Evaluation of Ventilation Homogeneity as a Marker of Small Airway Disease in Active Smokers

NCT ID: NCT03728712

Last Updated: 2022-11-14

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-30

Study Completion Date

2022-11-09

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Ventilation heterogeneity is a hallmark feature of most obstructive pulmonary diseases. In particular, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is pathologically and physiologically characterized by small airway destruction and marked airway cellular inflammation, which result in prominent expiratory airflow limitation, air trapping, hyperinflation and abnormal gas exchange. COPD is strongly linked with the exposition to inhaled irritants, most notably tobacco smoke, and is as such a potentially preventable disease. COPD-related morbidity, mortality and social costs are high: in Canada, COPD is the main cause of hospital admission among all chronic diseases and is the fourth leading cause of death.

Diagnosis of COPD requires the objective demonstration of expiratory airflow limitation using spirometry. In the right clinical context, a post-bronchodilator forced vital capacity (FVC) / forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) ratio \<0.70 is considered indicative of the presence of COPD, and therefore pulmonary function testing is required to make the diagnosis. However, the natural history of COPD represents a slowly-progressive continuum: active smokers that do not meet the criteria for COPD are still at risk of developing the disease. In fact, when compared to healthy non-smokers, active smokers without overt COPD can already show some pathological and clinical features of the disease. Notably, they report increased levels of resting dyspnea, chronic cough, lower exercise capacity, exercise-induced dynamic hyperinflation and marked airway inflammatory cellular infiltration, while conserving normal pulmonary function test values.

These findings highlight the negative, clinically-measurable effects of tobacco smoking on pulmonary function, but also the limitations of standard pulmonary function testing in identifying the presence of early, mild airway disease and quantifying physiological limitations in these subjects. As such, there is a need for a novel, simple and reliable method of quantifying airway disease in this population.

Quantitative lung ventilation single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) allows an objective quantification of the regional heterogeneity of ventilation in humans. The coefficient of variation (CV) of the distribution of a radioactive tracer, inhaled during the test, allows the generation of heterogeneity maps and density curves of small elements of the lung. These variables are sensitive to the presence of COPD, asthma, air trapping and are correlated to even slight anomalies in pulmonary function testing in otherwise healthy subjects. As such, SPECT could prove useful as an early marker of airway disease in active smokers at risk of developing COPD, but its use in this context has never been formally tested.

This pilot study addresses the question of whether lung SPECT could provide clinically relevant information on airway disease in active smokers without overt lung disease on pulmonary lung function testing.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lung Function Testing Cigarette Smoking Single-photon Emission Computed Tomography (SPECT) Ventilation Homogeneity Lung Disease Prevention

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

CASE_CONTROL

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Never smokers

Participants with no history of cigarette smoking

SPECT/CT

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Technegas-Tc99m is approved by Health Canada for the evaluation of ventilation. Technegas will be prepared with a Technegas Generator (Cyclomedica) according to the manufacturer recommendations with a simmer phase and a burning phase. 95% ethanol will be used to wet the carbon crucible. The crucible will be loaded with 20-30 mCi of Tc99m. Tc99m has a physical half-life of 6 hours.

Technegas will be administered to the patient within 10 minutes of its preparation, in a separate room than the scanning room. The inhalation technique will be rehearsed with the patient prior to the actual inhalation. The patient will be in supine position. A mouth piece and a nose clip will be used. The patient will be instructed to take 3 breaths of Technegas, starting after normal exhalation. A survey meter will be used to monitor the quality of the inhalation.

Active smokers

Participants with an active history of cigarette smoking AND at least 10 pack-years total smoking history

SPECT/CT

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Technegas-Tc99m is approved by Health Canada for the evaluation of ventilation. Technegas will be prepared with a Technegas Generator (Cyclomedica) according to the manufacturer recommendations with a simmer phase and a burning phase. 95% ethanol will be used to wet the carbon crucible. The crucible will be loaded with 20-30 mCi of Tc99m. Tc99m has a physical half-life of 6 hours.

Technegas will be administered to the patient within 10 minutes of its preparation, in a separate room than the scanning room. The inhalation technique will be rehearsed with the patient prior to the actual inhalation. The patient will be in supine position. A mouth piece and a nose clip will be used. The patient will be instructed to take 3 breaths of Technegas, starting after normal exhalation. A survey meter will be used to monitor the quality of the inhalation.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

SPECT/CT

Technegas-Tc99m is approved by Health Canada for the evaluation of ventilation. Technegas will be prepared with a Technegas Generator (Cyclomedica) according to the manufacturer recommendations with a simmer phase and a burning phase. 95% ethanol will be used to wet the carbon crucible. The crucible will be loaded with 20-30 mCi of Tc99m. Tc99m has a physical half-life of 6 hours.

Technegas will be administered to the patient within 10 minutes of its preparation, in a separate room than the scanning room. The inhalation technique will be rehearsed with the patient prior to the actual inhalation. The patient will be in supine position. A mouth piece and a nose clip will be used. The patient will be instructed to take 3 breaths of Technegas, starting after normal exhalation. A survey meter will be used to monitor the quality of the inhalation.

Intervention Type DIAGNOSTIC_TEST

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Active tobacco smoking of at least 10 cigarettes/day AND total smoking history of at least 15 pack-years.
* Normal lung function testing, defined as: FVC/FEV1 ratio, FEV1 and FVC all greater than the lower limit of normal; mean forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of CVF (FEF25-75%) \>80% of predicted value and absence of concavity on the forced expiratory flow curve, as evaluated by a trained respirologist; total lung capacity (TLC) greater than the lower limit of normal; residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC) and VR/TLC ratio all \>80% predicted value and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \>80% predicted value when corrected for hemoglobin level.
* Body mass index (BMI) \<30 kg/m2


* No history of tobacco-smoking.
* Normal lung function testing, defined as: FVC/FEV1 ratio, FEV1 and FVC all greater than the lower limit of normal; mean forced expiratory flow at 25 to 75% of CVF (FEF25-75%) \>80% of predicted value and absence of concavity on the forced expiratory flow curve, as evaluated by a trained respirologist; total lung capacity (TLC) greater than the lower limit of normal; residual volume (RV), functional residual capacity (FRC), expiratory reserve volume (ERV), inspiratory capacity (IC) and VR/TLC ratio all \>80% predicted value and diffusion capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide (DLCO) \>80% predicted value when corrected for hemoglobin level.
* Body mass index (BMI) \<30 kg/m2

Exclusion Criteria

• Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC of more than 6% and/or 100 ml.

For Non-smokers group:


• Post-bronchodilator change in FEV1 and FVC of more than 6% and/or 100 ml.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Cyclomedica Australia PTY Limited

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Bruno-Pierre Dubé, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Centre hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CHUM)

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

18.149

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.