Clinical Evaluation of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Primary Malignant Sarcomas That Originate in Bone
NCT ID: NCT03742063
Last Updated: 2019-04-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
190 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2017-06-01
2018-10-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Narlumosbartmab Combined With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Bone-derived Malignancies With Osteolytic Lesions and Multinucleated Giant Cells
NCT06302465
Pulmonary Resectable Osteosarcoma Treated by Metastasectomy and Pre-operative Immunotherapy and Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (PROMIS): a Prospective Clinical Trial
NCT06114225
Chemotherapy Plus Immunotherapy Combined With SBRT as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Resectable NSCLC
NCT06718309
A Real-world Study of the Efficacy and Safety of PD-1 Inhibitors Combined With Chemoradiotherapy in Lung Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
NCT07062484
Screening Non Small Cell Lung Cancer With Bone Metastasis and Efficacy and Safety Research of Receiving Bisphosphonates
NCT00765687
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Huvos group I
Upon histopathological examination, the tumor response was assessed on the basis of the presence and extent of necrosis, which was assessed by a combination of gross and microscopic observations. Tumor necrosis was graded as per Picci et al. tumor histopathological response grading (Huvos classification), where grade I is 0% to 49%.
first-line chemotherapy
patients who routinely received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to Peking University People's Hospital chemo-protocols (PKUPH-OS and PKUPH-ES)
Huvos group II
Upon histopathological examination, the tumor response was assessed on the basis of the presence and extent of necrosis, which was assessed by a combination of gross and microscopic observations. Tumor necrosis was graded as per Picci et al. tumor histopathological response grading (Huvos classification), where grade II is 50% to 89%.
first-line chemotherapy
patients who routinely received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to Peking University People's Hospital chemo-protocols (PKUPH-OS and PKUPH-ES)
Huvos group III
Upon histopathological examination, the tumor response was assessed on the basis of the presence and extent of necrosis, which was assessed by a combination of gross and microscopic observations. Tumor necrosis was graded as per Picci et al. tumor histopathological response grading (Huvos classification), where grade III is 90% to 99%.
first-line chemotherapy
patients who routinely received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to Peking University People's Hospital chemo-protocols (PKUPH-OS and PKUPH-ES)
Huvos group IV
Upon histopathological examination, the tumor response was assessed on the basis of the presence and extent of necrosis, which was assessed by a combination of gross and microscopic observations. Tumor necrosis was graded as per Picci et al. tumor histopathological response grading (Huvos classification), where grade IV is 100% necrosis.
first-line chemotherapy
patients who routinely received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to Peking University People's Hospital chemo-protocols (PKUPH-OS and PKUPH-ES)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
first-line chemotherapy
patients who routinely received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to Peking University People's Hospital chemo-protocols (PKUPH-OS and PKUPH-ES)
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* (2) patients who routinely received neoadjuvant chemotherapy according to Peking University People's Hospital chemo-protocols (PKUPH-OS and PKUPH-ES);
* (3) patients who had primary tumor resection with assessment of histological response according to literatures;
* (4) patients who had intact pre- and post-neoadjuvant chemotherapy imaging, which included X-ray, contrasted computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the primary lesions as well as chest CT (with each layer ≤5 mm), bone scan, or \[18F\]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography (FDG-PET);
* (5) patients for whom follow-up information and evaluation after chemotherapy were available.
Exclusion Criteria
* patients without surgery of the primary site/ without pathological analysis of the specimens;
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Peking University Shougang Hospital
OTHER
Peking University People's Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Wei Guo, Ph.D. and M.D.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Musculoskeletal Tumor Center of Peking University People's Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Peking University People's Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Peking University Shougang Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Moertel CG, Hanley JA. The effect of measuring error on the results of therapeutic trials in advanced cancer. Cancer. 1976 Jul;38(1):388-94. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(197607)38:13.0.co;2-a.
Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med. 2009 May;50 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):122S-50S. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.108.057307.
Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J, Schwartz LH, Sargent D, Ford R, Dancey J, Arbuck S, Gwyther S, Mooney M, Rubinstein L, Shankar L, Dodd L, Kaplan R, Lacombe D, Verweij J. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026.
Choi H, Charnsangavej C, Faria SC, Macapinlac HA, Burgess MA, Patel SR, Chen LL, Podoloff DA, Benjamin RS. Correlation of computed tomography and positron emission tomography in patients with metastatic gastrointestinal stromal tumor treated at a single institution with imatinib mesylate: proposal of new computed tomography response criteria. J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1753-9. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.07.3049.
Hamaoka T, Madewell JE, Podoloff DA, Hortobagyi GN, Ueno NT. Bone imaging in metastatic breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jul 15;22(14):2942-53. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.181.
Smith AD, Shah SN, Rini BI, Lieber ML, Remer EM. Morphology, Attenuation, Size, and Structure (MASS) criteria: assessing response and predicting clinical outcome in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on antiangiogenic targeted therapy. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jun;194(6):1470-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.3456.
Smith AD, Lieber ML, Shah SN. Assessing tumor response and detecting recurrence in metastatic renal cell carcinoma on targeted therapy: importance of size and attenuation on contrast-enhanced CT. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2010 Jan;194(1):157-65. doi: 10.2214/AJR.09.2941.
Tsuchida Y, Therasse P. Response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST): new guidelines. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2001 Jul;37(1):1-3. doi: 10.1002/mpo.1154. No abstract available.
Costelloe CM, Chuang HH, Madewell JE, Ueno NT. Cancer Response Criteria and Bone Metastases: RECIST 1.1, MDA and PERCIST. J Cancer. 2010 Jun 28;1:80-92. doi: 10.7150/jca.1.80.
Bajpai J, Kumar R, Sreenivas V, Sharma MC, Khan SA, Rastogi S, Malhotra A, Gamnagatti S, Kumar R, Safaya R, Bakhshi S. Prediction of chemotherapy response by PET-CT in osteosarcoma: correlation with histologic necrosis. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol. 2011 Oct;33(7):e271-8. doi: 10.1097/MPH.0b013e31820ff78e.
Byun BH, Kim SH, Lim SM, Lim I, Kong CB, Song WS, Cho WH, Jeon DG, Lee SY, Koh JS, Chung SK. Prediction of response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in osteosarcoma using dual-phase (18)F-FDG PET/CT. Eur Radiol. 2015 Jul;25(7):2015-24. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3609-3. Epub 2015 Feb 14.
Bajpai J, Gamnagatti S, Kumar R, Sreenivas V, Sharma MC, Khan SA, Rastogi S, Malhotra A, Safaya R, Bakhshi S. Role of MRI in osteosarcoma for evaluation and prediction of chemotherapy response: correlation with histological necrosis. Pediatr Radiol. 2011 Apr;41(4):441-50. doi: 10.1007/s00247-010-1876-3. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
Lamuraglia M, Raslan S, Elaidi R, Oudard S, Escudier B, Slimane K, Penna RR, Wagner M, Lucidarme O. mTOR-inhibitor treatment of metastatic renal cell carcinoma: contribution of Choi and modified Choi criteria assessed in 2D or 3D to evaluate tumor response. Eur Radiol. 2016 Jan;26(1):278-85. doi: 10.1007/s00330-015-3828-7. Epub 2015 May 8.
O JH, Lodge MA, Wahl RL. Practical PERCIST: A Simplified Guide to PET Response Criteria in Solid Tumors 1.0. Radiology. 2016 Aug;280(2):576-84. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2016142043. Epub 2016 Feb 24.
Rosen G, Caparros B, Huvos AG, Kosloff C, Nirenberg A, Cacavio A, Marcove RC, Lane JM, Mehta B, Urban C. Preoperative chemotherapy for osteogenic sarcoma: selection of postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy based on the response of the primary tumor to preoperative chemotherapy. Cancer. 1982 Mar 15;49(6):1221-30. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19820315)49:63.0.co;2-e.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CBTRA-00
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.