Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care Experiment

NCT ID: NCT03746756

Last Updated: 2024-07-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

266 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2017-10-01

Study Completion Date

2022-02-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

National data show that only 8% of people with past-year substance use disorders (SUD) received any treatment for these disorders in the past year, resulting in high costs, both in terms of their own health and functioning and costs to society. Pilot work demonstrates that the proposed intervention has the potential to significantly increase SUD treatment engagement among patients with SUD within Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs), and thereby reduce substance use and other related consequences. This project is being done in close collaboration with several FQHC providers to facilitate the potential for subsequent dissemination to other FQHCs and primary care settings.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Individuals with substance use disorders (SUDs) can be readily identified within primary care settings, but current interventions are not effective at linking them to SUD treatment. Patient and system level barriers present significant challenges and new, more robust, linkage models are needed that can successfully overcome the barriers. Identifying more effective linkage models is a priority within addiction health services, since untreated individuals with SUDs have poorer health and employment outcomes over time as well as use significantly more acute care services, resulting in substantially higher medical costs, compared with those who receive SUD treatment.

Results from three clinical trials conducted by the applicant team have demonstrated the effectiveness of Recovery Management Checkups (RMC) as a linkage model for individuals needing SUD treatment. Moreover, RMC participants were significantly more likely to enter treatment, enter sooner, and stay longer, having fewer days of use and fewer SUD symptoms. Outcomes were also associated with lower health care utilization, decreased criminal activity, and substantial savings to society, thereby offsetting the costs of additional treatment. RMC was modified for primary care (RMC-PC) and pilot results conducted in Federally Qualified Health Centers (FQHCs) indicated RMC-PC significantly increased the number of patients who agreed to go to treatment (72% vs. 97%; OR=12.6, p\<.05) and who showed for treatment (12% vs. 75%, OR=22.0, p\<.0001). Moreover, relative to patients in these same settings who received the usual referral condition, those who received RMC-PC had significantly greater reductions (post-pre) in their past-month days of any illicit drug use or misuse of prescription medications (-11.21 vs -22.11 days, d=-0.81, p\<.001).

In this trial, investigators will: a) recruit 300 adult patients with SUD through SBIRT programs in 4 FQHC sites, b) randomly assign half to a referral as usual control and half to RMC-PC, and c) conduct quarterly follow-ups for 12-months post enrollment. Hypotheses include: H1 Relative to the control patients, patients receiving RMC-PC will be more likely to: a) initiate SUD treatment sooner, b) receive any SUD treatment, and c) receive more days of SUD treatment. H2. Relative to the control patients, patients receiving RMC-PC and those who receive more SUD treatment will report fewer days of: a) any alcohol use, b) use of illicit drugs or misuse of prescription medications, c) any substance use, and d) SUD problems. H3. The days of treatment will mediate the relationship between RMC-PC and changes in the pre and post measures of the dependent variables in H2.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Substance Use Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Compares Screening, Brief Intervention and Referral to Treatment (SBIRT) as currently practiced at federal qualified health centers (FQHC) as a practice as usual comparison group vs. SBIRT+ Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care at the time of referral and quarterly for 12 months.
Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

SBIRT as Usual

The follow-up team will (a) contact participants within 24-48 hours to collect additional locator information and mailing a schedule card for the next interview, (b) receipt information in a management information system (MIS), (c) assign each case to a follow-up case tracker, (d) verify locator data, (e) conduct outreach for unverified cases and discussing them at weekly meetings, (f) mail thank-you cards to participants and collaterals, (g) schedule follow-up appointments, (h) mail 3 and 6 week post-enrollment flyers, (i) implement returned-mail procedures, (j) call participants 6 weeks before appointment to confirm date and location (phone vs. research office), (k) conduct outreach for unconfirmed cases and review them at weekly meetings, (l) complete follow-up interviews and scheduling next appointments, and (m) implement a no-show protocol.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SBIRT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

As part of regular practice FQHC screen patients at least once a year with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) to identify alcohol problems and Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) to identify drug problems. Those who are the most severed and "referred to treatment" are approached about participating in the study.

