Calistar A vs. Calistar S - Comparative Cohort Retrospective Analysis of Single Incision POP Systems

NCT ID: NCT03715803

Last Updated: 2020-03-20

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

217 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-25

Study Completion Date

2019-12-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to compare the initial outcomes and complication of two meshes implanted through a single incision to treat anterior and apical prolapses, Calistar A and a second-generation low weight mesh called Calistar S (Soft).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The main objective of this study is to compare the initial outcomes and complication of two meshes implanted through a single incision to treat anterior and apical prolapses, Calistar A and a second-generation low weight mesh called Calistar S (Soft). In such sense, objective and subjective parameters will be retrospectively tested to demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of this products. Safety will be assessed by register of complications and effectiveness will be evaluated by pelvic floor reconstruction and quality of life improvements.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Pelvic Organ Prolapse

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

RETROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Calistar A

Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical POP

Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical POP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single incision surgery using Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses

Calistar S

Calistar S mesh to treat anterior and apical POP

Calistar S mesh to treat anterior and apical POP

Intervention Type DEVICE

Single incision surgery using Calistar S to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical POP

Single incision surgery using Calistar A mesh to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses

Intervention Type DEVICE

Calistar S mesh to treat anterior and apical POP

Single incision surgery using Calistar S to treat anterior and apical pelvic prolapses

Intervention Type DEVICE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Female
* Anterior and apical prolapse Stage 3 (according to POP-Q) or more with or without stress urinary incontinence (SUI)
* Primary or recurrent treatment with Calistar S or Calistar A
* At least 6 months follow-up

Exclusion Criteria

* Recurrent vaginal infections,
* Chronic colorectal diseases (chronic nonspecific ulcerative colitis, diverticulitis, diverticulosis, Chron's disease, irritable bowel syndrome, familial polyposis).
* Presence of any coagulopathies,
* Impairment of the immune system or any condition that compromises recovery,
* Prior irradiation
* Chronic pelvic pain
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Agustin Sampietro

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Agustin Sampietro

Gynecologist

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Agustín Sampietro, Dr

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Faculty of Medicine, University of Buenos Aires

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Británico

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Argentina

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

de Tayrac R, Madelenat P. [Evolution of surgical routes in female stress urinary incontinence]. Gynecol Obstet Fertil. 2004 Dec;32(12):1031-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gyobfe.2004.10.019. French.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15589779 (View on PubMed)

Bigozzi MA, Provenzano S, Maeda F, Palma P, Riccetto C. In vivo biomechanical properties of heavy versus light weight monofilament polypropylene meshes. Does the knitting pattern matter? Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Jan;36(1):73-79. doi: 10.1002/nau.22890. Epub 2015 Oct 5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 26436858 (View on PubMed)

Barber MD, Brubaker L, Nygaard I, Wheeler TL 2nd, Schaffer J, Chen Z, Spino C; Pelvic Floor Disorders Network. Defining success after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Sep;114(3):600-609. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181b2b1ae.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19701041 (View on PubMed)

Toozs-Hobson P, Freeman R, Barber M, Maher C, Haylen B, Athanasiou S, Swift S, Whitmore K, Ghoniem G, de Ridder D; International Urogynecological Association; International Continence Society. An International Urogynecological Association (IUGA)/International Continence Society (ICS) joint report on the terminology for reporting outcomes of surgical procedures for pelvic organ prolapse. Neurourol Urodyn. 2012 Apr;31(4):415-21. doi: 10.1002/nau.22238.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22517068 (View on PubMed)

Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19638912 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CaSCaA

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.