Efficacy of Rilpivirine-based Regimens as Switch Therapy From Nevirapine-based Regimens in HIV-infected Patients

NCT ID: NCT03664440

Last Updated: 2018-09-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

106 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2016-12-01

Study Completion Date

2017-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Background: Nevirapine (NVP)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART) remains to be used in HIV-infected patients in resource limited countries despite its compliance and adverse effect concerns. Rilpivirine (RPV), a newer non-nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor, could be used as an alternative to NVP in virologically suppressed patients. However, there has been limited experience with switching from NVP-based to RPV-based regimens. The investigators aimed to study efficacy and adverse events after ART switching from NVP-based to RPV-based regimens.

Methods: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial was conducted in HIV-infected patients who received NVP-based regimens and had undetectable plasma HIV RNA for more than 6 months. Patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation arm (NVP-based regimens were continued) or switch arm (NVP-based regimens were switched to RPV-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens. Primary endpoint was HIV RNA \<40 copies/mL at 48 weeks, with a non-inferiority margin of 12%. Changes of CD4 cell counts and lipid profiles from baseline were analyzed.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

A single-center randomized controlled, non-inferiority trial to study 48-week treatment outcomes of RPV as a switch therapy was conducted at Ramathibodi Hospital, a tertiary care health center in Thailand from December 2016 to October 2017 Eligible patients who currently received TDF/3TC/NVP (group A) or TDF/FTC/NVP (group B) were block 4 randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random numbers, to continue their current regimen of NVP 200 mg twice daily plus TDF/3TC (group A1) and plus TDF/FTC (groupB1), or to switch from NVP to RPV 25 mg once-daily plus TDF/3TC (group A2) and plus TDF/FTC (groupB2). Patients were advised to take RPV with a meal. Patients were scheduled trial visits at baseline, week 12, 24, 36 and week 48. The laboratory assessment was performed at baseline week 24 and week 48.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Efficacy of Rilpivirine-based Regimens as Switch Therapy

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

continuation arm

patients who currently received TDF/3TC/NVP (group A) or TDF/FTC/NVP (group B) were block 4 randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random numbers, to continue their current regimen of NVP 200 mg twice daily plus TDF/3TC (group A1) and plus TDF/FTC (groupB1)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Nevirapine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation arm (NVP-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.

switch arm

patients who currently received TDF/3TC/NVP (group A) or TDF/FTC/NVP (group B) were block 4 randomly assigned (1:1) by computer-generated random numbers to switch from NVP to RPV 25 mg once-daily plus TDF/3TC (group A2) and plus TDF/FTC (groupB2)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Rilpivirine

Intervention Type DRUG

Patients were randomized 1:1 to switch arm (NVP-based regimens were switched to RPV-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Nevirapine

Patients were randomized 1:1 to continuation arm (NVP-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.

Intervention Type DRUG

Rilpivirine

Patients were randomized 1:1 to switch arm (NVP-based regimens were switched to RPV-based regimens). Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) plus lamivudine (3TC) or emtricitabine (FTC) remained as the backbone of the regimens.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Recent plasma HIV-1 RNA viral load within 6 months of the screening that was less than 40 copies/mL, and a CD4 cell count that was more than 200 cells/mm3
* Patient who treated with TDF/FTC/NVP or TDF/3TC/NVP for at least 6 month

Exclusion Criteria

* patients with a history of HIV drug resistance, patients who used other drugs or drugs which interact with RPV (proton pump inhibitors, histamine H2-receptor antagonists, rifampin, antiepileptic drugs), female patients during pregnancy or breastfeeding, patients whose estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR)was \<60 mL/min/1.73m2 \[by The Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) (12)\], and patients diagnosed with depressive or psychiatric disorders.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Mahidol University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Department of Medicine, Faculty of Medicine Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University

Bangkok, , Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Hagins D, Orkin C, Daar ES, Mills A, Brinson C, DeJesus E, Post FA, Morales-Ramirez J, Thompson M, Osiyemi O, Rashbaum B, Stellbrink HJ, Martorell C, Liu H, Liu YP, Porter D, Collins SE, SenGupta D, Das M. Switching to coformulated rilpivirine (RPV), emtricitabine (FTC) and tenofovir alafenamide from either RPV, FTC and tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) or efavirenz, FTC and TDF: 96-week results from two randomized clinical trials. HIV Med. 2018 Nov;19(10):724-733. doi: 10.1111/hiv.12664. Epub 2018 Aug 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30101539 (View on PubMed)

Taramasso L, Tatarelli P, Ricci E, Madeddu G, Menzaghi B, Squillace N, De Socio GV, Martinelli C, Gulminetti R, Maggi P, Orofino G, Vichi F, Di Biagio A, Bonfanti P; CISAI Study Group. Improvement of lipid profile after switching from efavirenz or ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitors to rilpivirine or once-daily integrase inhibitors: results from a large observational cohort study (SCOLTA). BMC Infect Dis. 2018 Jul 31;18(1):357. doi: 10.1186/s12879-018-3268-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 30064371 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

10-59-04

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Pharmacokinetics of Low Dose Ritonavir
NCT00622206 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Lopinavir (LPV) Dose Reduction
NCT01159275 COMPLETED PHASE1/PHASE2
Atazanavir/r + Lamivudine Dual Therapy
NCT01599364 COMPLETED PHASE4