SBIRT + RMC-PC

Patients will receive SBIRT plus the RMC protocol. The Linkage Manager (LM) will: 1) provide personalized feedback to participants about the status of their condition based on responses from the Global Appraisal of Individual Needs Quick version 3 (GAIN-Q3), 2) help participants resolve ambivalence about their dependence and moving them toward a commitment to change by accessing additional care, 3) address existing barriers to treatment, 4) schedule an assessment, and 5) facilitate reentry and engagement. The LM will stay in contact 2-3 times per week for two weeks to ensure that individuals both initiate and remain engaged in treatment.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

SBIRT

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

As part of regular practice FQHC screen patients at least once a year with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) to identify alcohol problems and Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) to identify drug problems. Those who are the most severed and "referred to treatment" are approached about participating in the study.

SBIRT+RMC-PC

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

In addition to SBIRT, those randomly assigned to the experimental condition will also receive Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care (RMC-PC) at the time of referral/study enrollment and quarterly for 12 months. RMC-PC involves a linkage manager reviewing the assessment data and using motivational interviewing to encourage the person to go to treatment and identify barriers to entering or staying in treatment. It also involves problem solving on how to address common issues (e.g., transportation, scheduling), staying in regular contact for the first two weeks to make sure they stay in treatment, and checking in on continuing care compliance at later checkups.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SBIRT

As part of regular practice FQHC screen patients at least once a year with the Alcohol Use Disorders Identification Test (AUDIT) to identify alcohol problems and Drug Abuse Screening Test (DAST) to identify drug problems. Those who are the most severed and "referred to treatment" are approached about participating in the study.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

SBIRT+RMC-PC

In addition to SBIRT, those randomly assigned to the experimental condition will also receive Recovery Management Checkups for Primary Care (RMC-PC) at the time of referral/study enrollment and quarterly for 12 months. RMC-PC involves a linkage manager reviewing the assessment data and using motivational interviewing to encourage the person to go to treatment and identify barriers to entering or staying in treatment. It also involves problem solving on how to address common issues (e.g., transportation, scheduling), staying in regular contact for the first two weeks to make sure they stay in treatment, and checking in on continuing care compliance at later checkups.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* scoring in the moderate to high range on the AUDIT or DAST

Exclusion Criteria

* under 18
* a non-resident of Chicago or plan to move outside of Chicago within 12 months
* sentenced to a confined environment most of the next 12 months
* mandated to treatment because of a driving under the influence offense
* not fluent in English or Spanish
* cognitively unable to provide informed consent
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism (NIAAA)

NIH

Sponsor Role collaborator

Chestnut Health Systems

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dennis Watson

Senior Research Scientist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Friend Family Health Center

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Heartland Alliance Health

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Christian Community Health Center

Lansing, Illinois, United States

Site Status

PCC Wellness

Oak Park, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Scott CK, Grella CE, Dennis ML, Nicholson L. Linking Individuals with Substance Use Disorders (SUDs) in Primary Care to SUD Treatment: the Recovery Management Checkups-Primary Care (RMC-PC) Pilot Study. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2018 Apr;45(2):160-173. doi: 10.1007/s11414-017-9576-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29181779 (View on PubMed)

Scott CK, Dennis ML, Grella CE, Watson DP, Davis JP, Hart MK. Using recovery management checkups for primary care to improve linkage to alcohol and other drug use treatment: a randomized controlled trial three month findings. Addiction. 2023 Mar;118(3):520-532. doi: 10.1111/add.16064. Epub 2022 Oct 29.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 36208061 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Informed Consent Form

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

R01AA024440

Identifier Type: NIH

Identifier Source: secondary_id

View Link

1119-1216

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Impact of Smell Testing on Health Outcomes
NCT07222891 NOT_YET_RECRUITING PHASE2
A Comparison of the ASHC and CDSMP
NCT00207415 COMPLETED NA