisfaction with exercise support
* Patient participation in rehabilitation
Co-primary endpoint: range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, i.e. measured in degrees in flexion and extension.
Secondary endpoints:
* Clinical scores Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score is to be completed by the patient himself, validated in French and in German. Pain score is measured by 5 items and function is measured by 10 items. The total score is based on 100 points. The best score is 0 and the worst score is 100.
* Partial sick-leave stoppage
* Total sick-leave stoppage
* Return to principal leisure
* Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
* Distal radio-ulnar joint stability (compared with the healthy side)
* Grip strength (Hydraulic hand dynamometer JAMAR®), i.e. measured in kilograms
* Key pinch strength (B\&L Engineering® Pinch Gauge), i.e. measured in kilograms
* Tripod pinch strength (B\&L Engineering® Pinch Gauge), i.e. measured in kilograms
* Fracture healing
* Fracture displacement
* Patient satisfaction with exercise support
* Patient participation in rehabilitation
This research is a national, interdisciplinary, prospective, single-blind (investigator), parallel-group (experimental study, level of evidence I), monocentric (conducted at the HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal) study.
All patients will undergo the same operative procedure. Upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be placed in supine position, the injured limb resting on a hand table. Standard anesthetic axillary nerve will be applied. All the operation will do by an experienced hand surgeon having minimum 5 years of post-specialization clinical experience. A standard modified Henry approach will be done. The DRF will be reduced and fixed with a palmar plate (Aptus Adaptive II, Medartis®). The stability of the distal radio ulnar joint (DRUJ) will be tested after the radius fixation. If the DRUJ will be instable, the ulnar styloid fracture will be fixed (osteo suture (PDS wire) or screw fixation (Aptus CCS 1.7/2.2, Medartis®).
The study participants will be allocated (randomization) to either Group 1 (standard hand therapy + home smartphone application-based exercises) or Group 2 (standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises). The two groups will be matched as good as possible in terms of total numbers of participants per group, age (18-40 years or 41-65 years) and type of work (non-manual work or manual work) in order to minimize any possible bias due to structural differences in both groups.
All patients will undergo the same postoperative splint immobilization (removable palmar custom splint) for 6 weeks.
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a standard hand therapy program + smartphone application-based exercises or a standard hand therapy program + paper-based exercises. The follow-up will consist of a one-to-one therapy session per week durung 12 for monitoring, i.e. range of motion, swelling, scar, eventual adverse event, and the way of practicing exercises. In-person sessions will be supervised by a therapist involved in the study, who is certified in hand rehabilitation. Moreover, each patient is expected to practice by himself a daily home exercises program consisting of mobilization of the (i) thumb and (ii) long fingers in flexion-extension and mobilization of the (iii) wrist in flexion-extension, radio-ulnar inclination and pro-supination. Each exercise will be performed in 3 sets of 15 repetitions, 5 times a day. Strengthening exercises (iv) will be added from the sixth week post-surgery. Each training session will last around 15 minutes, and be repeated after a three-hours break. They are standard exercises used in the treatment of DRF and validated by several guidelines. If necessary, the treatment will be pursued after 12 weeks.
Each patient will be asked to fill in a paper daily diary on the number of exercises performed (number of repetitions actually performed per set requested, how many times per day). They will also be asked to fill in the level of pain felt at that time. A satisfaction questionnaire will be completed at the end of the treatment concerning the support (digital vs paper) used.
At 6 and 12 weeks, the blinded surgeon (not aware of the therapy the patient is undergoing) will research any clinical or radiological adverse events.
At 6 and 12 weeks, a blinded independent observer (not aware of the therapy the patient is undergoing) will measure the values required to achieve the aims 1 and 2.
Aim 1 :
An independent observer who is not the surgeon will measure, at 6 and 12 weeks, range of motion (flexion and extension) of patients of both groups (Group 1, with standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises; Group 2, with standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises) with photography (Figure 11) and with a goniometer.
Aim 2 :
Patients of both groups (Group 1, with standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises; Group 2, with standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises), the following variables will be measured:
* Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
* Return to work
* Retorn to leisure
* Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
* Distal radio-ulnar joint stability
* Grip strength
* Key pinch strength
* Tripod pinch strength
* Fracture healing
* Fracture displacement
* Patient satisfaction with exercise support
* Patient participation in rehabilitation
1. To measure range of motion (flexion and extension) of the wrist in usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of a digital application-based home exercise program compared with usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of paper-based (standard) home exercice program.
