Calistar A vs. Calistar S - Comparative Cohort Retrospective Analysis of Single Incision POP Systems
NCT ID: NCT03715803
Last Updated: 2020-03-20
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
217 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2018-10-25
2019-12-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prospective Long-term Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Calistar S for Transvaginal Pelvic Organ Prolapse Repair
NCT03821142
Comparison of 2 Lightweight Y-meshes After Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy
NCT02248935
Flat Polypropylene Mesh in the Treatment of Uterine and Recurrent or Advanced Pelvic Organ Prolapse
NCT06225375
Role of Mesh in Laparoscopic Sacropexy Surgical Techniques for the Treatment of Female Genital Prolapse
NCT06720831
Comparison of Vaginal and Laparoscopic Apical Fixation Techniques for Pelvic Organ Prolapse Treatment
NCT05420831
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
RETROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Calistar A
Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical POP
Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical POP
Single incision surgery using Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses
Calistar S
Calistar S mesh to treat anterior and apical POP
Calistar S mesh to treat anterior and apical POP
Single incision surgery using Calistar S to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical POP
Single incision surgery using Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses
Calistar S mesh to treat anterior and apical POP
Single incision surgery using Calistar S to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anterior and apical prolapse Stage 3 (according to POP-Q) or more with or without stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
* Primary or recurrent treatment with Calistar S or Calistar A
* At least 6 months follow-up
Exclusion Criteria
* Chronic colorectal diseases (chronic nonspecific ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis, diverticulosis, Chron's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, familial polyposis).
* Presence of any coagulopathies,
* Impairment of the immune system or any condition that compromises recovery,
* Prior irradiation
* Chronic pelvic pain
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Agustin Sampietro
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Agustin Sampietro
Gynecologist
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Agustín Sampietro, Dr
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Hospital Británico
Buenos Aires, , Argentina
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
de Tayrac R, Madelenat P. [Evolution of surgical routes in female stress urinary incontinence]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004 Dec;32(12):1031-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.10.019. French.
Bigozzi MA, Provenzano S, Maeda F, Palma P, Riccetto C. In vivo biomechanical properties of heavy versus light weight monofilament polypropylene meshes. Does the knitting pattern matter? Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):73-79. doi: 10.1002/nau.22890. Epub 2015 Oct 5.
Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):600-609. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae.
Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, Maher C, Haylen B, Athanasiou S, Swift S, Whitmore K, Ghoniem G, de Ridder D; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Apr;31(4):415-21. doi: 10.1002/nau.22238.
Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CaSCaA
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.