Clinical Trial for Patients With a Stage IV Childhood Renal Tumor, Comparing Upfront Vincristine, Actinomycin-D and Doxorubicin (Standard Arm) With Upfront Vincristine, Carboplatin and Etoposide (Experimental Arm)

NCT ID: NCT03669783

Last Updated: 2025-04-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

RECRUITING

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

110 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2023-02-03

Study Completion Date

2033-10-03

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Nephroblastoma (Wilms tumor, WT) is the most common renal tumor of childhood representing ± 6% of all childhood malignancies. The diagnosis is established on clinical and radiological grounds. Metastases are visible on conventional imaging in at least 12% of nephroblastoma patients; however, an additional \~15% of patients have nodules on CT-scan only. The treatment consists of neoadjuvant (preoperative) chemotherapy, nephrectomy and risk-based adjuvant chemotherapy ± radiation therapy (RT) to the flank and/or metastases. For truly localized tumors, overall survival is \> 85% (high risk histology excluded). Several high risk biological characteristics have been identified: diffuse anaplasia, gain of 1q chromosome, loss of heterozygosity 1p + 16q, blastemal residual volume.

For metastatic nephroblastoma, the standard neo-adjuvant chemotherapy includes 3 drugs: vincristine, actinomycin-D and doxorubicin (VAD). Long-term survival is 82% (1). However, two issues arise. First, the use of doxorubicin ± concomitant RT might be associated with cardiac and pulmonary sequelae (4-17% of congestive heart failure) (2), and actinomycin-D is associated with hepatic toxicity (3). Second, patients with "CT-only" nodules are treated according to "localized disease". However, their outcome is poorer than that of truly "localized disease" (4-6).

The efficacy of carboplatin and etoposide is known for a long time; these drugs are used as second line treatment or for high-risk histology nephroblastoma. Therefore, an alternate chemotherapy has been designed that combines drugs shown as highly efficacious in nephroblastoma, i.e., Vincristine, Carboplatin and Etoposide (VCE). VCE has been used for the treatment of other pediatric malignancies. For metastatic nephroblastoma, the switch from VAD to VCE and the associated reduction of actinomycin-D and doxorubicin is expected to reduce the chemotherapy-related long-term toxicity. In addition, VCE could potentially decrease the rate of patients requiring pulmonary RT. Finally VCE may have a beneficial effect on tumor high risk biological characteristics.

French patients with nephroblastoma have been treated for \> 40 years according to SIOP protocols collaborating in the SIOP Renal Tumour Study Group (SIOP-RTSG). This group has designed an international randomized phase III clinical trial for the evaluation of VCE versus VAD in patients with metastatic renal tumors (\>\>90% having nephroblastoma), in order to decrease the long-term toxicity while at least preserving, if not improving, the treatment efficacy. In addition, the issue of "CT-only" nodules and their adequate treatment needs to be solved. In previous protocols, the treatment strategy was based on the diagnosis of pulmonary metastases (\~90% of all metastases) by conventional pulmonary X-ray. Central Radiological Review (CRR) is planned for the initial staging using CT ± MRI, as it is expected to more accurately detect patients with metastatic disease, including patients with "CT-only" nodules. In addition, CRR will be set up for real-time response assessment during treatment, in order to reliably determine who require pulmonary RT and which postoperative chemotherapy.

Therefore, the main trial objectives are:

* Explore the non-inferiority (efficacy) of neoadjuvant VCE chemotherapy (experimental arm) as compared to the standard arm with VAD.
* Provide central radiological review (CRR) at diagnosis and after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in order to determine more precisely the appropriate treatment for each patient.

The primary objective of the RCT is to investigate the metastatic complete response rate (MetCR, including very good partial response (VGPR)) of neoadjuvant 6 weeks of VAD as compared to neoadjuvant VCE in stage IV renal tumours using CRR. Several international studies have shown that MetCR is a good surrogate endpoint for survival.

The postoperative treatment, secondary objectives as well as the intended methodology are detailed in the research project.

The total number of patients is 406 patients for the entire phase III trial running in the 12 major SIOP countries (max 110 patients in France).

The expected trial duration is 5 years for accrual + 2 years follow-up (the overall 10-year follow-up for long-term toxicity will be an independently funded ancillary study. This duration is required for a reliable evaluation of the cardiac toxicity).

The results of the current trial should be useful for the future protocols for the treatment of all patients with nephroblastoma (metastatic but also localized and bilateral).

The results of this RCT will be worthy for the entire international pediatric oncology community and future patients throughout the world and will be communicated in scientific congresses and high-level peer-reviewed journals.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Childhood Renal Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

treatment VAD

Vincristin, Actinomycin-D and Doxorubicin

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

treatment Vincristin

Intervention Type DRUG

1 x Vincristin 1,5mg/m² iv bolus day 1 in week 1,2,3,4,5,6

treatment Actinomycin-D

Intervention Type DRUG

1 x Actinomycin D 45µg/kg iv bolus day 1 in week 1, 3, 5

treatment Doxorubicin

Intervention Type DRUG

1 x Doxorubicin 50mg/m² 6h Infusion day 1 in week 1,5

treatment VCE

Vincristin, Carboplatin and Etoposide

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

treatment Vincristin

Intervention Type DRUG

1 x Vincristin 1,5mg/m² iv bolus day 1 in week 1,2,3,4,5,6

treatment Carboplatin

Intervention Type DRUG

1 x Carboplatin 200 mg/m² 1h infusion day 1,2,3 in week 1,4

Etoposide

Intervention Type DRUG

1 x Etoposide 100mg/m² 1h infusion day 1,2,3 in week 1,4

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

treatment Vincristin

1 x Vincristin 1,5mg/m² iv bolus day 1 in week 1,2,3,4,5,6

Intervention Type DRUG

treatment Actinomycin-D

1 x Actinomycin D 45µg/kg iv bolus day 1 in week 1, 3, 5

Intervention Type DRUG

treatment Doxorubicin

1 x Doxorubicin 50mg/m² 6h Infusion day 1 in week 1,5

Intervention Type DRUG

treatment Carboplatin

1 x Carboplatin 200 mg/m² 1h infusion day 1,2,3 in week 1,4

Intervention Type DRUG

Etoposide

1 x Etoposide 100mg/m² 1h infusion day 1,2,3 in week 1,4

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* suffering from metastatic renal tumour at initial diagnosis
* having at least one circumscript, non-calcified (pulmonary) nodule (or other lesion highly suspicious of metastasis according to criteria for metastatic disease) ≥ 3 mm as determined by chest CT-scan and abdominal CT-scan/MRI.
* Metastatic disease must be confirmed by central review.

Exclusion Criteria

\-
Maximum Eligible Age

17 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

German Society for Pediatric Oncology and Hematology GPOH gGmbH

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Emilie GARRIDO-PRADALIE

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Assistance Publique Hopitaux De Marseille

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Assistance Publique Hopitaux de Marseille

Marseille, , France

Site Status RECRUITING

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

France

Central Contacts

Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.

Arnauld VERSCHUUR

Role: CONTACT

+33.491.38.84.78

Facility Contacts

Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.

ARNAULD VERSCHUUR

Role: primary

+33.491.38.84.78

Claire MORANDO

Role: backup

+33.491.38.21.83

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-07

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.