2. To measure the following variables in usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of a digital application-based home exercise program compared with usual post-operative hand therapy sustained by the use of paper-based (standard) home exercice program:
* Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation score
* Return to work
* Retorn to leisure
* Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
* Distal radio-ulnar joint stability
* Grip strength
* Key pinch strength
* Tripod pinch strength
* Fracture healing
* Fracture displacement
* Patient satisfaction with exercise support
* Patient participation in rehabilitation
Co-primary endpoint: range of motion (ROM) of the wrist, i.e. measured in degrees in flexion and extension.
Secondary endpoints:
* Clinical scores Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE). The Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score is to be completed by the patient himself, validated in French and in German. Pain score is measured by 5 items and function is measured by 10 items. The total score is based on 100 points. The best score is 0 and the worst score is 100.
* Partial sick-leave stoppage
* Total sick-leave stoppage
* Return to principal leisure
* Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
* Distal radio-ulnar joint stability (compared with the healthy side)
* Grip strength (Hydraulic hand dynamometer JAMAR®), i.e. measured in kilograms
* Key pinch strength (B\&L Engineering® Pinch Gauge), i.e. measured in kilograms
* Tripod pinch strength (B\&L Engineering® Pinch Gauge), i.e. measured in kilograms
* Fracture healing
* Fracture displacement
* Patient satisfaction with exercise support
* Patient participation in rehabilitation
This research is a national, interdisciplinary, prospective, single-blind (investigator), parallel-group (experimental study, level of evidence I), monocentric (conducted at the HFR Fribourg - Hôpital cantonal) study.
All patients will undergo the same operative procedure. Upon arrival to the operating room, patients will be placed in supine position, the injured limb resting on a hand table. Standard anesthetic axillary nerve will be applied. All the operation will do by an experienced hand surgeon having minimum 5 years of post-specialization clinical experience. A standard modified Henry approach will be done. The DRF will be reduced and fixed with a palmar plate (Aptus Adaptive II, Medartis®). The stability of the distal radio ulnar joint (DRUJ) will be tested after the radius fixation. If the DRUJ will be instable, the ulnar styloid fracture will be fixed (osteo suture (PDS wire) or screw fixation (Aptus CCS 1.7/2.2, Medartis®).
The study participants will be allocated (randomization) to either Group 1 (standard hand therapy + home smartphone application-based exercises) or Group 2 (standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises). The two groups will be matched as good as possible in terms of total numbers of participants per group, age (18-40 years or 41-65 years) and type of work (non-manual work or manual work) in order to minimize any possible bias due to structural differences in both groups.
All patients will undergo the same postoperative splint immobilization (removable palmar custom splint) for 6 weeks.
Patients will be randomly assigned to receive either a standard hand therapy program + smartphone application-based exercises or a standard hand therapy program + paper-based exercises. The follow-up will consist of a one-to-one therapy session per week durung 12 for monitoring, i.e. range of motion, swelling, scar, eventual adverse event, and the way of practicing exercises. In-person sessions will be supervised by a therapist involved in the study, who is certified in hand rehabilitation. Moreover, each patient is expected to practice by himself a daily home exercises program consisting of mobilization of the (i) thumb and (ii) long fingers in flexion-extension and mobilization of the (iii) wrist in flexion-extension, radio-ulnar inclination and pro-supination. Each exercise will be performed in 3 sets of 15 repetitions, 5 times a day. Strengthening exercises (iv) will be added from the sixth week post-surgery. Each training session will last around 15 minutes, and be repeated after a three-hours break. They are standard exercises used in the treatment of DRF and validated by several guidelines. If necessary, the treatment will be pursued after 12 weeks.
Each patient will be asked to fill in a paper daily diary on the number of exercises performed (number of repetitions actually performed per set requested, how many times per day). They will also be asked to fill in the level of pain felt at that time. A satisfaction questionnaire will be completed at the end of the treatment concerning the support (digital vs paper) used.
At 6 and 12 weeks, the blinded surgeon (not aware of the therapy the patient is undergoing) will research any clinical or radiological adverse events.
At 6 and 12 weeks, a blinded independent observer (not aware of the therapy the patient is undergoing) will measure the values required to achieve the aims 1 and 2.
Aim 1 :
An independent observer who is not the surgeon will measure, at 6 and 12 weeks, range of motion (flexion and extension) of patients of both groups (Group 1, with standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises; Group 2, with standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises) with photography (Figure 11) and with a goniometer.
