Liposomal Bupivicaine for Skin Graft Donor Sites in Burn Patients
NCT ID: NCT03705637
Last Updated: 2023-03-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
EARLY_PHASE1
6 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-06-01
2020-03-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
There has been the development of a new form of local anesthesia that can last up to 72 hours when injected into tissue. Based on encouraging results in the literature in areas outside of burns, this study aims to evaluate whether administration of this medication at the time of surgery can help improve pain for burn patients in the postoperative period.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Lidocaine For Treatment of Post-operative Pain From Donor Sites Following Burn Injury.
NCT02229578
Effect of Autologous Fat Grafting on Acute Burn Wound Healing
NCT03791710
Evaluating MMPs in Burns
NCT03148977
Graft Take and Microbiology in Burns
NCT01301118
Performance and Safety of Exufiber Ag+ and Exufiber on Partial Thickness Burns
NCT04839523
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Skin graft donor sites are the most painful portion of their surgical treatment and the pain typically is most severe during the first few days after surgery. For this reason, the investigators believe the addition of Exparel to the donor site will help with improved multi-modal pain control, making patients more comfortable. It also may decrease opiate requirements which would be beneficial for burn patients.
Few previous studies have been conducted using Exparel at the donor sites of skin grafted burn patients. One case series compares usage of Exparel from two different institutions, however the sample size at each was relatively small (n=20, 5, respectively). Their findings suggest that Exparel may be an effective way of managing postsurgical donor site pain. Based on these limited data there is a need for more robust studies, which is the motivation for doing this larger evaluation of patients.
The investigators believe that the use of Exparel can decrease pain for patients after surgery, in particular at their skin graft donor sites. The investigators want to conduct this study to evaluate whether Exparel can improve pain control for their patients and decrease their need for opiate narcotics.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exparel Arm
20ml Exparel + 10ml injectable 0.9% NS (30ml) for every 100cm2 of donor site.
Exparel
* Donor sites will receive up to 50mg of 0.25marcaine with epinephrine injected uniformly into the wound.
* The donor site will also receive one bottle (266mg) of Exparel, diluted to be administered uniformly into the entire donor site, spaced out ever 3-4cm. The dilution will be as follows:
o 20ml Exparel + 10ml injectable 0.9% NS (30ml) for every 100cm2 of donor site.
* Injection of local anesthesia will be performed after the donor site has been harvested and is hemostatic. The goal is to provide the maximum time possible for the local anesthetic to work while under anesthesia, so it can benefit the patient and not be administered at the end of the case just prior to extubation.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Exparel
* Donor sites will receive up to 50mg of 0.25marcaine with epinephrine injected uniformly into the wound.
* The donor site will also receive one bottle (266mg) of Exparel, diluted to be administered uniformly into the entire donor site, spaced out ever 3-4cm. The dilution will be as follows:
o 20ml Exparel + 10ml injectable 0.9% NS (30ml) for every 100cm2 of donor site.
* Injection of local anesthesia will be performed after the donor site has been harvested and is hemostatic. The goal is to provide the maximum time possible for the local anesthetic to work while under anesthesia, so it can benefit the patient and not be administered at the end of the case just prior to extubation.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Anticipated one trip to operating room for single stage excision and grafting
* Total donor site surface area \<500cm2
* Opioid naïve prior to admission for treatment of burn
* Patient able to consent
* 18 years or older
Exclusion Criteria
* Cardiac arrhythmias
* Heart block
* Pregnancy
* Breast-feeding mothers who will be unable to stop breastfeeding for 8 days post-injection
* Allergy to bupvicaine
* Bradycardia
* Severe liver disease
* Incapacity to consent themselves
* Unlikely to survive burn Burn related exclusions
* Current substance abuse
* On opioids prior to admission
* Burn larger than 15% TBSA
* Prior autografting for this particular burn
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Massachusetts General Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jonathan Friedstat
Instructor of surgery, Harvard Medical School
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rice DC, Cata JP, Mena GE, Rodriguez-Restrepo A, Correa AM, Mehran RJ. Posterior Intercostal Nerve Block With Liposomal Bupivacaine: An Alternative to Thoracic Epidural Analgesia. Ann Thorac Surg. 2015 Jun;99(6):1953-60. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2015.02.074. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
Mehran RJ, Martin LW, Baker CM, Mena GE, Rice DC. Pain Management in an Enhanced Recovery Pathway After Thoracic Surgical Procedures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2016 Dec;102(6):e595-e596. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2016.05.050.
Dissanaike S, McCauley J, Alphonso C. Liposomal bupivacaine for the management of postsurgical donor site pain in patients with burn injuries: a case series from two institutions. Clin Case Rep. 2017 Dec 5;6(1):129-135. doi: 10.1002/ccr3.1292. eCollection 2018 Jan.
Kaplan RS, Porter ME. How to solve the cost crisis in health care. Harv Bus Rev. 2011 Sep;89(9):46-52, 54, 56-61 passim.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MGH2018P001992
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.