The Efficacy of Pre-operative Educational Pelvic Floor Intervention on Urinary Continence

NCT ID: NCT03714984

Last Updated: 2024-04-17

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-10-15

Study Completion Date

2023-12-04

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer between male population and urinary incontinence (UI) is the most common of long-term sequelae. Nowadays, robotic prostatectomy became the surgery standard but there is still discrepant results regards the incidence of UI and there is a lack of studies about the use of pelvic floor rehabilitation in this population. Our study aims to assesses the efficacy of preoperative educational method in urinary incontinence after robotic prostatectomy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Prostate cancer is the most common type of cancer between male population, with 161,300 new cases a year in the USA and an incidence of 10% in Italy. Since many years surgery is the treatment of choice, both at an early stage and in advanced cases, but involves side effects. From the post-operative problem presents in literature, urinary incontinence (UI) is the most common of long-term sequelae and significantly affects the quality of life and the psychological aspect in the post-surgical period. The incidence of UI after prostatectomy surgery varies between 0.8% and 87% in the first 3 and 6 months and between 5% and 44.5% after 1 year. This variability depends on the UI definition and the type of measurement used, which are not homogeneous among the various studies in the literature. Evaluations that are not objective make it difficult to compare the results obtained, thus creating discrepancies.

To date, robotic prostatectomy is becoming the gold standard for its recognized greater accuracy when compared with the open surgery and laparoscopic procedure, with a reduced learning curve for operators and giving better post-surgical results. Progress technological aspects, such as the three-dimensional vision of the operative field, the macroscopic magnification and better image resolution, have made the robotic procedure a less invasive surgery with better functional outcomes. Despite these factors, UI is still present and in the majority of cases management is not completely evidence based. Moreover there is not yet a definite consensus regarding the predictive factors (age, disease stage, body weight, prostate volume and other comorbidities) in the incidence of the UI.

When patients presents UI diagnoses, the conservative intervention through the pelvic floor rehabilitation is recommended in an attempt to reduce the impact of this complication. Muscle strengthening and pelvic floor awareness after surgery are used for years in clinical practice with results widely documented in the literature, but their effectiveness in the pre-operative period, especially if after robotic surgery, has not yet been sufficiently studied. Currently, there are discrepant results mainly due to the type of rehabilitative methodology applied and the time of beginning the preoperative treatment. Our study tries to evaluate, through an objective and reproducible measurement, the efficacy of a preoperative educational method in urinary incontinence after robotic prostatectomy.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Prostatectomy Pelvic Floor Disorders

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Superiority trial with 1:1 allocation ratio, randomized with two-arm parallel group
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Pre operative exercise

The educational pelvic floor intervention group will receive one months before surgery a physiotherapy visit were will be explain to patients and care giver the pelvic floor anatomy and biomechanics and how perform the exercises to be follow at home focusing on pelvic muscles awareness and contraction. Patients and care giver will receive a daily exercise diary to fill at home and will be advised to follow the exercise program.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Pre operative exercise

Intervention Type OTHER

After randomization participants will be allocated in two groups. The educational pelvic floor intervention group will receive two months before surgery a physiotherapy visit were will be explain to patients and care giver the pelvic floor anatomy and biomechanics and how perform the exercises to be follow at home focusing on pelvic muscles awareness and contraction.

Control group

The control group will be just informed about the study protocol and will not receive any pre-operative intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Control Group

Intervention Type OTHER

The control group will be just informed about the study protocol and will not receive any pre-operative intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Pre operative exercise

After randomization participants will be allocated in two groups. The educational pelvic floor intervention group will receive two months before surgery a physiotherapy visit were will be explain to patients and care giver the pelvic floor anatomy and biomechanics and how perform the exercises to be follow at home focusing on pelvic muscles awareness and contraction.

Intervention Type OTHER

Control Group

The control group will be just informed about the study protocol and will not receive any pre-operative intervention.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Signed informed consent form
* Age \>= 40 \<= 70 years old
* Body mass Index \<= 27
* Indication of robotic prostate surgery
* Tumor with clinical stage T1 and T2.
* Extracapsular Extension Score \<= 3, measured with magnetic resonance before surgery.

Exclusion Criteria

* Pathologic T3 tumor with radiotherapy indication
* Previous prostate surgery
* Previous urinary incontinence.
* Metabolic disorder
* Central or peripheral neurologic disorders
* Inability to understand informed consent or to carry out the rehabilitation protocol autonomously.
Minimum Eligible Age

40 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

70 Years

Eligible Sex

MALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

European Institute of Oncology

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Luiz Felipe Nevola Teixeira, PT

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

European Institute of Oncology

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Istituto Europeo di Oncologia

Milan, Lombardy, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Fossati N, Di Trapani E, Gandaglia G, Dell'Oglio P, Umari P, Buffi NM, Guazzoni G, Mottrie A, Gaboardi F, Montorsi F, Briganti A, Suardi N. Assessing the Impact of Surgeon Experience on Urinary Continence Recovery After Robot-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy: Results of Four High-Volume Surgeons. J Endourol. 2017 Sep;31(9):872-877. doi: 10.1089/end.2017.0085. Epub 2017 Jul 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 28732186 (View on PubMed)

Centemero A, Rigatti L, Giraudo D, Lazzeri M, Lughezzani G, Zugna D, Montorsi F, Rigatti P, Guazzoni G. Preoperative pelvic floor muscle exercise for early continence after radical prostatectomy: a randomised controlled study. Eur Urol. 2010 Jun;57(6):1039-43. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.02.028. Epub 2010 Mar 1.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20227168 (View on PubMed)

Moore KN, Valiquette L, Chetner MP, Byrniak S, Herbison GP. Return to continence after radical retropubic prostatectomy: a randomized trial of verbal and written instructions versus therapist-directed pelvic floor muscle therapy. Urology. 2008 Dec;72(6):1280-6. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2007.12.034. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18384853 (View on PubMed)

Burgio KL, Goode PS, Urban DA, Umlauf MG, Locher JL, Bueschen A, Redden DT. Preoperative biofeedback assisted behavioral training to decrease post-prostatectomy incontinence: a randomized, controlled trial. J Urol. 2006 Jan;175(1):196-201; discussion 201. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5347(05)00047-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16406909 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

IEO 818

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Prehabilitation for Prostate Cancer Surgery
NCT02036684 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2