Aim 2 :
Patients of both groups (Group 1, with standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises; Group 2, with standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises), the following variables will be measured:
* Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE)
* Return to work
* Retorn to leisure
* Range of motion in pronation and supination, in radial deviation and ulnar deviation
* Distal radio-ulnar joint stability
* Grip strength
* Key pinch strength
* Tripod pinch strength
* Fracture healing
* Fracture displacement
* Patient satisfaction with exercise support
* Patient participation in rehabilitation
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Distal Radius Fracture
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
Allocation Method
RANDOMIZED
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Primary Study Purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Blinding Strategy
SINGLE
Outcome Assessors
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
The group will receive standard hand therapy program + rehabilitation program sustained by the use of a digital application.
Group Type
EXPERIMENTAL
Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises
Intervention Type
OTHER
Standard post-operative hand rehabilitation and home digital application-based exercises
Control group
The control group will receive a standard hand therapy program + paper-based (standard) rehabilitation program.
Group Type
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR
standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises
Intervention Type
OTHER
Standard post-operative hand rehabilitation and home paper-based exercises
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Standard hand therapy + home digital application-based exercises
Standard post-operative hand rehabilitation and home digital application-based exercises
Intervention Type
OTHER
standard hand therapy + home paper-based exercises
Standard post-operative hand rehabilitation and home paper-based exercises
Intervention Type
OTHER
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Complete intra-articular DRF (classification AO 23 C1, C2 or C3)
* Simple palmar operative approach
* Simple palmar plate fixation
* Age 18-65 years
* Worker
* Own either a smartphone or other wireless device
* Consent form signed
* French or German speaker
* Simple palmar operative approach
* Simple palmar plate fixation
* Age 18-65 years
* Worker
* Own either a smartphone or other wireless device
* Consent form signed
* French or German speaker
Exclusion Criteria
* Extra-articular or partial-articular DRF
* Double/triple operative approaches needed
* Bilateral procedure
* Fracture aged than more of 2 weeks
* Patient refusal/no informed consent
* Inability to give informed consent
* Previous wrist injury or surgery
* Rheumatoid polyarthritis
* Double/triple operative approaches needed
* Bilateral procedure
* Fracture aged than more of 2 weeks
* Patient refusal/no informed consent
* Inability to give informed consent
* Previous wrist injury or surgery
* Rheumatoid polyarthritis
Minimum Eligible Age
18 Years
Maximum Eligible Age
65 Years
Eligible Sex
ALL
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Hôpital Fribourgeois
OTHER
Sponsor Role
lead
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Estoppey Daniel
Principal Investigator
Responsibility Role
PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Thomas TM Mészaros, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
HFR Fribourg, Hôpital Cantonal
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
HFR Fribourg
Fribourg, , Switzerland
Site Status
RECRUITING
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Switzerland
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Lu C, Hu Y, Xie J, Fu Q, Leigh I, Governor S, Wang G. The Use of Mobile Health Applications to Improve Patient Experience: Cross-Sectional Study in Chinese Public Hospitals. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2018 May 23;6(5):e126. doi: 10.2196/mhealth.9145.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Valdes K, Gendernalik E, Hauser J, Tipton M. Use of mobile applications in hand therapy. J Hand Ther. 2020 Apr-Jun;33(2):229-234. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2019.10.003. Epub 2020 Apr 3.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Murfin M. Know your apps: an evidence-based approach to evaluation of mobile clinical applications. J Physician Assist Educ. 2013;24(3):38-40. doi: 10.1097/01367895-201324030-00008.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wallace S, Clark M, White J. 'It's on my iPhone': attitudes to the use of mobile computing devices in medical education, a mixed-methods study. BMJ Open. 2012 Aug 24;2(4):e001099. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2012-001099. Print 2012.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Lyngcoln A, Taylor N, Pizzari T, Baskus K. The relationship between adherence to hand therapy and short-term outcome after distal radius fracture. J Hand Ther. 2005 Jan-Mar;18(1):2-8; quiz 9. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2004.10.008.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Wakefield AE, McQueen MM. The role of physiotherapy and clinical predictors of outcome after fracture of the distal radius. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2000 Sep;82(7):972-6. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.82b7.10377.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Brehmer JL, Husband JB. Accelerated rehabilitation compared with a standard protocol after distal radial fractures treated with volar open reduction and internal fixation: a prospective, randomized, controlled study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 1;96(19):1621-30. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.M.00860.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Kay S, McMahon M, Stiller K. An advice and exercise program has some benefits over natural recovery after distal radius fracture: a randomised trial. Aust J Physiother. 2008;54(4):253-9. doi: 10.1016/s0004-9514(08)70004-7.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Christensen OM, Kunov A, Hansen FF, Christiansen TC, Krasheninnikoff M. Occupational therapy and Colles' fractures. Int Orthop. 2001;25(1):43-5. doi: 10.1007/s002640000183.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Ezzat A, Baliga S, Carnegie C, Johnstone A. Volar locking plate fixation for distal radius fractures: Does age affect outcome? J Orthop. 2016 Feb 22;13(2):76-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2016.01.001. eCollection 2016 Jun.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Mattila VM, Huttunen TT, Sillanpaa P, Niemi S, Pihlajamaki H, Kannus P. Significant change in the surgical treatment of distal radius fractures: a nationwide study between 1998 and 2008 in Finland. J Trauma. 2011 Oct;71(4):939-42; discussion 942-3. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e3182231af9.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Al Khudairy A, Hirpara KM, Kelly IP, Quinlan JF. Conservative treatment of the distal radius fracture using thermoplastic splint: pilot study results. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2013 Aug;23(6):647-50. doi: 10.1007/s00590-012-1042-8. Epub 2012 Jul 14.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Jerrhag D, Englund M, Karlsson MK, Rosengren BE. Epidemiology and time trends of distal forearm fractures in adults - a study of 11.2 million person-years in Sweden. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017 Jun 2;18(1):240. doi: 10.1186/s12891-017-1596-z.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Court-Brown CM, Caesar B. Epidemiology of adult fractures: A review. Injury. 2006 Aug;37(8):691-7. doi: 10.1016/j.injury.2006.04.130. Epub 2006 Jun 30.
