CT-guided Ganglion Impar Block for Management of Phantom Rectal Pain Syndrome
NCT ID: NCT03694639
Last Updated: 2019-03-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
PHASE4
40 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2018-06-12
2019-07-29
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Method: Forty patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups: Group A (n=20) where patients received pregabaline 150 mg twice daily. Group B (n=20) where patients received pregabaline 150 mg twice daily plus ganglion impar block using 5 ml bupivacaine 5% with 14 mg/2 ml betamethasone.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Postoperative Analgesia Using Ganglion Impar Block After Anal Surgery
NCT04110132
Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block for Proximal-end Femur Fractures
NCT02696915
Cervical Epidural and Stellate Ganglion Block in Upper Limb Complex Regional Pain Syndrome
NCT05970146
Pudendal Nerve Block for Post-Episiotomy Pain Relief
NCT03944291
Comparison of Genicular Nerve Block and Intraarticular Injection for Postoperative Pain in Knee Arthroscopy
NCT04656743
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Phantom pain syndromes are mostly recorded after amputation of limbs, but it may affect any part of the body (visceral or somatic) has sensory perception following its removal as breast, teeth or rectum.
Patients underwent abdominoperineal resection with colostomy may suffered from phantom rectum pain syndrome in the perineal area characterized as pins, needles, stinging, and burning occurring mostly in sitting positions.
phantom rectum pain syndrome is rarely reported and it is varies from individual to individual. The presence of preoperative rectal pain has a good correlation for the development of postoperative phantom pain.
The pathophysiological mechanisms of phantom phenomena is still unknown but it is neuropathic in nature and believed that it is initiated by changes arising at the peripheral, spinal and supraspinal level leading to central reorganization in additional to the psychogenic factor.
Ganglion impar is a sympathetic ganglion used to manage acute or chronic perineal pain, situated directly in front of the coccyx around the sacrococcygeal joint and behind the rectum in the retroperitoneal space. It can be reached by any guidance as fluoroscopy, computerized tomography, or ultrasound.
Ganglion impar can be done by using multiple methods such as of local anesthetics with steroids or neurolysis by phenol, alcohol and radiofrequency.
The proposal of this study: Is to find the efficacy of the ganglion impar block in patients suffering from phantom rectal pain syndrome after abdominoperineal surgery for rectal cancer with colostomy.
Aim of the work:
To evaluate the combination between ganglion impar block to pregabaline in the treatment of phantom rectal pain syndrome.
Hypothesis:
Management of phantom rectal pain syndrome is a challenging issue needing more appropriate method to reach the best result.
Recharge Gap:
there is a no researches discuss this issue and how to manage it in best way.
Patients and methods:
Study design and participants This randomized pilot controlled study was conducted in pain clinic, Oncology Hospital, Mansoura University during the period from June 2018 till December 2018. The study was accepted by the institutional research board(R.18.09.288 ) . Written informed consents were obtained from forty patients aged from 18 to 70 years of either sex complained from phantom rectal pain syndrome after abdominoperineal surgery for rectal cancer with colostomy.
Patient exclusion criteria include: those who refused to share, evidence of local infection at the puncture site, allergy to drugs used, patients with bleeding tendency or coagulopathy, renal or hepatic failure, cardiac patients, bony abnormality and local malignant recurrence or lower vertebral metastasis.
Routine investigations as complete blood count, coagulation profile (partial thromboplastin time (PTT), prothrombin activity and international normalized ratio (INR)), liver and renal function tests were done prior to procedure. All patients were learned and assessed by numerical rating scale (NRS) for the intensity of pain (If no pain the score was equal zero, if it is worst pain imaginable the score was equal 10).
Sample size:
Internal pilot sample size was estimated on 8 patients during the following period using G-power analysis , assuming α (type I error)=0.05 and β (type II error)= 0.2 (power= 80%) calculate a total sample size of 40.
Patients were randomly allocated into 2 groups:
Group A (n=20) where patients received pregabaline 150 mg twice daily. Group B (n=20) where patients received pregabaline 150 mg twice daily plus ganglion impar block using 5 ml bupivacaine 5% with 14 mg/2 ml betamethasone.
Technique:
Patients were placed in prone position with a cushion under their lower abdomen. CT sections were done in the axial plane 4 mm slice thickness to detect the site of sacrococcygeal disk. After a suitable section was confirmed, two distances were measured, one from patient's spine to the proper site of entry and the other from the site of entry to the target point. Also the angle of needle entrance was calculated. The skin was marked and cleaned with an aseptic solution then anesthetized by 2 ml lidocaine 2%. 22 gauge spinal needle 12 cm was introduced until reach anterior to sacrococcygeal disk. When the needle tip location was ideal, 2 ml lidocaine mixed with1ml of radiopaque dye was injected. CT sagittal section was done to verify the retroperitoneal distribution of the dye. After good contrast spread confirmation, 5 ml bupivacaine 5% with 14 mg/2 ml betamethasone was injected. The patients were observed for one hour after block to note any complication and were discharged at the same day.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Pregabaline group
where patients received pregabaline 150 mg twice daily.
No interventions assigned to this group
Pregabaline plus ganglion impar block group
where patients received pregabaline 150 mg twice daily plus ganglion impar block using 5 ml bupivacaine 5% with 14 mg/2 ml betamethasone.
ganglion impar block
CT sections were done in the axial plane 4 mm slice thickness to detect the site of sacrococcygeal disk. After a suitable section was confirmed, two distances were measured, one from patient's spine to the proper site of entry and the other from the site of entry to the target point.22 gauge spinal needle 12 cm was introduced until reach anterior to sacrococcygeal disk. When the needle tip location was ideal, 2 ml lidocaine mixed with1ml of radiopaque dye was injected. CT sagittal section was done to verify the retroperitoneal distribution of the dye. After good contrast spread confirmation, 5 ml bupivacaine 5% with 14 mg/2 ml betamethasone was injected
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
ganglion impar block
CT sections were done in the axial plane 4 mm slice thickness to detect the site of sacrococcygeal disk. After a suitable section was confirmed, two distances were measured, one from patient's spine to the proper site of entry and the other from the site of entry to the target point.22 gauge spinal needle 12 cm was introduced until reach anterior to sacrococcygeal disk. When the needle tip location was ideal, 2 ml lidocaine mixed with1ml of radiopaque dye was injected. CT sagittal section was done to verify the retroperitoneal distribution of the dye. After good contrast spread confirmation, 5 ml bupivacaine 5% with 14 mg/2 ml betamethasone was injected
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
* evidence of local infection at the puncture site
* allergy to drugs used
* patients with bleeding tendency or coagulopathy, renal or hepatic failure, cardiac patients,
* bony abnormality and local malignant recurrence or lower vertebral metastasis.
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mansoura University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nevert Adel
lecturer of anesthesia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Yahay wahba
Al Mansurah, , Egypt
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
MansouraU2
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.