Crystalloids Versus Colloids Versus Hypertonic Saline as a Co-load During Spinal Anesthesia.

NCT ID: NCT03681847

Last Updated: 2018-09-24

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2018-02-28

Study Completion Date

2018-08-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Spinal anesthesia is commonly accompanied by hypotension due to vasodilation that follows sympathetic blockade and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Prevention of hypotension is usually achieved through administration of fluids and vasopressors .There is an ongoing debate concerning both the proper fluid timing, pre-load against co-load and fluid type crystalloids against colloids .This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of co-loading of crystalloids versus colloids versus hypertonic saline 3% in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Spinal anesthesia is commonly accompanied by hypotension due to vasodilation that follows sympathetic blockade and decreased systemic vascular resistance. Prevention of hypotension is usually achieved through administration of fluids and vasopressors . Fluids are either administrated before initiation of spinal anesthesia which is defined as fluid pre-loading or at time of initiation of spinal anesthesia which is defined as fluid co-loading .There is an ongoing debate concerning both the proper fluid timing, pre-load against co-load and fluid type crystalloids against colloids. Fluid preloading with colloids appears to have superior effect on that of crystalloids as the later shows a shorter intravascular half-life. While both colloid and crystalloid co-loading show comparable results .Although crystalloid preloading has been the traditional regimen for long time, it failed to reduce the incidence of hypotension. This is because crystalloids rapidly distribute out of the intravascular compartment to the interstitial space. Superiority of fluid co-loading might be explained by decrease of the extravascular crystalloid redistribution secondary to the simultaneous vasodilatation response to sympathetic block.This study aims at comparing the effectiveness of co-loading of crystalloids versus colloids versus hypertonic saline 3% in preventing hypotension induced by spinal anesthesia.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Anaesthesia

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

normal saline

Patients will receive normal saline 0.9% 15 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Normal saline

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

normal saline 0.9% 15 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.

Hydroxyethyl starch

Patients will receive hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9 % sodium chloride 5 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

hydroxyethyl starch

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9 % sodium chloride 5 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.

Hypertonic saline

Patients will receive hypertonic saline 3% (7ml/kg) over 15-20 minutes.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Hypertonic saline

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hypertonic saline 3% (7ml/kg) over 15-20 minutes.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Normal saline

normal saline 0.9% 15 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

hydroxyethyl starch

hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 in 0.9 % sodium chloride 5 ml/kg over 15-20 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Hypertonic saline

hypertonic saline 3% (7ml/kg) over 15-20 minutes.

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age 18-65 years
* ASA II-III
* Elective lower abdominal surgeries

Exclusion Criteria

* Coagulation defects
* Abnormal kidney or liver functions
* Local infection at site of injection
* Uncontrolled hypertension
* Bone metastases
* Cardiac disease
* Elevated serum sodium level \> 145 mEq/L
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

National Cancer Institute, Egypt

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Ehab Hanafy Shaker

lecturer of anesthesia ,critical care and pain medicine

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Ehab H Shaker, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Institute- Cairo University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Anesthesia and Pain medicine.National Cancer Institute

Cairo, , Egypt

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Egypt

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2528143

Colloid versus Crystallid Co-load with Spinal Anesthesia during Emergent Cesarean Section and Their Effect on Hemodynamic Changes.Lotfy ME; Moustafa AM; Elham M.E, et al. J Am Sci 2014;10(11):158-163\]

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Ehab-Walaa.Hypertonic

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.