Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
3999 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2019-01-07
2020-01-24
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Aim: The investigators will compare a standard HBPC model that includes routine home visits by a nurse and provider with a more efficient tech-supported HBPC model that promotes timely inter-professional team coordination via synchronous video consultation with the provider while the nurse is in the patient's home. The investigators hypothesize that tech-supported HBPC will be as effective as standard HBPC.
Design: Cluster randomized trial. Registered nurses (n\~130) will be randomly assigned to the tech-supported or standard HBPC model so that half of the patient-caregiver dyads will receive one of the two models.
Setting/Participants: Kaiser Permanente (15 Southern California and Oregon sites). Patients (n=10,000) with any serious illness and a prognosis of 1-2 years and their caregivers (n=4,800)
Methods: Patients and caregivers will receive standard PC services: comprehensive needs assessment and care planning, pain and symptom management, education/skills training, medication management, emotional/spiritual support; care coordination, referral to other services, and 24/7 phone assistance.
Results: Primary patient outcomes: symptom improvement at 1 month and days spent at home in the last six months of life; caregiver outcome: perception of preparedness for caregiving.
Conclusion: Should the more efficient tech-supported HBPC model achieves comparable improvements in outcomes that matter most to patients and caregivers, this would have a lasting impact on PC practice and policy.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Expanding Access to Home-Based Palliative Care
NCT03128060
Virtual Versus In-Person Approaches
NCT07274904
Early Intervention vs. Standard Palliative Care in Improving End-of-Life Care in Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT00253383
Technology-Enhanced Palliative Care for Advanced Cancer Patients
NCT04989556
Improving Palliative Care Access Through Technology
NCT04969484
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Standard HBPC
Patients and caregivers in standard HBPC will continue to receive usual care from the palliative care team which includes home visits
Standard HBPC
Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Tech-supported HBPC
Patients and caregivers in tech-supported HBPC will receive synchronous video visits with a provider (physician or nurse practitioner) while the nurse is in the patient's home. Home visits by the palliative care team will be determined based on patients/caregivers' needs.
Tech-supported HBPC
Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Tech-supported HBPC
Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Standard HBPC
Palliative care provided consistent with recommendations from the National Consensus Project for Quality Palliative Care
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Homebound
* Need for skilled nursing care (only at KP Southern California)
* English or Spanish speakers
* Non-professional family, friend or other caregiver
* English or Spanish speakers
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
OTHER
Kaiser Permanente
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Huong Q Nguyen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kaiser Permanente
Richard A Mularski, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Kaiser Permanente
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Kaiser Permanente Southern California
Pasadena, California, United States
Kaiser Permanente Northwest
Portland, Oregon, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nguyen HQ, Haupt EC, Duan L, Hou AC, Wang SE, Mariano JD, Lee JA, McMullen C. Hospital utilisation in home palliative care: caregiver health, preparedness and burden associations. BMJ Support Palliat Care. 2022 Jan 25:bmjspcare-2021-003455. doi: 10.1136/bmjspcare-2021-003455. Online ahead of print.
Mularski RA, Mittman B, Haupt E, Wang S, Scholle S, McMullen C, Henry M, Shen E, Nguyen HQ; HomePal Research Group. Performance of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in a Large Pragmatic Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal): Methodological and Practical Considerations for Embedded Patient-Centered Design. J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):620-627. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0164. Epub 2021 Nov 3.
Nguyen HQ, Mularski RA, Edwards PE, Lynn J, Machado MT, McBurnie MA, McMullen C, Mittman BS, Reinke LR, Shen E, Wang SE, Werch HS; HomePal Research Group. Protocol for a Noninferiority Comparative Effectiveness Trial of Home-Based Palliative Care (HomePal). J Palliat Med. 2019 Sep;22(S1):20-33. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2019.0116.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
PLC-1609-36108
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.