Comparative Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care

NCT ID: NCT03694431

Last Updated: 2020-02-20

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

3999 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-01-07

Study Completion Date

2020-01-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: To effectively alleviate suffering and improve quality of life for patients with serious illness and their caregivers, palliative care (PC) services must be offered across multiple settings. Research is needed to determine how best to optimize home-based palliative care (HBPC) services to meet the needs of individuals with high symptom burden and functional limitations.

Aim: The investigators will compare a standard HBPC model that includes routine home visits by a nurse and provider with a more efficient tech-supported HBPC model that promotes timely inter-professional team coordination via synchronous video consultation with the provider while the nurse is in the patient's home. The investigators hypothesize that tech-supported HBPC will be as effective as standard HBPC.

Design: Cluster randomized trial. Registered nurses (n\~130) will be randomly assigned to the tech-supported or standard HBPC model so that half of the patient-caregiver dyads will receive one of the two models.

Setting/Participants: Kaiser Permanente (15 Southern California and Oregon sites). Patients (n=10,000) with any serious illness and a prognosis of 1-2 years and their caregivers (n=4,800)

Methods: Patients and caregivers will receive standard PC services: comprehensive needs assessment and care planning, pain and symptom management, education/skills training, medication management, emotional/spiritual support; care coordination, referral to other services, and 24/7 phone assistance.

Results: Primary patient outcomes: symptom improvement at 1 month and days spent at home in the last six months of life; caregiver outcome: perception of preparedness for caregiving.

Conclusion: Should the more efficient tech-supported HBPC model achieves comparable improvements in outcomes that matter most to patients and caregivers, this would have a lasting impact on PC practice and policy.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cancer Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Heart Failure Dementia End Stage Liver Disease End Stage Renal Disease Neuromuscular Diseases

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Randomization of registered nurses stratified by site (n=15) to either standard or tech-supported HBPC
Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Standard HBPC

Patients and caregivers in standard HBPC will continue to receive usual care from the palliative care team which includes home visits

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Standard HBPC

Intervention Type OTHER

Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care

Tech-supported HBPC

Patients and caregivers in tech-supported HBPC will receive synchronous video visits with a provider (physician or nurse practitioner) while the nurse is in the patient's home. Home visits by the palliative care team will be determined based on patients/caregivers' needs.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tech-supported HBPC

Intervention Type OTHER

Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tech-supported HBPC

Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Standard HBPC

Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Serious illness with 12-24 month life expectancy
* Homebound
* Need for skilled nursing care (only at KP Southern California)
* English or Spanish speakers


* Non-professional family, friend or other caregiver
* English or Spanish speakers

Exclusion Criteria

\- Currently receiving HBPC
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Kaiser Permanente

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Huong Q Nguyen, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaiser Permanente

Richard A Mularski, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Kaiser Permanente

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Kaiser Permanente Southern California

Pasadena, California, United States

Site Status

Kaiser Permanente Northwest

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Nguyen HQ, Haupt EC, Duan L, Hou AC, Wang SE, Mariano JD, Lee JA, McMullen C. Hospital utilisation in home palliative care: caregiver health, preparedness and burden associations. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 25:bmjspcare-2021-003455. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003455. Online ahead of print.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35078873 (View on PubMed)

Mularski RA, Mittman B, Haupt E, Wang S, Scholle S, McMullen C, Henry M, Shen E, Nguyen HQ; HomePal Research Group. Performance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Large Pragmatic Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal): Methodological and Practical Considerations for Embedded Patient-Centered Design. J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):620-627. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0164. Epub 2021 Nov 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34735285 (View on PubMed)

Nguyen HQ, Mularski RA, Edwards PE, Lynn J, Machado MT, McBurnie MA, McMullen C, Mittman BS, Reinke LR, Shen E, Wang SE, Werch HS; HomePal Research Group. Protocol for a Noninferiority Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal). J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):20-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0116.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 31486724 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PLC-1609-36108

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.