Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
WITHDRAWN
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-11-30
2021-09-09
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Carotid Artery Disease is caused by the formation of an atherosclerotic plaque in the vessel. Stroke or TIA occurs when plaque or adherent thrombus breaks off and embolises to the brain, blocking off its blood supply. Hence, a carotid plaque is said to be symptomatic if it has caused a Stroke or TIA in the territory of the brain supplied by that vessel in the previous six months.
Currently, the degree of stenosis (narrowing) of the artery by doppler ultrasound is the main assessment performed. Doppler ultrasound measures stenosis and elevation of blood flow velocity in the artery prior to surgical intervention. However, it has been shown that the degree of stenosis is a poor predictor of stroke as many asymptomatic patients have severe stenosis and many symptomatic patients have moderate stenosis. Stenosis is a two dimensional assessment of a 3-D structure.
Other features of the plaque should be considered including the volume of the carotid plaque and its constituents. Carotid Plaque Volume has been measured in 339 individuals, with plaque volume being higher in symptomatic than asymptomatic individuals. In this study, plaque volume did not correlate with stenosis degree. No studies have been conducted measuring the change in carotid plaque volume and morphology following a stroke. This pilot study will perform serial duplex scans on recently symptomatic individuals over a 12 week period and observe the changes in Plaque Volume and morphology. This will attempt to prove that carotid plaque volume is a better predictor of stroke than stenosis. The investigators will also aim to identify other plaque features that may have an important role in predicting stroke risk. Documenting the timescale of change in plaque volume will aid us in defining appropriate timescales for treating the symptomatic population and when those having medical management's risk has returned to baseline. Observing the change in plaque immediately after stroke will improve our knowledge of the changes in plaques that lead to symptoms and may in the future help us predict which patients with asymptomatic carotid stenosis need operation.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ultrafast Ultrasound Imaging Assesment of Carotid Plaque Neovascularization
NCT04470687
Carotid Plaque Imaging in Acute Stroke
NCT01284933
Carotid Plaque Characterization Using Innovative Ultrasound Techniques
NCT06804707
Reproducibility Study of Transcranial Doppler
NCT03050567
The Relationship Between Controlling Risk Factors and Cerebral Haemodynamics in Lacunar Stroke
NCT06354881
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although carotid stenosis is the primary factor used to determine stroke risk and clinical priority in carotid artery disease, stenosis is in fact a poor predictor of stroke risk. Specifically, in asymptomatic patients with \>70% carotid stenosis, the risk of ipsilateral stroke is under 2% a year. Therefore in these patients the benefit of intervention with carotid endarterectomy is minimal, in simple terms around 32 CEA's would need to be undertaken to prevent just one stroke in carotid artery disease patients over a five year follow up period. This clearly indicates that carotid stenosis itself is a poor indictor of stroke risk.
Several other factors have been proposed as potentially relevant to stroke risk determination in carotid artery disease.
Carotid plaque volume
Carotid plaque volume (CPV) is the actual volume of atherosclerotic plaque present within the carotid artery. CPV may impact on stroke risk in Carotid artery disease as an increased atherosclerotic burden may disrupt carotid flow leading to thrombus formation and subsequent embolisation leading to CVA.
A recent pilot study recruiting over 200 patients demonstrated that CPV in patients undergoing CEA within four weeks of symptoms was almost double of that seen in asymptomatic patients, with mean CPV in the symptomatic group being 1.1cm3 compared with 0.68cm3 in the asymptomatic group (p\<0.001). Interestingly, carotid plaque volume was also shown to fall rapidly following symptoms of cerebral ischemia from 1.1cm3 within four weeks of cerebral symptoms to 0.91cm3 at six weeks and a mean of only 0.62 cm3 more than eight weeks following symptoms. This data demonstrated that there may be a crucial link between CPV and cerebrovascular symptoms in carotid artery disease and therefore between CPV and stroke risk in the disease.
Carotid Plaque Morphology
Various studies have detailed carotid plaque histology to identify features that are related to cerebrovascular symptoms. The main features being; intra-plaque haemorrhage, plaque ulceration, fibrous cap thickness and lipid rich necrotic core. Fisher et al showed plaque ulceration was significantly more common in plaques in symptomatic patients. Xu et al also reported that disruption of the luminal surface, by fibrous cap rupture, intraplaque haemorrhage or ulceration is indicative of a high risk lesion. The project aims to identify these features on 3D duplex.
3D Duplex
3D duplex has been used to measure plaque volume and is proven to be reliable. The inter and intra observer variability have been shown to be low but increase with reducing amounts of total plaque volume. The study hypothesises that Carotid Plaque volume will correlate more with risk of stroke than the degree of stenosis.
Antiplatelet Resistance
All carotid patients are treated with antiplatelet agents, commonly aspirin or clopidogrel, to reduce the incidence of thrombus formation around plaques. This intervention is thought to reduce stroke risk by around 9% annually and is therefore a key therapy in the management of carotid artery disease. Research has suggested that up to 37% of the population may be resistant to the actions of antiplatelet agents; if this is true in carotid artery disease patients it would represent a severe shortfall in current treatment and the prevalence and impact of this resistance may also impact on the risk of stroke in CAD patients. Patients will be tested for antiplatelet resistance at two timepoints to establish if they have resistance to the agents but also to see the effect of the acute embolic event on the efficacy of antiplatelet agents.
A recent pilot study involving 35 patients demonstrated a significant prevalence of antiplatelet resistance in CAD patients and showed an association between cerebrovascular symptoms and residual platelet aggregation. This further strengthens the hypothesis that antiplatelet resistance may be associated with stroke risk in CAD. Data from this project demonstrates that antiplatelet resistance may be prevalent in the CAD patient population and that the impact of this resistance, although potentially significant, is as yet not fully understood.
Schedule of events
The procedures will be performed at the following time intervals;
* \< 7 days 3D Duplex + Platelet aggregometry
* Day 14 (+/- 2 days) 3D Duplex
* Day 28 (+/- 2 days) 3D Duplex
* Day 56 (+/- 2 days) 3D Duplex
* Day 84 (+/- 2 days) 3D Duplex + Platelet aggregometry
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
3 Dimensional tomographic Ultrasound
3-D tUS at five timepoints following acute ipsilateral stroke or Transient Ischaemic attack (TIA) to document carotid plaque volume and presence or absence of adverse plaque features.
Platelet Aggregometry
Blood test to test for platelet resistance to aspirin or clopidogrel and to measure effect of acute inflammatory response post event.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Carotid Stenosis \>50%.
Exclusion Criteria
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Manchester University NHS Foundation Trust
OTHER_GOV
University of Manchester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Alison Phair
Carotid Clinical Research Fellow
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Charles McCollum, Prof.
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Manchester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Manchester University hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Northern Care Alliance, Salford Royal NHS Foundation Trust
Manchester, Greater Manchester, United Kingdom
Manchester Foundation Trust, Wythenshawe site.
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
UHSMCADAS
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.