Reference Type
BACKGROUND
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PhysiAppHFR
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.
Rehabilitation Following Displaced Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT05302089
COMPLETED
NA
Novel Exercises to Facilitate Recovery of Supination and Pronation for Distal Radius Fractures Managed With a Volar Plate
NCT05850325
UNKNOWN
NA
Conservative Treatment of Distal Radius Fracture in Elderly in Randomized Controlled Trial
NCT02894983
COMPLETED
NA
Reducing Range of Motion Deficits Post Radial Fracture
NCT01262807
COMPLETED
NA
Supervised vs. Home-Based vs. No Therapy for Uncomplicated Distal Radius Fracture in Younger Adults
NCT06913894
RECRUITING
NA
Physiotherapy vs Telerehabilitation After Volar Plating of Distal Radius Fracture
NCT06365710
RECRUITING
NA
Repair vs Non-repair of the Pronator Quadratus Muscle in Distal Radius Fractures. RCT.
NCT02348437
COMPLETED
NA
Comparison of Early and Late Therapy for Adults With Operatively Treated Distal Radius Fractures
NCT00438308
COMPLETED
Comparison of Rehabilitation Intervention, Supported by Telemedicine, With Standard Rehabilitation After Distal Radius Fracture.
NCT05463653
UNKNOWN
NA
Intraarticular Distal Radius Fractures, X-fix or Volar Fixation
NCT01035359
COMPLETED
NA
Corrective Osteotomy of the Distal Radius Without Bone Grafting
NCT05690477
COMPLETED
No Reduction Compared to Closed Reduction for Distal Radius Fractures in Patients Over 65 or Older
NCT07042139
RECRUITING
NA
Proprioception and Multi Sensory Training After DRF
NCT04820114
UNKNOWN
NA
Early Strengthening Rehabilitation Training for Post-operative Fracture Distal Radius
NCT06931418
RECRUITING
NA
Range of Motion and Patients With Distal Radius Fractures
NCT00816998
COMPLETED
NA
Nonoperative Treatment of Dorsally Dislocated Distal Radius Fractures in Adults With an Individualized 3D Printed Brace.
NCT03848702
COMPLETED
NA
Cost-effectiveness, Volar Locking Plate or Non-operative Treatment Distal Radius Fracture
NCT06067074
UNKNOWN
NA
Cast vs. Splints for Minimally Displaced Distal Radius Fractures in the Elderly
NCT02066857
COMPLETED
NA
Extraarticular Distal Radius Fractures, X-fix or Volar Fixation
NCT01034943
COMPLETED
NA
Distal Radial Fractures in the Late Middle Aged
NCT02353338
COMPLETED
NA
Distal Radius Fracture - Treatment Comparison
NCT01883063
TERMINATED
NA
Comparison of Early and Late Therapy for Adults With Non-Operatively Treated Proximal Humerus Fractures
NCT00438633
COMPLETED
Distraction Osteogenesis for Distal Radius Fractures vs. Volar Plating
NCT03635060
COMPLETED
NA
Use and Meaning of Wrist Orthosis After Distal Radius Fracture
NCT06942546
COMPLETED
Feasibility of the PERformance Guided Fracture Rehablitation Method-protocol
NCT05390463
COMPLETED