Randomized Study for the Optimal Treatment of Symptomatic Patients With Low Gradient Severe Aortic Valve Stenosis and Preserved Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction

NCT ID: NCT03667365

Last Updated: 2023-03-01

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

52 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2019-03-19

Study Completion Date

2021-11-16

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

According to current European Recommendations on valvular heart disease (VHD), "classical" severe aortic stenosis (AS) is defined by an aortic valve area (AVA) ≤1 cm2 and indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2, a mean aortic pressure gradient (MAG) \>40 mmHg, and a maximal aortic velocity \>4 m/sec.

Aortic valve replacement (AVR) is recommended (class I indication) in patients with "classical" severe AS who have any symptoms related to aortic valve disease.

In 2007, Hachicha et al. described a particular pattern of severe AS, characterized by an AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2, low mean pressure aortic gradient (MAG \<40 mmHg), despite the presence of a preserved left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF ≥50%). This pattern of AS is encountered in nearly 15-25 % of patients who have severe AS. Typically, these patients are elderly subjects, with several comorbidities, a small left ventricular (LV) cavity with pronounced LV concentric remodeling and a restrictive physiology, leading to a decrease in LV stroke volume despite a preserved LVEF. The diagnosis and management of patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF are often challenging because:

1. the presence of a "true" severe aortic stenosis should be carefully confirmed by a multi-modality imaging approach;
2. the best therapeutic management (AVR versus conservative strategy) of symptomatic patients with low gradient severe AS and preserved LVEF is not clearly established.

In very recently updated European guidelines on the management of VHD, symptomatic patients with low gradient and low flow severe AS and preserved LVEF have only a class IIa-level C indication for AVR. No specific indications are given for the management of symptomatic patients with low gradient and normal flow severe AS. This lack of indications is clearly attributed to a gap in knowledge which requires further investigations to be filled up.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Aortic Valve Stenosis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

aortic valve replacement

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

aortic valve replacement

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

aortic valve replacement surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (will be decided by the heart team before randomization)

strict clinical surveillance

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

strict clinical surveillance

Intervention Type OTHER

strict clinical surveillance strategy

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

aortic valve replacement

aortic valve replacement surgical or transcatheter aortic valve replacement (will be decided by the heart team before randomization)

Intervention Type PROCEDURE

strict clinical surveillance

strict clinical surveillance strategy

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \>18 years
2. Symptomatic and severe AS defined by an effective AVA ≤1 cm² and indexed AVA ≤0.6 cm2/m2
3. LVEF ≥50%
4. MAG \<40 mm Hg (measure confirmed by the multi-window continuous-wave Doppler interrogation and use of Pedoff probe)
5. Confirmation of the presence of severe AS at DSE and MDCT aortic calcium score
6. Feasibility of AVR by surgery or TAVR according to the "heart team"
7. Signature of an informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

1. Uncontrolled atrial of ventricular arrhythmias
2. Patient having a life expectancy \<1 year, independently from their aortic pathology
3. Coronary artery disease necessitating a percutaneous or surgical revascularisation
4. Presence of a concomitant valve disease needing surgical treatment
5. Patient who are included in another research protocol
6. Protected person (adults legally protected (under judicial protection, guardianship or supervision), person deprived of their liberty, pregnant woman, lactating woman and minor)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Rennes University Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Elena EG Galli, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Rennes

Erwan ED Donal, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

CHU Rennes

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

CHU Liège

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

CHU Amiens - Picardie

Amiens, , France

Site Status

CHU Angers

Angers, , France

Site Status

CHU Brest - Hôpital La Cavale Blanche

Brest, , France

Site Status

APHP - CHU Henri Mondor

Créteil, , France

Site Status

CHU Dijon - Hôpital François Mitterrand

Dijon, , France

Site Status

CHU Lille

Lille, , France

Site Status

CH Bretagne Sud

Lorient, , France

Site Status

APHM - Hôpital La Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Clinique du Millénaire

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

CHU Nantes

Nantes, , France

Site Status

CHU Rennes

Rennes, , France

Site Status

CH Saint-Brieuc

Saint-Brieuc, , France

Site Status

Centre Cardiologique du Nord

Saint-Denis, , France

Site Status

CHU Toulouse - Hôpital Rangueil

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

CHU Tours - Hôpital Trousseau

Tours, , France

Site Status

CHU Nancy

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

CH Bretagne Atlantique - Site de Vannes

Vannes, , France

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium France

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2018-A02100-55

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

35RC17_8843_ROTAS

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.