Efficacy of Rilpivirine-based Regimens as Switch Therapy From Nevirapine-based Regimens in HIV-infected Patients
NCT ID: NCT03664440
Last Updated: 2018-09-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
106 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2016-12-01
2017-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Methods: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted in HIV-infected patients who received NVP-based regimens and had undetectable plasma HIV RNA for more than 6 months. Patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation arm (NVP-based regimens were continued) or switch arm (NVP-based regimens were switched to RPV-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens. Primary endpoint was HIV RNA \<40 copies/mL at 48 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Changes of CD4 cell counts and lipid profiles from baseline were analyzed.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Rilpivirine in Virologically Suppressed Adolescents
NCT03033368
A Randomised Trial to Evaluate the Antiviral Efficacy and Safety of Treatment With 500 mg Tipranavir (TPV) Plus 100 mg or 200 mg Ritonavir (RTV) p.o. BID in Comparison to 400 mg Lopinavir (LPV) Plus 100 mg RTV p.o. BID in Combination With Standard Background Regimen in ARV Therapy naïve Patients.
NCT00144105
Switch From Nevirapine-based Regimen to Once a Day Rilpivirine/Emtricitabine/Tenofovir
NCT02104700
Safety, Tolerability, Drug Interactions, and Antiviral Activity of Rilpivirine in Antiretroviral-Naive HIV-Infected Children Less Than 12 Years of Age
NCT01975012
Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy in Children
NCT00626301
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
continuation arm
patients who currently received TDF/3TC/NVP (group A) or TDF/FTC/NVP (group B) were block 4 randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random numbers, to continue their current regimen of NVP 200 mg twice daily plus TDF/3TC (group A1) and plus TDF/FTC (groupB1)
Nevirapine
Patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation arm (NVP-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.
switch arm
patients who currently received TDF/3TC/NVP (group A) or TDF/FTC/NVP (group B) were block 4 randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random numbers to switch from NVP to RPV 25 mg once-daily plus TDF/3TC (group A2) and plus TDF/FTC (groupB2)
Rilpivirine
Patients were randomized 1:1 to switch arm (NVP-based regimens were switched to RPV-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Nevirapine
Patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation arm (NVP-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.
Rilpivirine
Patients were randomized 1:1 to switch arm (NVP-based regimens were switched to RPV-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient who treated with TDF/FTC/NVP or TDF/3TC/NVP for at least 6 month
Exclusion Criteria
19 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mahidol University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University
Bangkok, , Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hagins D, Orkin C, Daar ES, Mills A, Brinson C, DeJesus E, Post FA, Morales-Ramirez J, Thompson M, Osiyemi O, Rashbaum B, Stellbrink HJ, Martorell C, Liu H, Liu YP, Porter D, Collins SE, SenGupta D, Das M. Switching to coformulated rilpivirine (RPV), emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide from either RPV, FTC and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz, FTC and TDF: 96-week results from two randomized clinical trials. HIV Med. 2018 Nov;19(10):724-733. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12664. Epub 2018 Aug 12.
Taramasso L, Tatarelli P, Ricci E, Madeddu G, Menzaghi B, Squillace N, De Socio GV, Martinelli C, Gulminetti R, Maggi P, Orofino G, Vichi F, Di Biagio A, Bonfanti P; CISAI Study Group. Improvement of lipid profile after switching from efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to rilpivirine or once-daily integrase inhibitors: results from a large observational cohort study (SCOLTA). BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3268-5.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
10-59-04
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.